Legal News

Supreme Court to Rule on Pivotal Insider Trading Case
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

insider-trading

Summary: On Wednesday, the federal Supreme Court will hear an insider trading case that will affect who can get prosecuted in the future. 

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear an insider trading case that many say have monumental consequences. According to Reuters, this is the first time in twenty years that the high court has heard such a case, which is typically left to the Securities and Exchange Commission to handle.

  
What
Where


On Wednesday, the eight justices will hear the case of Bassam Salman of Illinois. Prosecutors allege that he made nearly $1.2 million trading with insider information from his brother-in-law, who worked at Citigroup. He was convicted of securities fraud in 2014 and sentenced to three years in prison.

According to Reuters, the issue that is being closely watched is whether the government must prove in these types of cases that the person who gave the information received a tangible benefit like money for tips. Attorneys and prosecutors argue that proving tangible benefits would make it too difficult to pursue insider trading cases.

Salman said that his trading of Citigroup merger information was not illegal because there was no proof his brother-in-law received anything for the exchange. His argument was rejected by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, but that does not mean he will not try that defense in front of the Supreme Court.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Stephen Ascher, a lawyer at Jenner & Block, told Reuters that this ruling would define the rules of what actually violates the law. Over the past few six years, the SEC has been aggressive in cracking own on insider trading, but their efforts were stalled in December 2014 when a New York federal appeals court overturned the conviction of two hedge fund managers. The court said that a trader must know that the source received a benefit for the information for it to be illegal.

“I do think clarity is particularly important in this context, and right now there is a lack of clarity,” said Ascher. “The Supreme Court has the opportunity now to clean that up.”



Source: Reuters

Photo courtesy of SG Money Matters



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Workers' Compensation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Sacramento

Applicants law firm looking for associate attorney to manage and handle significant caseload. Compet...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-VA-Portsmouth

I need a full time paralegal with experience in family law or civil litigation, please call 757-615-...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-FL-Miami

C2 ALASKA Miami, FL   The Paralegal II shall provide legal research and liti...

Apply now

Senior Creditors’ Rights Counsel

USA-CA-Los Angeles

ALAW, an established, multi-state real estate and creditors’ rights law firm, is expanding to ...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

BCG Attorney Search In-House Counsel

USA-CA-Los Angeles

BCG Attorney Search In-House Counsel We are a Legal Employment Company located in California with o...

Apply Now

FDA Regulatory Attorney

USA-MA-Boston

Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks FDA regulatory attorney with 3-4 ye...

Apply Now

Foreclosure/Bankruptcy Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Temecula

Temecula office of our client seeks associate attorney with preferably 2 years of experience working...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top