Legal News

Shuttered New Jersey Law Firm Sues Wells Fargo
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

2011-11-22_Wells_Fargo_ATMs_lit_at_night

Summary: In a new lawsuit, a robo-signing law firm blames Wells Fargo for its financial woes. 

A now defunct law firm is suing Wells Fargo for its collapse. Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman helped the notoriously shady bank foreclose on thousands of mortgages, but the bank allegedly delayed paying for service, which resulted in the firm’s demise.

  
What
Where


New Jersey’s Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman was known for its “robo-signing,” a term used for automated document creation. According to the Wall Street Journal, it was one of several high-volume firms that had bank clients; and after consumer advocates and the government called for mortgage industry changes, the robo-signing law firms suffered.

In its lawsuit, the firm said that after the regulations, lenders unfairly passed the responsibility of enforcement onto firms.

“Because foreclosure law is significantly impacted by economic conditions, government regulations and the condition of the lending industry, it has always been difficult for [the law firm] to control its own destiny,” Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman said.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




According to the lawsuit, Wells Fargo hired Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman to file court pleadings, ensure compliance, and research information about individual foreclosure cases. The two parties also agreed that the firm would advance any foreclosure-related expenses and Wells Fargo would later reimburse them.

In 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court cracked down on robo-signing. It called for banks to show that they were properly submitting details before they could foreclose on houses, and those details included internal policies. Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman said that Wells Fargo delayed responding to court orders so the law firm advanced a large sum of their own money, which ruined them financially.



The law firm said that Wells Fargo also stiffed them on $2.5 million in work fees.

Wells Fargo has responded to the suit, saying that it “should not be viewed as credible.” It denied owing $2.5 million.

The firm laid off the majority of its 335 lawyers last year, and it filed for bankruptcy on Aug. 3, 2015. The firm is represented by attorney Daniel M. Stolz, who is fighting to pay back the firms’ $30 million debt.

U.S. bankruptcy judge Christine Gravelle has set a hearing for this case for December 21.

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Photo courtesy of Wikimedia



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Junior Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Dallas office of our client, a Chambers ranked law firm, is actively seeking associates to join our ...

Apply Now

Investment Funds Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client is seeking a mid-level attorney with hedge fund, private equity, ...

Apply Now

Intellectual property litigation attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco AmLaw office is seeking an intellectual property litigation attorney with 2-5 years of...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Administrative Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Do you organize the social events for friends, family and co-workers? Are you someone who self-i...

Apply now

Intellectual Property Counsel – Prosecution

USA-MA-Brookline

Intellectual Property Counsel – Prosecution Dana Farber Cancer Institute Brookline, MA ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Walnut Creek

Statewide Applicants law firm looking for associate attorney to manage and handle significant caselo...

Apply now

Attorney, Child Welfare & Legal Advocacy

USA-CA-Oakland

NCYL seeks an Attorney to work on impact litigation and policy initiatives on behalf of children and...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top