Celebrity News

Lawsuit Claims Katie Couric Created Misleading Gun Control Documentary
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Screen Shot 2016-09-14 at 1.39.21 PM

Summary: A gun rights group is suing Katie Couric for their alleged “misleading” portrayal in her documentary, “Under the Gun.”

Is there really a liberal media bias? One recent lawsuit seems to support that argument. It alleges that high-profile TV journalist Katie Couric edited a documentary to make it seem like a pro-gun group was ignorant to a gun control question when that was not the case.


According to Fox News, Virginians Citizens Defense League agreed to be interviewed for Couric and director Stephanie Soechtig’s 2016 documentary “Under the Gun.” In their $12 million lawsuit, they said they were edited to appear stumped whenever Couric asked them, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?” They said that they in fact gave an answer, but that answer was not aired.

VCDF released audio proving that they immediately answered the question, although in the documentary, they were shown to be silent for almost 10 seconds. In their lawsuit, they said Couric and Soechtig “knowingly and maliciously” made them look bad. They said that the filmmakers had instructed them to be silent for ten seconds for “equipment calibration,” but that waiting-around footage was used in the film.

Phillip Van Cleave, the president of VCDL, spoke to Fox News about his group’s allegedly false portrayal.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“Katie Couric has publicly admitted that the film, which was presented to VCDL as a ‘documentary,’ was misleading and misrepresented VCDL,” Van Cleave said.

Van Cleave said that despite the admission, Couric and the filmmakers refused to fix the portion and continue to promote the inaccurate movie. Van Cleave said that a lawsuit was a last resort and that the lawsuit was the only way to hold Couric accountable.

Director Soechtig admitted to The Washington Post that the pause was added, but she said it was to help viewers consider the question being asked.

Couric expressed regrets not showing the VCDL answer, but she has not yet released a statement about the lawsuit.

“VCDL members have a right for their answers to be shared and so we have posted a transcript of their responses here. I regret that those eight seconds were misleading and that I did not raise my initial concerns more vigorously,” Couric said in May.

Do you think Couric and the filmmakers maliciously tried to misrepresent VCDL? Let us know in the comments below.

Source: Fox News


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Commercial Litigation Counsel with Portable Business


Detroit area office is seeking a counsel level commercial litigation attorney with $200,000+ in port...

Apply Now

Senior Labor and Employment Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks senior labor and employment litigation associate attorney wit...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney


Washington, D.C. office of our client, a Chambers ranked law firm, is actively seeking associates to...

Apply Now


Associate Family and Criminal Law Attorney

USA-TX-Harker Heights

Bobby Dale Barina is looking for an entry level family and criminal law attorney to join our firm. T...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney


Justice Catalyst Law seeks an Impact Litigation Attorney to litigate impact cases that cross boundar...

Apply now

Family Law Attorney

USA-FL-Boca Raton

Do you have a practice encompassing marital and family law?  Are you becoming overwhelmed with ...

Apply now

Customer Service & Support


Relevant Law, a new legal services company, is seeking a customer service agent to assist our Lynchb...

Apply now


To Top