Legal News

9th Circuit Rules Police Can Be Sued for Death of Pets
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has reversed the decision of a lower court and ruled on Thursday that District Judge Larry Hicks was wrong when made the summarily dismissed a civil rights lawsuit brought by a Nevada woman whose dogs were shot and killed by police. The court ruled the Las Vegas woman can sue the North Las Vegas Police Department and the six officers involved in the killing of the woman’s pit bull and mastiff dogs.

Louisa Thurston, the owner of the dogs, broke down when recounting the events. “Why did they do it?” she sobbed, “None of them were bitten. They saw them wiggling their tails when they arrived. I begged them not to hurt my dogs.”

  
What
Where


Six SWAT officers had gone to Thurston’s home to execute a search warrant against Thurston’s husband on armed robbery charges. The dogs, Blue and Bruno were shot repeatedly and killed by the officers, though the dogs did not exhibit any hostile attitude beyond those ordinarily exhibited at the presence of strangers. Bruno was shot eight times, and the dead dogs were hauled away in plastic bags before the eyes of Thurston and her daughter.

Thurston said, “I want these cops held accountable … It is not about money; it was about what they did to my babies … My dogs did not growl. They did not bark …”

The 9th Circuit held, it is reasonable to infer “the officers had enough time to observe the dogs’ behavior and summon animal control officers.” The court observed there is a “genuine issue of fact as to whether the dogs attacked” the police at all.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The court also observed that according to the policy of North Las Vegas Police Department, it “dictates attendance, if not participation, of an animal control officer whenever police know there are dogs present inside a home.”

Further, the court said, “The absence of an animal control officer – in contravention of general policy and despite time to summon one after entry – further raises a genuine issue of fact as to the reasonableness of the officers’ actions.”





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a mid-level litigation attorney with experience taking/defending dep...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a support attorney with some experience/familiarity with a litigatio...

Apply Now

Patent Prosecution Attorney

USA-MI-Northville

Northville office of our client seeks patent prosecution attorney with 5 years of experience. The ca...

Apply Now

Trademark and Copyright Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks trademark and copyright associate attorney with 4-8 years o...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney - Insurance Defense

USA-GA-Atlanta

Downtown litigation law firm seeks associate with 3 to 5 years of experience in insurance defense, i...

Apply now

Legal Secretary-Cannabis Law Firm

USA-MI-Lansing

Vora, PLLC. Is accepting applications for a Legal Secretary or Paralegal. We are a cannabis law firm...

Apply now

Paralegal- Cannabis Law Firm

USA-MI-Lansing

Vora, PLLC. Is accepting applications for a Paralegal or Legal Secretary. We are a cannabis law...

Apply now

Legal Administrative Assistant

USA-CA-Sacramento

Under the general direction of the supervising attorney(s) and according to established Firm policie...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top