Breaking News

Judge Rules Mississippi Religious Freedom Law Unconstitutional
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: A judge has ruled that Mississippi’s discriminatory religious liberty law was unconstitutional. 

Mississippi’s religious freedom law has been declared unconstitutional. The law, HB 1523, allowed people to deny services to customers based on their religious views. Critics argued that this law discriminated against LGBT individuals.


According to NPR, the state’s governor Phil Bryant said he would appeal the judge’s ruling, but the attorney general Jim Hood advised not to move forward. Under HB 1523, Mississippi locals could decline medical services to gay couples, refuse to serve a gay wedding, or fire employees based on their religious affiliations. Judge Carlton Reeves said that state employees were not allowed to deny marriage licenses to gay couples, as same-sex marriage is federally legal.

Yesterday, Reeves added that the law in general violated the First Amendment by promoting specific religious beliefs over other views, mainly that marriage is between a man and a woman , that sex is between a man and a woman, and that people should be determined by their birth anatomy and genetics. Reeves said that there are some heads of religious groups who do not denounce homosexuality or transgender people.

“There are almost endless explanations for how HB 1523 condones discrimination against the LGBT community, but in its simplest terms it denies LGBT citizens equal protection under the law,” Reeves wrote.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Reeves added that religious people are already protected under the First Amendment and Mississippi’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. He said HB 1523, which allows people protection from lawsuits if they deny services based on their faith, was not necessary.

Proponents of HB 1523 said it was created to protect them, but Attorney General Hood said that even before the law, religious leaders were never required to marry gay couples if they did not want to. He added that litigating this law is expensive and appealing would just add unnecessary cost to the state’s budget crisis.

Do you think HB 1523 is necessary to protect religious freedom? Let us know in the comments below.

Source: NPR


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Civil Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Coral Gables

Coral Gables office of our client seeks civil litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experie...

Apply Now

Family Law Attorney


Ogden office of our client seeks family law attorney with 2+ years of experience. The candidate will...

Apply Now

Insurance Defense Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Boca Raton

Boca Raton office of our client seeks attorney with 5+ years of insurance defense litigation experie...

Apply Now


Associate Attorney


Attorneys helping people........Brayton Purcell LLP is an extremely busy plaintiff\'s litigation pra...

Apply now

Casualty Attorney II


Kuluva, Armijo & Garcia is seeking an experienced and skilled California litigator for the position ...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Small, real estate transactional and litigation law firm seeks EXPERIENCED part-time legal assistant...

Apply now

Mediation Coordinator

USA-NY-New York City

The Civil Appeals Mediation Program (“CAMP”) for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals inv...

Apply now


To Top