Legal News

Australian Senator Proposes Full Face Covering Ban
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: A Tasmanian senator proposed a bill banning full face coverings during times of extreme threat of terrorist attack.

The Senator of Tasmania, Jacqui Lambie has introduced a bill that would make it illegal to wear full face coverings like burqas in public starting immediately. The nationwide ban would only be activated when the country’s National Terrorism Threat Advisory System increases the chances of a terror attack to “probable,” “expected,” or “certain.”


The bill would only allow the full face coverings to be worn in a public place with “good reason.” A good reason is for entertainment, work and artistic purposes. Things like helmets, niqabs, masks, balaclavas, burqas, and other facial coverings what would instill “unnecessary fear with the Australian general public would be illegal in the country. Lambie used the examples of the countries France, Turkey, and Belgium and their laws banning face coverings in public places.

Lambie also included an amendment to the 1995 Criminal Code Act, making it illegal to require someone else, an adult or child, to wear a full face covering. She is also asking the government to introduce a nationwide ban on all “identity concealing garments” except when there is a “reasonable and lawful excuse.”

Lambie explained, “Gone are the easy days of the past where we knew and trusted our neighbors and left our back doors unlocked.” She went on to say, “Full face coverings conceal the identity of the wearer, disrupting the authorities’ ability to track down a perpetrator in the event of a crime.” She believes that banning full face coverings will stop people from committing crimes and making it easier to identify suspicious people.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

She does not believe that the ban limits religious freedom, arguing that the right to feel safe in public places during times of extreme terrorism is more important than religious freedoms. She also hopes it would encourage people from all backgrounds to assimilate and have “open communication.”

Do you think it is reasonable to ban full face coverings during times of extreme threat from terrorism? Tell us in the comments below.

To learn more about full face covering bans, read these articles:



Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Senior Level Litigator

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

Woodland Hills office is seeking a litigation attorney with 5-7 years of experience and a background...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Stamford office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MO-Saint Louis

Saint Louis office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 2-5 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Insurance Coverage Associate Attorney


Washington, D.C. office of our client seeks insurance coverage associate attorney with 3-5 years of ...

Apply Now


Associate Counsel


Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB) is seeking an Associate Co...

Apply now

Law Student Intern


2nd-3rd year law student. Must have interest in real estate law! Position will include the following...

Apply now

Director of Enforcement


DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT POSITION AVAILABLE The Fair Housing Rights Center in Southeastern Pennsyl...

Apply now



Looking for Paralegal / Legal Assistants for our busy office in Orange, Ca. Must be bilingual in Eng...

Apply now


To Top