Legal News

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Supreme Court Ruling Affects Local Sign Codes
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Reed political signs

Summary: Many local governments and lawyers are discovering that the sign codes are borderline unconstitutional and need to be revised after the ruling on Reed.

Government regulations on signs have long been a source of problems with the lawyers that litigate over them saying that some sign ordinances are a little unconstitutional when it comes to issues of freedom of speech.

  
What
Where


On June 18th, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. Town of Gilbert made it clear that there was a “strict scrutiny” First Amendment standard where governments cannot treat some signs better or worse than others.

Gilbert, Arizona had a sign ordinance that was gave freedom to some signs but severely restricted others such as a directional signs that at local church was using temporarily to direct attendees. Gilbert claimed that the denied the signs because they wanted to reduce clutter and support traffic safety.

This ruling has urged lawyers to review the sign codes for local governments. It is expected that the Reed ruling will affect signage for the political campaigns during the presidential election next year. The ruling could also be used in other First Amendment litigations that are not solely related to signage problems.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Robert Frommer, a lawyer for the Institute for Justice stated, “Reed is a game-changing opinion that will increase speech protections for a wide class of speakers. Thousands of sign codes are now constitutionally suspect.” The Institute plans on working with local governments to help them bring their sign codes up to date.

A common code problem is for the size and duration of signs that restrict political campaign signs but not real estate signs. Many codes also limit the display of national flags but not sports teams or club banners.



Source: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/supremecourtbrief/home/id=1202733437381

Photo: adfmedia.org



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Eminent Domain Attorney

USA-TX-Richmond

Richmond office of our client seeks eminent domain attorney with 5+ years of experience. The candida...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Hotline & Training Managing Attorney (IMMIGRATION)

USA-NY-New York City

The Hotline & Training Services Managing Attorney will guide, develop, and supervise the Hotline sta...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 3 to 5 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top