Breaking News

Another Key Apple Patent in the Apple Samsung War Ruled Invalid by Patent Office
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Apple’s position in the Smartphone wars against Samsung seems to be growing more tenuous every day. On Wednesday, Samsung submitted a filing in the Federal District Court in San Jose showing that the U.S. Patent Office has found another key Apple patent invalid in a preliminary reexamination.

While the new one, No. 7,844,915, that covers software distinguishing between single-touch and multitouch gestures has been found invalid now by the USPTO,it is subject to appeal by Apple and the invalidation is yet not final.

The other patent out of the six in the Apple Samsung war that has already been found invalid by the USPTO is one concerning the “bounce” feature – one that makes the on-screen page bounce when a user pulls his/her finger from the top to the bottom of the touchscreen.

  
What
Where


However, both the patents are included among the six patents upon whose alleged infringement a jury in August held Samsung liable to pay Apple $1.05 billion in damages. A verdict that now stands challenged and Samsung has made a petition for a new trial.

In both cases, as in the case of the vaunted “Steve Jobs” patent, the USPTO has ruled that the patents should not have been granted in the first place – making them subject to being void ab initio.

The whole affair brings to mind the old adage – people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones at others. These patents, which never should have been allowed in the first place, as they intend to monopolize a right to solutions rather than providing specific solutions, and also restrict how human users can apply their gestures to specific solutions – read flick/scroll et cetera, had been denied reexamination multiple times by the USPTO. However, when Apple brought Samsung into the game, things began to change.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




If the patents are held void ab initio, then it can be a major headache for Apple as many other companies which had, and have been paying millions of dollars in royalty on the same patents to Apple can have claims to have their money back. Other causes of action may also follow.

The patent invalidated currently in a preliminary finding upon reexamination by the USPTO is commonly known as the “pinch to zoom” patent, but it has a very wide scope and Apple’s legal documents refer to it as applying to a “scroll versus gesture” feature.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-WY-Laramie

Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate

USA-CA-San Francisco

Requirements Candidates should have two to five years of litigation and arbitration experience.&#...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-NC-Jefferson

Growing law firm in need of a real estate paralegal. Ideal candidate will be organized, responsible,...

Apply now

Creditor's Rights / Collection Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Bannockburn, IL-based Regional Debt Collection Law Firm seeks consumer collection attorney with 1-4 ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney - Immigration

USA-NJ-Paramus

Entry-level associate with some experience in immigration law. Duties will include court appearances...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top