Breaking News

Apple Samsung Battle Takes New Turn
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on Monday that the US District Court for the Northern District of California had abused its discretion when denying Apple’s request for an injunction on the sale of Samsung devices that infringed utility patients. The Court of Appeals sent the matter back to the lower court with instructions to reconsider Apple’s petition.

While doing so, however, the Court of Appeals upheld the decision of the lower court to refuse an injunction based on design patents.

  
What
Where


The utility patents concern the “multi-touch display,” and “double tap to zoom” features along with “bounce-back” feature.

The Court of Appeals also placed Apple squarely in a position where there is little room to maneuver with conjectures. The court said, “Rather than show that a patent feature is the exclusive reason for consumer demand, Apple must show some connection between the patented feature and demand for Samsung products.”

In the Apple-Samsung saga, Judge Lucy Koh had found in December 2012 that Apple had failed to demonstrate irreparable harm if the 26 Samsung devices it wanted banned were not banned. Earlier, in Aug 2012 a jury verdict had granted Apple an award of $1.05 billion, which was later significantly reduced by Koh in March 2013, when a new trial was held.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The new trial took into consideration only 14 of the 26 products and Judge Koh found that the jury had awarded damages “based on a legally impermissible theory.”

On Monday, the three-judge panel said, “The district court abused its discretion by failing to properly analyze whether damages would adequately compensate Apple for Samsung’s infringement of these patents.”



However, Samsung seemed happy with the judgment in as much as the Court of Appeals ousted the scope of further challenges based on design patents. Samsung spokesman Adam Yates said in a statement, “The remand concerns a very narrow scope of evidence presented by Apple. Therefore, we are confident that an injunction will be avoided.”



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Personal Injury Attorney with 3+ Years of Experience

USA-CA-Sherman Oaks

Sherman Oaks office of our client is seeking a personal injury attorney with 3+ years of CA experien...

Apply Now

Senior Trust and Estate Attorney/ Of Counsel

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office is seeking a trust and estate attorney at either the senior associate or of counsel...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of an AmLaw firm seeks Mid-level Litigation Securities Associate Attorney with ...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Attorneys

USA-CA-Pleasant Hill

Civil litigation defense firm with offices in Contra Costa and Solano Counties, seeking litigation a...

Apply now

Senior Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Gaglione, Dolan & Kaplan is looking to hire an associate attorney with 5 + years experience in insur...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-DE-Wilmington

Manning Gross + Massenburg LLP (MG+M) is currently recruiting a junior to mid-level Associate for ou...

Apply now

Director of Resolution

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Tax firm seeks heavily seasoned attorney for director of resolution role. Min. 5 yrs of tax experien...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top