Virginia Billed for Same-Sex Marriage Ban Battle
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: The same-sex marriage ban fight in the state of Virginia will cost the commonwealth $520,000 in lawyers fees and costs. 

The commonwealth of Virginia is on the hook for a $520,000 bill for lawyers used to successfully challenge the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, according to The National Law Journal.


Of the $520,000, $459,000 of it will be paid to Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

A settlement was filed Wednesday in federal district court in Alexandria.

To read more about Gibson Dunn, click here.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The two firms working the case, Gibson Dunn and Shuttleworth, Ruloff, Swain, Haddad & Morecock originally billed more than $1.7 million for time and costs.

The other firm that worked the case, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, were not named in the settlement.

Theodore Olson, from Gibson Dunn, and David Boies of Boies Schiller, combined to challenge the same-sex marriage ban in California a couple of years ago. They ran the case against Virginia for the plaintiffs.

In February of 2014, U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen ruled that the same-sex marriage ban in Virginia was unconstitutional. The decision was upheld in July by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

To read more law firm news stories, click here.

Records documenting some 2,372 hours worked on the case were submitted to the court by Gibson Dunn and Shuttleworth. The records totaled $1,738,645 in attorney fees and $5,422 in costs. The total requested by the firms also represented “voluntary reductions” made by the firms.

The court was told the following by the lawyers for the plaintiffs and the commonwealth:

“The parties to this settlement agreement continue to dispute the billing rates and charges to which plaintiffs are entitled. But the parties acknowledge the uncertainty and risks to each party associated with litigating a fee petition submitted by plaintiffs, and the range of possible outcomes with regard to the quantum of fees sought. Acknowledging further the legal costs and expense associated with litigating these issues, Rainey and plaintiffs have agreed to resolve their differences through this settlement agreement, each term of which is material to the parties’ willingness to enter into it.”

Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe needs to approve the agreement.

Will this settlement be approved by the governor? Use our poll to share your thoughts.

Will McAuliffe approve this settlement?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...



Associate Litigation Attorney


The Law Offices of Samer Habbas is a high-volume, fast-paced firm seeking a motivated and driven att...

Apply now

Civil Litigation Paralegal


A rapidly growing personal injury law firm is seeking a highly organized, experienced litigation par...

Apply now

Associate Attorney- Litigation


About the Job: Established AV-rated Missoula law firm is seeking an articulate and ambitious asso...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal


About the Job: Established AV-rated Missoula law firm is seeking a full-time Litigation Paralegal...

Apply now




Search Now

Real Estate Attorney


Parsippany office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks real estate attorney with 5 yea...

Apply Now

Corporate Advisory Associate Attorney


Chicago office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate advisory associate attor...

Apply Now

Trademark and Copyright Portfolio Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a trademark and copyright po...

Apply Now


To Top