Legal News

Arizona’s Abortion Law Held as Unconstitutional
Download PDF

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday chose not to hear Arizona’s state appeal against the 9th Circuit’s unanimous decision holding Arizona’s abortion law as unconstitutional. Without dissent or comment, the court refused to hear the case that involved a ban on abortion beyond twenty weeks after conception of pregnancy.

This is the second time this term the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an abortion law related matter. The first involved an Oklahoma law that limited the ability of doctors to perform medical abortions. After obtaining fuller explanation of the matter from the Oklahoma Supreme Court, the U.S. Supreme Court had removed the matter from its docket.

  
What
Where


In the Arizona case, the state had submitted that the flat abortion ban beyond twenty weeks of conception was to protect fetuses from feeling pain during the procedure and for protecting women from associated health risks. However, when the matter came before it, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled unanimously that the law was unconstitutional.

In November, however, in the matter of an abortion ban in Texas, which bars abortions in clinics that do not have a doctor on its staff with professional privileges in a nearby hospital, the Supreme Court was divided and chose not to block the law. Currently the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is reviewing the constitutionality of that law, while it is already in force.

The effect of the Supreme Court’s decision to not hear the challenge against the decision of the 9th Circuit means that the Arizona abortion ban, as also a similar ban in Idaho, which comes under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit, will not be implemented.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




In a statement, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards said, “Today the Court did the right thing, but women’s health is still on the docket – not only at the Supreme Court, but in active cases all across the country.”





 

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Attorney with 3-7 years of litigation experience

USA-IL-Chicago

Chicago office of our client seeks attorney with 3-7 years of litigation experience. The candidate s...

Apply Now

Defense Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks defense attorney with 3-4 years of solid litigation experie...

Apply Now

Mid-level IP Litigation Attorney with electrical engineering experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level intellectual property attorney with 3-5 years of ...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney - Personal Injury

USA-NY-Great Neck

A well-known prestigious plaintiff’s personal injury law firm is seeking an organized, smart, ...

Apply now

Southern Poverty Law Center’s Southeast Immigrant Freedom Initiative (SIFI)

USA-GA-Atlanta

Overview: The Southeast Immigrant Freedom Initiative (SIFI) provides high-quality, holistic pro b...

Apply now

Researcher / Policy Analyst - Children's Rights

USA-AL-Montgomery

Overview: This position could be located in one of several SPLC offices, depending on personal ci...

Apply now

Attorney NJ/NY

USA-NY-New York City

A premier plaintiff\'s personal injury law firm seeks a high-energy Associate experienced in litigat...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top