Breaking News

Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Abortion Law
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 22:  Pro-life activists try to block pro-choice activists as the annual March for Life passes by in front of the U.S. Supreme Court January 22, 2015 in Washington, DC. Pro-life activists gathered in the nation's capital to mark the 1973 Supreme Court  Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion.  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Summary: Today, the Supreme Court ruled a Texas law that could have potentially shuttered numerous abortion clinics was unconstitutional. 

Texas pro-choice advocates rejoiced today when the Supreme Court ruled to throw out a Texas abortion access law that some say would have shuttered almost all of the clinics in the state.


The Supreme Court ruled 5-3 with Justice Stephen Breyer writing the majority opinion. Breyer wrote that Texas’s law did not help cure a significant health-related problem.

“There was no significant health-related problem that the new law helped to cure,” Breyer stated in his majority opinion. “We agree with the District Court that the surgical-center requirement, like the admitting-privileges requirement, provides few, if any, health benefits for women, poses a substantial obstacle to women seeking abortions, and constitutes an “undue burden” on their constitutional right to do so.”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in her opinion that the Texas law harmed women in “desperate circumstances.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“When a State severely limits access to safe and legal procedures, women in desperate circumstances may resort to unlicensed rogue practitioners, faute de mieux, at great risk to their health and safety,” Ginsburg said.

Voting with the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy was considered to be the swing vote on the eight person panel, which still has one position needed to be filled. After the death of  Justice Antonin Scalia, President Barack Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, known to be moderate, but Senate Republicans have refused to act on the nomination.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., Justice Samuel Alito Jr. and Justice Clarence Thomas dissented to today’s decision.

“The Court has simultaneously transformed judicially created rights like the right to abortion into preferred constitutional rights, while disfavoring many of the rights actually enumerated in the Constitution,” Thomas wrote.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joined the dissenting Justices in condemning the ruling.

“The decision erodes States’ lawmaking authority to safeguard the health and safety of women and subjects more innocent life to being lost,” the Republican said.

The Supreme Court examined two components of the controversial law—one that said doctors had to have admitting privileges at local hospitals and that clinics needed to upgrade its facilities to meet hospital-grade standards. Critics said that the law would have shuttered numerous abortion clinics, but others argued that the law was a direct response to the Kermit Gosnell scandal, where a man was convicted of murdering babies that were alive at his clinic.

What do you think of this historical ruling? Let us know in the comments below.

Source: CNN

Photo courtesy of CBS



Corporate Attorney


Full-Time or Part-Time Corporate Attorney We are a boutique corporate and commercial transactiona...

Apply now

Experienced Family Law and Estate Litigation Attorney


Prominent Ridgewood, NJ Elder Law firm seeking a New Jersey Licensed Attorney with at least two year...

Apply now

Full-Time Litigation Associate

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Downtown Los Angeles law firm seeks a full-time litigation associate.  Ideal candidates should ...

Apply now


USA-CA-Newport Beach

The Newport Beach office of Lee Hong Degerman Kang & Waimey is looking for graduates of accredited l...

Apply now




Search Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Maitland office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 2+ years of experience in def...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Charlotte office of our client seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of civil litigation. The cand...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney at Law


Eatontown office of our client seeks litigation attorney at law with experience. The candidate shoul...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top