Breaking News

Judge Rules Mississippi Religious Freedom Law Unconstitutional
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: A judge has ruled that Mississippi’s discriminatory religious liberty law was unconstitutional. 

Mississippi’s religious freedom law has been declared unconstitutional. The law, HB 1523, allowed people to deny services to customers based on their religious views. Critics argued that this law discriminated against LGBT individuals.


According to NPR, the state’s governor Phil Bryant said he would appeal the judge’s ruling, but the attorney general Jim Hood advised not to move forward. Under HB 1523, Mississippi locals could decline medical services to gay couples, refuse to serve a gay wedding, or fire employees based on their religious affiliations. Judge Carlton Reeves said that state employees were not allowed to deny marriage licenses to gay couples, as same-sex marriage is federally legal.

Yesterday, Reeves added that the law in general violated the First Amendment by promoting specific religious beliefs over other views, mainly that marriage is between a man and a woman , that sex is between a man and a woman, and that people should be determined by their birth anatomy and genetics. Reeves said that there are some heads of religious groups who do not denounce homosexuality or transgender people.

“There are almost endless explanations for how HB 1523 condones discrimination against the LGBT community, but in its simplest terms it denies LGBT citizens equal protection under the law,” Reeves wrote.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Reeves added that religious people are already protected under the First Amendment and Mississippi’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. He said HB 1523, which allows people protection from lawsuits if they deny services based on their faith, was not necessary.

Proponents of HB 1523 said it was created to protect them, but Attorney General Hood said that even before the law, religious leaders were never required to marry gay couples if they did not want to. He added that litigating this law is expensive and appealing would just add unnecessary cost to the state’s budget crisis.

Do you think HB 1523 is necessary to protect religious freedom? Let us know in the comments below.

Source: NPR


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

General Municipal Law Attorney with land use experience


Oakland office of our client seeks general municipal law attorney with experience advising public ag...

Apply Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business


McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with 4+ years of experience


Chicago office of our client seeks commercial litigation attorney with 4+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now




The practice of law can be rewarding, especially when one is encouraged to achieve a balance between...

Apply now

Legal Secretary

USA-NY-Garden City

LEGAL SECRETARY Garden City Law Firm. Exp with Mat / Gen practice. Proficient in MS Word & T/Slips. ...

Apply now

Medical Paralegal


Established Tahoe-Truckee-Reno law firm seeks full-time assistant with two or more years of proven b...

Apply now



Plaintiff’s personal injury firm in Charleston searching for a paralegal with at least two yea...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top