Legal News

In Vitro Fertilization Agreements Are Binding
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Frozen embryos

Summary: A San Francisco Judge has ruled that the agreement between a formerly married couple is legal, preventing one spouse from taking any frozen embryos when the other does not want them.

The frozen embryos of a divorced couple are to be destroyed, per their signed agreement while married. A Superior Court in San Francisco clarified that directives signed by the couple in question overrule the desires of the ex-wife.


Mimi Lee and her former husband Stephen Findley froze embryos soon after their September 2010 wedding when they discovered that she had breast cancer and was beginning treatments. Lee was 41 at the time, so with her advanced age and the anti-hormone medications for the cancer treatment, it was expected she would become infertile.

The couple underwent in vitro fertilization so they could preserve any chance of having biological children. Once fertilized, the embryos were frozen in liquid nitrogen to use at a future date. Unfortunately for Lee, the couple signed an agreement with the UCSF Center for Reproductive Health before the procedure, stating that the embryos would only be released to one of them if the other died. In the case of divorce or other circumstances then the embryos would be destroyed.

In 2013, Findley filed for divorce, but Lee still wanted to have the opportunity for biological children. She claims the agreement is not binding and violates her right to procreate. However, with the emerging reproductive technologies involving frozen embryos in California and cases where one person wants them and the other person doesn’t, signed agreements have to be respected.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

As one Beverly Hills attorney put it, “The fact that material is cryogenically preserved should not give one party the ability to force the other into unwanted parenthood or to have to relinquish their right to their biological child.”





Family Law Attorney - Starting at $100,000 (DOE) + Bonuses & Perks - KEY ROLE - REMOTE


Are you passionate about fighting and advocating for your clients? Do you have vision and talent ...

Apply now


USA-NJ-Cedar Knolls

Defense lawfirm seeking full time paralegal with medical malpractice experience.  Some tasks in...

Apply now

Real Estate Paralegal

USA-NY-New York City

Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP is a midsize law firm in New York City actively seeking an...

Apply now

Mid/Senior Level Associate for IP Litigation Boutique

USA-NY-New York City

Lewis & Lin LLC, a small Internet Law and IP Boutique located in Brooklyn, NY seeks mid- to senior-l...

Apply now




Search Now

Corporate Associate Attorney


Philadelphia office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate associate attorney ...

Apply Now

Corporate Associate Attorney

USA-PA-King of Prussia

King of Prussia office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate associate attorn...

Apply Now

Family Law Attorney


Denver office of our client seeks family law attorney with 5+ years of experience. The candidate wil...

Apply Now


To Top