Legal News

Ruling Could Prevent Lawyers from Switching Firms Due to Bankruptcy
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Partners working at struggling law firms could find the ability to switch firms a little more difficult in the future due to a recent ruling, according to the Wall Street Journal. Hiring firms have been subject to claims of “unfinished business” when a lawyer joins from a bankrupt firm. This means that the assets from the work, once completed, belong to the firm that closed.

A ruling issued in February says that partners leaving a law firm prior to it actually dissolving have the responsibility of returning profits made from unfinished legal work to their old firm. The ruling was issued in the case of Howrey LLP, which is now defunct.

  
What
Where


The ruling was issued on February 7 by California Bankruptcy Judge Dennis Montali. Judge Montali said, “there is no reason to limit the definition of Howrey unfinished business to matters pending as of dissolution.”

With the ruling, Judge Montali permitted bankruptcy trustee Allan B. Diamond to try and recoup profits from work firms that hired partners from Howrey before the firm collapsed.

Diamond noted that the ruling is consistent with the idea that partners should be loyal and should put the interests of the partnership ahead of their own.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




“Otherwise,” he said, “at the first sign of a partnership in trouble, every partner, clients permitting, would leave with his or her unfinished business, to the likely detriment of one’s partnership.”

Law firms have long argued that clients should be allowed to bring their business wherever they choose and that lawsuits restrict the mobility of lawyers. Lawyers also contend that filing claims to have profits returned on work that would not have been completed is incorrectly applying a ruling from a case in California back in 1984.



In that case, contingency fees were divided after a law firm with four partners dissolved. The firm was called Jewel, Boxer & Elkind.

“He [the judge] has this idea that if you leave a law firm…and take the client with you, then the old firm has the right to all the profits on that business,” Robert Mittelstaedt, a partner from Jones Day, said about the Howrey ruling. “He is almost treating the clients as chattel.”



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a mid-level litigation attorney with experience taking/defending dep...

Apply Now

Trust and Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Boutique trust and estate firm is seeking an attorney with 7+ years of experience. Candidate should ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a support attorney with some experience/familiarity with a litigatio...

Apply Now

In House Counsel with Transactional Energy Experience

USA-NY-New York City

New York City company is seeking an in house counsel with knowledge of the oil / energy industry. Ca...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 3 to 5 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Litigation Attorney   Dallas, TX One of Texas\' largest Personal Injury Law Firms se...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top