Loading...
In a significant legal development, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has nullified a substantial verdict against FedEx, totaling $366.2 million. The lawsuit, brought forward by Jennifer Harris, a Black sales manager, alleged that FedEx terminated her in retaliation for accusing her supervisor of racial discrimination. However, the court’s decision departs from the initial jury ruling in October 2022.
Reduction in Damages and Legal Response
The appeals court dismissed the punitive damages awarded to Harris and significantly reduced the compensation for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience. Initially set at $1.16 million, these damages have been scaled down to $248,620. Despite affirming evidence supporting Harris’ retaliation claims, the court deemed her undeserving of the substantial damages initially granted.
Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.
FedEx responded to the court’s decision, expressing confidence in the propriety of its actions regarding Harris’ termination. The company expressed satisfaction with the court’s ruling to diminish the awarded damages.
Background and Legal Proceedings
Jennifer Harris, who had served FedEx for over 12 years, asserted that her dismissal in January 2020 resulted from her objections against her supervisor’s discriminatory conduct. Allegedly, Harris received a negative performance review from her white supervisor, whom she accused of attempting to demote her. However, the court found Harris failed to meet the stringent criteria under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prove FedEx’s malicious or reckless intentions.
Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!
Circuit Judge Cory Wilson, articulating the court’s stance, emphasized that Harris couldn’t substantiate FedEx’s malicious intent. Instead, the evidence suggested disciplinary action against Harris for insubordination rather than retaliation for her grievances.
Significance and Legal Implications
This case is one of the most significant workplace bias or retaliation lawsuits involving a single employee in the United States. Despite the reduction in damages, the legal proceedings underscore the complexities surrounding discrimination and retaliation claims within corporate environments.
Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.
