Legal News

9th Circuit Rules Gays and Lesbians to Not Be Prevented from Jury Service
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In a decision with widespread significance, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled this week that it was unconstitutional to exclude jurors based on sexual orientation as it is also unconstitutional to exclude women and minorities from juries.

Writing on behalf of the 9th Circuit, Judge Stephen Reinhardt observed that excluding prospective jurors based on their sexual orientation is a “deplorable tradition of treating gays and lesbians as undeserving of participation in our nation’s most cherished rites and rituals.”

  
What
Where


The unanimous three-judge panel observed that such biases “deprive individuals of the opportunity to participate in perfecting democracy and guarding our ideals of justice on account of a characteristic that has nothing to do with their fitness to serve.”

The issue came to fore in the high-profile legal battle between Abbot Laboratories and SmithKline Beecham in a 2011 federal antitrust trial in Oakland. SmithKline’s legal team alleged that Abbott had removed a gay juror because the trial involved a claim of Abbott inflating the price of a crucial HIV treatment drug.

As a result of the new ruling, the 9th Circuit ordered a new trial of the antitrust battle between the pharmaceutical majors over the agreements and pricing for an Abbott drug called Norvir. While an Abott spokeswoman said the company is reviewing its options, SmithKline said in a statement that the company was pleased with the “well reasoned” ruling.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Abbott’s aggressive pricing of the drug essential for HIV patients had drawn furious protests from the gay community. The company had denied that it had ill motives in removing the gay juror, but the case created an opportunity to test the scope of the Supreme Court’s ruling invalidating the DOMA, as well as putting to test the decision in Batson v. Kentucky where the Supreme Court had held jurors could not be barred based on race.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

Adler & Colvin is a seventeen-attorney, nationally-known San Francisco firm that exclusively advises...

Apply now

Trusts and Estates Attorney (Sacramento)

USA-CA-Sacramento

Annual Salary: 110k-135k DOE base and potential bonuses Trust and Estates Attorney The Bu...

Apply now

In-House Counsel - Financial Services

USA-WI-Racine

Through its people and brands, CNH Industrial delivers power, technology and innovation to farmers, ...

Apply now

Trademark Paralegal

USA-FL-Miami

MAVEN IP is looking for a detail-oriented full-time paralegal assistant with experience and kno...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Insurance Defense Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-Garland

Garland office of our client seeks insurance defense litigation attorney with 5-8 years of experienc...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Associate Attorney

USA-LA-New Orleans

New Orleans office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks labor and employment associate...

Apply Now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Walnut Creek

Walnut Creek office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks associate attorney with 1-4 y...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top