Legal News

Supreme Court to Rule on Pivotal Insider Trading Case
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

insider-trading

Summary: On Wednesday, the federal Supreme Court will hear an insider trading case that will affect who can get prosecuted in the future. 

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear an insider trading case that many say have monumental consequences. According to Reuters, this is the first time in twenty years that the high court has heard such a case, which is typically left to the Securities and Exchange Commission to handle.

  
What
Where


On Wednesday, the eight justices will hear the case of Bassam Salman of Illinois. Prosecutors allege that he made nearly $1.2 million trading with insider information from his brother-in-law, who worked at Citigroup. He was convicted of securities fraud in 2014 and sentenced to three years in prison.

According to Reuters, the issue that is being closely watched is whether the government must prove in these types of cases that the person who gave the information received a tangible benefit like money for tips. Attorneys and prosecutors argue that proving tangible benefits would make it too difficult to pursue insider trading cases.

Salman said that his trading of Citigroup merger information was not illegal because there was no proof his brother-in-law received anything for the exchange. His argument was rejected by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, but that does not mean he will not try that defense in front of the Supreme Court.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Stephen Ascher, a lawyer at Jenner & Block, told Reuters that this ruling would define the rules of what actually violates the law. Over the past few six years, the SEC has been aggressive in cracking own on insider trading, but their efforts were stalled in December 2014 when a New York federal appeals court overturned the conviction of two hedge fund managers. The court said that a trader must know that the source received a benefit for the information for it to be illegal.

“I do think clarity is particularly important in this context, and right now there is a lack of clarity,” said Ascher. “The Supreme Court has the opportunity now to clean that up.”



Source: Reuters

Photo courtesy of SG Money Matters



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Legal Secretary

USA-LA-New Orleans

A New Orleans litigation law firm is seeking an experienced Legal Assistant / Legal Secretary to und...

Apply now

Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney

USA-TX-Fort Worth

We are currently looking for a consumer Bankruptcy Attorney to join our team. This position is respo...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-TN-Knoxville

London & Amburn, PC is located in downtown Knoxville, Tennessee near the Hilton Hotel. London & A...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-NE-Bellevue

Paralegal Big Fire Law & Policy Group LLP is seeking an experienced Paralegal to join our Firm. ...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Civil Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-FL-Tampa

Tampa office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Civil Litigation Associate Attorney ...

Apply Now

Associate Attorney

USA-MI-Livonia

Livonia office of our client seeks Associate Attorney with 2 years of complex civil litigation exper...

Apply Now

Senior Litigation Partner

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks Senior Litigation Partner with 38 years of experience. The ...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top