Legal News

Lawyer Gets Bad Review, Sues Google, Not Reviewer
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: A lawyer is suing Google because the company didn’t remove a bad review.

No one likes bad reviews. However, few take the time to sue over them, and fewer sue the review platform instead of the writers themselves. But that’s not the case for one New Jersey attorney named Richard Kitrick. After receiving negative feedback online, he filed a defamation lawsuit against Google for not taking it down.


Kitrick claimed that he had never represented the author of the bad review. He said he contacted Google multiple times to remove the allegedly bogus post, but the tech company failed to comply so he filed a lawsuit in his home state. According to the lawsuit, Google’s Terms of Service say that it reserves the right to review and remove content that violates its policies, and one such policy is to not post “fake reviews.” Kitrick concluded that Google did not follow its own policies and therefore was liable for damages.

“Google profits from the slanderous statements that are negative and create controversy in that they encourage more use of the Google services,” the complaint obtained by Law360 said.

Kitrick wants the negative review to be removed as well as money for damages and legal fees. His complaint lists Google as a defendant as well as 10 Jane or John Does. Kitrick is representing himself.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

While Google has yet to respond to the allegations, First Amendment attorney Jack Greiner said Kitrick doesn’t have much of a case.

“Under the federal Communications Decency Act, an interactive computer service provider is not considered the publisher of third-party content. Here, Google is an interactive computer service provider and the content at issue – the allegedly bogus review – was provided by a third party. Google isn’t liable for it,” Greiner wrote on

Graphic courtesy of Google

Source: Law360

Do you think Kitrick has a case? Let us know in the comments below.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Attorney with 8 years of civil litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Westside law firm of our client is seeking an attorney with 8 years of civil litigation experience, ...

Apply Now

Senior Attorney with litigation experience

USA-NY-New York City

New York City non profit is seeking a senior litigation counsel to manage litigation strategy as wel...

Apply Now

IP Technical Advisor with 1-3 years of software experience


Alexandria office of our client seeks IP technical advisor with 1-3 years of experience in IP applic...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 3-5 years of employment discrimination experience


Melville office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience. The candidate ...

Apply Now


Public Law Associate Attorney (General Municipal Law, Real Estate, Transactions)

USA-CA-San Rafael

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP is seeking a skilled and motivated associate attorney with 1 to 3 ye...

Apply now

Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT


Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington


Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top