Legal Technology News

Patent-Infringement Ruling Reinstated against Samsung
Download PDF

apple samsung patent fight

Summary: Apple’s patent-infringement ruling of $119.6 million against Samsung was reinstated by an appeals court.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stated the three-judge panel was wrong for tossing the $119.6 million verdict Apple Inc. won against Samsung Electronics Co. for patent-infringement. Apple claims Samsung used its slide-to-unlock feature for smartphones and tablets. The 8-3 ruling ordered the trial judge to reconsider the judgement and possibly increasing it based on if there was intentional infringement by Samsung.

  
What
Where


Read Apple Samsung Battle Takes New Turn.

In less than a week, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear another case Apple has against Samsung regarding if the company should pay for copying patented Apple iPhone designs. Both cases are examples of the ongoing legal battle between the largest smartphones makers in the world that started five years ago and was even been fought one four continents at one time.

Apple’s claim that Samsung infringed on their patents for the features slide-to-unlock, autocorrect, and phone number detection that can be tapped to make phone ended with a large award. A large part of the award, $98.7 million, solely covered the detection patent. The previous panel ruled the patent wasn’t infringed and that the other two patents were invalid.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




See Another Key Apple Patent in the Apple Samsung War Ruled Invalid by Patent Office.

The appeals court said the panel’s decision was wrong because it relied on matters that were never raised on appeal or information that was not part of the trial record. Circuit Judge Kimberley Moore said, “The jury verdict on each issue is supported by substantial evidence in the record.”



The three judges to oppose the ruling were the three that tossed the verdict in the first place.

Do you think Apple should have sole ownership of the features? Tell us in the comments below.

To learn more about the lawsuit, read Apple and Samsung Call Ceasefire to Patent War outside US.

Photo: nation.com.pk



 

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Junior Commercial Litigation Attorney with products liability experience

USA-AZ-Phoenix

Phoenix office of our client seeks junior commercial litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experienc...

Apply Now

Employment Defense Attorney with 5+ years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks employment defense attorney with 5+ years of litigation exper...

Apply Now

IP Patent Attorney with 2-5 years of computer engineering experience

USA-WI-Milwaukee

Milwaukee office of our client seeks intellectual property patent attorney with 2-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Litigation Attorney AV-rated, Loop defense firm of trial lawyers seeks associate attorney to join...

Apply now

Domestic Relations and Family Law Paralegal

USA-OH-Dayton

Kirkland & Sommers Co., LPA is currently seeking a paralegal that could assist and grow with our fir...

Apply now

Legal Secretary

USA-NJ-Hackensack

Hackensack law firm seeks a Legal Secretary (with a minimum of 3 years LEGAL experience) Candidate w...

Apply now

Legal Development Associate

USA-WI-Menomonee Falls

Seeking a talented and dedicated Real Estate Paralegal!   Continental Properties Company,...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top