Breaking News

First Lethal Drug Execution since Glossip v. Gross
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

David Zink execution

Summary: State lawyers and the US Supreme Court made it clear in the dismissal of Zink’s appeals that citing Breyer’s dissent wasn’t a valid argument to be saved from the death penalty.

David Zink’s final chance to appeal his death sentence was turned down by the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday night. His execution was at 6 pm. Zink was found guilty for abducting, sexually assaulting and murdering a 19-year-old woman in 2001. Missouri Governor Jay Nixon turned down his request for clemency as well. The Supreme Court did not comment or dissent on the multiple appeals from his lawyers, Elizabeth Carlyle and Richard Sindel.

  
What
Where


His lawyers had tried to get U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer on their side after he dissented the recent death penalty ruling. Breyer views the death penalty as unconstitutional because there is no way of knowing how effective the lethal injection drugs are at preventing the individual from feeling pain.

In the Glossip v. Gross ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of the using the drugs for lethal injections and thus making the death penalty being constitutional. Breyer’s dissent included the factors of long delay, arbitrariness, and the possibility of innocence in some that have been executed as reasons that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment.

In the petition, Carlyle wrote “The death penalty has become a source of error and bias. It is time to end ‘tinkering with the machinery of death’ and declare it unconstitutional once and for all.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster urged the Supreme Court to reject Zink’s appeal in a brief he filed Tuesday morning. He stated in the brief that “If Zink really believed the Glossip would impact the outcome of his case, he would have filed his motion two weeks ago when Glossip was decided.”

Source: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/home/id=1202732062420/Supreme-Court-Rejects-Plea-to-Strike-Down-Death-Penalty



Photo: cnn.com



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Litigator with 5-10 years of general insurance defense experience

USA-FL-West Palm Beach

Boutique litigation firm is looking for an experienced litigator with 5-10 years of general insuranc...

Apply Now

Transactional Real Estate Attorney with 4-10 years of experience

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office is seeking a transactional real estate attorney with 4-10 years of experience.

Apply Now

Real Estate/Business Transaction Attorney with 8+ years of experience

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office is seeking a real estate & business transaction attorney with 8+ years of experience....

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Labor and Employment Attorney

USA-CA-Sacramento

Labor & Employment law firm in Sacramento is seeking an attorney with at least 5 years of labor & em...

Apply now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-NY-Bronx

Expanding Bronx / NYC matrimonial and family law firm seeks matrimonial / criminal attorney, bilingu...

Apply now

Legal Secretary

USA-CA-Santa Ana

SUMMARY: Trovillion, Inveiss & Demakis, a workers’ compensation law firm, seeks a highly or...

Apply now

Billing Specialist

USA-CA-San Diego

SUMMARY: Trovillion, Inveiss & Demakis, a workers’ compensation law firm, seeks a highly ef...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top