Legal News

9th Circuit Rules Gays and Lesbians to Not Be Prevented from Jury Service
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In a decision with widespread significance, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled this week that it was unconstitutional to exclude jurors based on sexual orientation as it is also unconstitutional to exclude women and minorities from juries.

Writing on behalf of the 9th Circuit, Judge Stephen Reinhardt observed that excluding prospective jurors based on their sexual orientation is a “deplorable tradition of treating gays and lesbians as undeserving of participation in our nation’s most cherished rites and rituals.”

  
What
Where


The unanimous three-judge panel observed that such biases “deprive individuals of the opportunity to participate in perfecting democracy and guarding our ideals of justice on account of a characteristic that has nothing to do with their fitness to serve.”

The issue came to fore in the high-profile legal battle between Abbot Laboratories and SmithKline Beecham in a 2011 federal antitrust trial in Oakland. SmithKline’s legal team alleged that Abbott had removed a gay juror because the trial involved a claim of Abbott inflating the price of a crucial HIV treatment drug.

As a result of the new ruling, the 9th Circuit ordered a new trial of the antitrust battle between the pharmaceutical majors over the agreements and pricing for an Abbott drug called Norvir. While an Abott spokeswoman said the company is reviewing its options, SmithKline said in a statement that the company was pleased with the “well reasoned” ruling.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Abbott’s aggressive pricing of the drug essential for HIV patients had drawn furious protests from the gay community. The company had denied that it had ill motives in removing the gay juror, but the case created an opportunity to test the scope of the Supreme Court’s ruling invalidating the DOMA, as well as putting to test the decision in Batson v. Kentucky where the Supreme Court had held jurors could not be barred based on race.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney with motions experience

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office of our client seeks mid-level litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience, inclu...

Apply Now

Environmental /Land Use Attorney with 2-3 years of experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks environmental /land use attorney with 2-3 years of experien...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 2-5 years of insurance defense experience

USA-FL-Jacksonville

Jacksonville office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 2-5 years of previous insurance def...

Apply Now

Attorney with 5+ years of complex litigation experience

USA-MI-Detroit

Detroit office of our client seeks attorney with 5+ years of complex litigation experience. The cand...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Legal Assistant / Receptionist

USA-IA-Ames

Legal Assistant / Receptionist. Pasley & Singer Law Firm seeks applicants who are professional, orga...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-LA-Lake Charles

We are looking for a full time legal assistant with plaintiff personal injury litigation experience ...

Apply now

Severe Injury Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

We will be interviewing for a new attorney.   If interested, please provide your resume and a c...

Apply now

Help Desk Analyst

USA-NY-White Plains

Jackson Lewis P.C. is an employment law firm that represents management exclusively in every aspect ...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top