Legal News

Judge Blocks Anthem-Cigna Merger
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: Citing antitrust issues, a federal judge has blocked the merger between two major health insurance agencies. 

On Wednesday, Judge Amy Berman Jackson blocked a proposed $48 billion merger between healthcare giants, Anthem and Cigna. The company’s potential union could have significantly reshaped the industry, but according to Jackson and the Department of Justice, the deal would have harmed customers.


“The evidence has also shown that the merger is likely to result in higher prices, and that it will have other anticompetitive effects,” Judge Jackson wrote. “It will eliminate the two firms’ vigorous competition against each other for national accounts, reduce the number of national carriers available to respond to solicitations in the future, and diminish the prospects for innovation in the market.”

Leading up to this decision, the merger proceedings between Anthem and Cigna had not been a smooth process, according to The New York Times. Last year, court documents stated that the two had accused each other of breach of contract. Nevertheless, the health insurance giants stated that they wanted to move forward and that their combining would offer billions of savings to consumers.

However, the company’s conflicts raised concern for the Justice Department and Judge Jackson, who said that customers would not be able to benefit from their merger because of the fighting.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“Anthem urges the court to look away, and it attempts to minimize the merging parties’ differences as a ‘side issue,’ a mere ‘rift between the C.E.O.’s,” Judge Jackson wrote. “But the court cannot properly ignore the remarkable circumstances that have unfolded both before and during the trial.”

The merger between Anthem and Cigna were announced a year and a half ago, and it came as a response to changes in the market brought upon by the Affordable Care Act. The reasoning being that if Anthem and Cigna combined that they would have more clout negotiating with hospitals, which have also been merging over the years.

Judge Jackson’s ruling came two weeks after another judge dismissed a $37 billion merger between Aetna and Humana. Like with Jackson’s decision, that judge cited antitrust issues. If Anthem and Cigna had been allowed to combine as well as Atena and Humana, there would have only been five major insurers left in the game.

Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch remarked on the potential mergers last summer and said that they would harm the market.

“If these mergers were to take place, the competition among insurers that has pushed them to provide lower premiums, higher-quality care and better benefits would be eliminated,” Lynch.

Source: New York Times

Do you think that the government should’ve blocked the merger between Cigna and Anthem? Let us know in the comments below.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Litigation Trial Attorney with 3-5 years of pleading experience


Seattle office of our client seeks litigation trial attorney with 3-5 years of experience. The candi...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney with mergers and acquisitions experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking a corporate attorney with 1-6 years of M&A, corporate finance, securit...

Apply Now

Estate Planning Attorney with 6+ years of experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking an experienced estate planning attorney with 6+ years of experience. C...

Apply Now

Condominium Associate Attorney


Chicago office of our client seeks condominium associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience. The ...

Apply Now


Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT


Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington


Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Litigation Associate

USA-NY-New York City

Midtown Manhattan litigation boutique with diverse civil litigation practice seeking associate with ...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top