Legal News

Ruling Could Prevent Lawyers from Switching Firms Due to Bankruptcy
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Partners working at struggling law firms could find the ability to switch firms a little more difficult in the future due to a recent ruling, according to the Wall Street Journal. Hiring firms have been subject to claims of “unfinished business” when a lawyer joins from a bankrupt firm. This means that the assets from the work, once completed, belong to the firm that closed.

A ruling issued in February says that partners leaving a law firm prior to it actually dissolving have the responsibility of returning profits made from unfinished legal work to their old firm. The ruling was issued in the case of Howrey LLP, which is now defunct.

  
What
Where


The ruling was issued on February 7 by California Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali. Judge Montali said, “there is no reason to limit the definition of Howrey unfinished business to matters pending as of dissolution.”

With the ruling, Judge Montali permitted bankruptcy trustee Allan B. Diamond to try and recoup profits from work firms that hired partners from Howrey before the firm collapsed.

Diamond noted that the ruling is consistent with the idea that partners should be loyal and should put the interests of the partnership ahead of their own.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




“Otherwise,” he said, “at the first sign of a partnership in trouble, every partner, clients permitting, would leave with his or her unfinished business, to the likely detriment of one’s partnership.”

Law firms have long argued that clients should be allowed to bring their business wherever they choose and that lawsuits restrict the mobility of lawyers. Lawyers also contend that filing claims to have profits returned on work that would not have been completed is incorrectly applying a ruling from a case in California back in 1984.



In that case, contingency fees were divided after a law firm with four partners dissolved. The firm was called Jewel, Boxer & Elkind.

“He [the judge] has this idea that if you leave a law firm…and take the client with you, then the old firm has the right to all the profits on that business,” Robert Mittelstaedt, a partner from Jones Day, said about the Howrey ruling. “He is almost treating the clients as chattel.”



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney with motions experience

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office of our client seeks mid-level litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience, inclu...

Apply Now

Environmental /Land Use Attorney with 2-3 years of experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks environmental /land use attorney with 2-3 years of experien...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 2-5 years of insurance defense experience

USA-FL-Jacksonville

Jacksonville office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 2-5 years of previous insurance def...

Apply Now

Junior to Mid-level Trademark Attorney with counseling experience

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office of our client seeks junior to mid-level trademark attorney with preferably 2+ years o...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Managing Director, Litigation Finance Investments

USA-FL-Tampa

Title                ...

Apply now

Contract Associate

USA-CA-Sausalito

Seeking lawyer with at least 2 yrs experience in complex real estate transactional matters, with wil...

Apply now

Associate

USA-NY-Syracuse

Our Syracuse, NY office seeks an Associate with 3-5 years experience defending general liabilit...

Apply now

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney Needed

USA-NY-Bohemia

Insurance Defense firm (with 15 attorneys in Suffolk and Mineola location), seeks attorneys with 5+ ...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top