Legal News

Court Rules Attorney Cannot Collect $9 Billion Chevron Win
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

The logo of Dow Jones Industrial Average stock market index listed company Chevron (CVX) is seen in Los Angeles, California, United States, April 12, 2016. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo - RTX2J69C

Photo courtesy of Reuters. 

Summary: An appeals court has ruled that Chevron does not need to pay a $9 billion judgment to the plaintiffs of an Ecuadoran pollution case. 

Imagine winning billions of dollars only to have it snatched away before you could even touch one of the bills. That’s what happened to attorney Steven Donzinger and his clients.


After winning $9 billion from the Chevron Corporation, lawyer Steven Donziger learned this week that he will not be able to collect. This decision was ruled on Monday by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

According to ABA Journal, “A federal appeals court has upheld a federal judge’s decision to block enforcement of a $9 billion Ecuadorian judgment against Chevron Corp. after determining the award was the product of bribery, coercion and fraud.”

Donzinger represented Ecuadorian plaintiffs who sued Chevron because of alleged environmental damage during oil explorations. They won a $9 billion judgment, which Chevron appealed, stating that justice had been “perverted” in the case.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Donzinger had spent almost two decades working on the case, Reuters said.

In March of 2014, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that Donzinger’s win was not valid. He had found a RICO violation, which included ghostwriting the Ecuadorian judgment and bribing a judge $500,000 with laundered money. Kaplan also found that an expert witness was portrayed to not be knowledgeable, and Kaplan stated that there was an obstruction of justice in the case.

On Monday, a second appeals court devastated Donzinger and his clients, by upholding Kaplan’s ruling. In the 2nd Circuit Court opinion, evidence of wrongdoing by Donzinger and his legal team was documented as well as Kaplan’s findings which were undisputed.

“Even innocent clients may not benefit from the fraud of their attorney,” Circuit Judge Amalya Kearse wrote.

Donzinger’s attorney Deepak Gupta said they are reviewing next steps.

What do you think of this case? Let us know in the comments below.

Source: ABA Journal, Reuters



Jr Paralegal


C2 ALASKA Philadelphia, PA   The Paralegal I shall provide legal research an...

Apply now

Family Law Attorney


What does an Attorney do at MFL? Perform consultations with potential clients and retain them ...

Apply now

Family Law Attorney

USA-CA-San Jose

Why we think we’re the best… Here are some highlights of our amazing culture, perks, ...

Apply now

Estate Planning Paralegal


About Landerholm, P.S. Since 1948, the attorneys and professionals at Landerholm, P.S. have serve...

Apply now




Search Now

BCG Attorney Search In-House Counsel

USA-CA-Los Angeles

BCG Attorney Search In-House Counsel We are a Legal Employment Company located in California with o...

Apply Now

FDA Regulatory Attorney


Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks FDA regulatory attorney with 3-4 ye...

Apply Now

Foreclosure/Bankruptcy Associate Attorney


Temecula office of our client seeks associate attorney with preferably 2 years of experience working...

Apply Now


To Top