Breaking News

Senate Nixes Rule That Allows Consumers to Sue Banks and Credit Card Companies
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Wells Fargo

Summary: The Senate has voted to end the CFPB rule that barred mandatory arbitration clauses from financial companies.

This week, the Republican-majority Senate voted to remove a rule that allowed consumers to bring class-action lawsuits against banks and credit card companies. The vote was narrowly passed 51-50 with Vice President Mike Pence casting the tie-breaking vote, according to NPR.


Starting in July, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had a rule that banned restrictive mandatory arbitration clauses in the fine print of credit card and financial account agreements. However, on Tuesday, the Senate voted to get rid of it. Without mandatory arbitration agreements, consumers were able to file class-action lawsuits against financial institutions to resolve disputes.

The House of Representatives, which is also GOP-controlled, has already voted yes on rescinding the rule, and President Donald Trump is scheduled to sign off on the measure soon. As part of the vote, no similar rules will be allowed in the future.

The rule was released in July, and its purpose was to give consumers more power. The CFPB said that banning mandatory arbitration clauses prevented companies from avoiding refunds and continuing harmful practices. CFPB Director Richard Cordray told NPR that “Wall Street won and ordinary people lost.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“Tonight’s vote is a giant setback for every consumer in this country,” Cordray said. “As a result, companies like Wells Fargo and Equifax remain free to break the law without fear of legal blowback from their customers.”

The CFPB rule was a result of a study about arbitration agreements that was created after the Trump administration had tried to dismantle the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation earlier this year. Dodd-Frank was signed into effect during the Obama administration as a response to the 2007-2008 recession, and it regulated the financial industry.

Republicans pushed to repeal Dodd-Frank because they believe regulations hurt the free market. White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the CFPB’s rule “would harm our community banks and credit unions by opening the door to frivolous lawsuits by special interest trial lawyers.”

Democrats disagreed, stating the rule was needed to stop banks and credit card companies from abusive practices and forcing individuals to fight by themselves for refunds.

“This rule helped ensure that consumers are not forced to forfeit their rights in settling disputes with big banks and other financial firms and served as a powerful tool for consumers to hold financial institutions accountable,” Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan said to Business Insider.

The financial industry said that the CFPB rule encouraged lawyers to shake down companies, raising costs which in turn were put on consumers.

“Now, arbitration is a widely accepted method of resolving disputes between consumers and banks and other financial institutions,” GOP Sen. John Cornyn said. “And it actually increases the benefit that flows to the consumer, as opposed to the alternative, which is class-action lawsuits, which enriches lawyers where consumers get pennies on the dollar.”

What do you think of the CFPB rule? Let us know in the comments below.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Litigation Trial Attorney with 3-5 years of pleading experience


Seattle office of our client seeks litigation trial attorney with 3-5 years of experience. The candi...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney with mergers and acquisitions experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking a corporate attorney with 1-6 years of M&A, corporate finance, securit...

Apply Now

Staff Attorney with 4-6 years of trademark and litigation experience


Philadelphia office of our client seeks staff attorney ideally with 4-6 years of trademark prosecuti...

Apply Now

Patent Prosecution Associate


Chicago office of our client seeks patent prosecution associate with experience. The candidate shoul...

Apply Now


Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT


Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington


Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Litigation Associate

USA-NY-New York City

Midtown Manhattan litigation boutique with diverse civil litigation practice seeking associate with ...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top