Baker Botts and Asarco Fight Moves to Supreme Court
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Two legal scholars analyze what they think are the worst Supreme Court decisions in history.

Summary: The legal battle between mining company Asarco and law firm Baker Botts has reached the Supreme Court.  

The Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments in a lawsuit between Baker Botts and Asarco, according to The Washington Post.


Baker Botts represented Asarco, a mining company, in bankruptcy proceedings. The issue at the heart of the lawsuit is whether or not Baker Botts can collect $5.2 million in legal fees the attorneys accrued trying to convince lower courts they deserved to be paid an original $117 million in fees earned representing Asarco in their bankruptcy filing.

The bottom line here is that Baker Botts argues that it should be paid fees incurred as it defended the right to collect fees originally earned.

To read more law firm news stories, click here.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The oral argument in front of the Supreme Court brings an end to seven years of legal fighting between Asarco and Baker Botts.

Asarco is owned by Grupo Mexico and it filed for Chapter 11 protection back in 2005. It exited bankruptcy back in 2009.

Baker Botts asked for $113 million to be approved by the presiding judge, with an additional $22 million in “fee enhancements.”

In 2011, the bankruptcy judge approved $117 million in fees for Baker Botts, which was $113 million and just $4 million in fee enhancements.

Asarco did not agree with the fees and a separate trial ensued. When defending its fee request, Baker Botts spent $5.2 million in attorney fees.

The issue, once appealed by Asarco, went to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Baker received a ruling in their favor in 2012, saying the firm should collect the $5.2 million defending its fee request.

To read more about Baker Botts, click here.

Asarco appealed once again, moving the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The appeals court reversed the ruling in April of 2014. Baker appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.

Aaron Streett, the Baker Botts attorney representing the firm in front of the Supreme Court, said, “It ensures that a company can’t attack the attorneys’ fee applications and water down the fees [attorneys] earned by forcing attorneys to bear the cost of defending it.”

How will the Supreme Court rule? Cast your vote below.

How will the Supreme Court rule?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Source: Washington Post


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney


Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now


Litigation Associate

USA-CA-San Francisco

Requirements Candidates should have two to five years of litigation and arbitration experience.&#...

Apply now



Growing law firm in need of a real estate paralegal. Ideal candidate will be organized, responsible,...

Apply now

Creditor's Rights / Collection Attorney


Bannockburn, IL-based Regional Debt Collection Law Firm seeks consumer collection attorney with 1-4 ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney - Immigration


Entry-level associate with some experience in immigration law. Duties will include court appearances...

Apply now


To Top