Legal News

Lawyer Gets Bad Review, Sues Google, Not Reviewer
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

unnamed

Summary: A lawyer is suing Google because the company didn’t remove a bad review.

No one likes bad reviews. However, few take the time to sue over them, and fewer sue the review platform instead of the writers themselves. But that’s not the case for one New Jersey attorney named Richard Kitrick. After receiving negative feedback online, he filed a defamation lawsuit against Google for not taking it down.

  
What
Where


Kitrick claimed that he had never represented the author of the bad review. He said he contacted Google multiple times to remove the allegedly bogus post, but the tech company failed to comply so he filed a lawsuit in his home state. According to the lawsuit, Google’s Terms of Service say that it reserves the right to review and remove content that violates its policies, and one such policy is to not post “fake reviews.” Kitrick concluded that Google did not follow its own policies and therefore was liable for damages.

“Google profits from the slanderous statements that are negative and create controversy in that they encourage more use of the Google services,” the complaint obtained by Law360 said.

Kitrick wants the negative review to be removed as well as money for damages and legal fees. His complaint lists Google as a defendant as well as 10 Jane or John Does. Kitrick is representing himself.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




While Google has yet to respond to the allegations, First Amendment attorney Jack Greiner said Kitrick doesn’t have much of a case.

“Under the federal Communications Decency Act, an interactive computer service provider is not considered the publisher of third-party content. Here, Google is an interactive computer service provider and the content at issue – the allegedly bogus review – was provided by a third party. Google isn’t liable for it,” Greiner wrote on Cincinnati.com.



Graphic courtesy of Google

Source: Law360

Do you think Kitrick has a case? Let us know in the comments below.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Commercial Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level commercial litigation associate attorney with 3+ yea...

Apply Now

E-Commerce, Privacy and Cybersecurity Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of an AmLaw firm seeks eCommerce, privacy and cybersecurity associate attorney ...

Apply Now

E-commerce, Privacy and Cybersecurity Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of an AmLaw firm seeks eCommerce, privacy and cybersecurity associate attorney ...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Paralegal

USA-CA-Pasadena

Job Summary: The Paralegal will be a part of the in-house legal team  and work on a variety...

Apply now

Legal Administrative Assistant

USA-WI-Milwaukee

von Briesen & Roper, s.c., one of Wisconsin’s leading law firms, recognized as a “Top Wo...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal

USA-CA-Covina

We are looking for an experienced litigation paralegal in the field of personal injury law who can t...

Apply now

Legal Department Manager

USA-CA-Visalia

Acclaim Credit Technologies is seeking full time individual for our legal department. Job requiremen...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top