Legal News

Lawsuit to Continue Between MGA and Mattel
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

bratz, mattel, mga entertainment

Summary: The lawsuit fight between MGA Entertainment and Mattel over the Bratz dolls will continue to court after a judge denied a motion to dismiss it. 

Mattel’s motion to dismiss a $1 billion trade-secret lawsuit filed by MGA Entertainment has been denied by a Los Angeles Superior Court Judge, according to the Sherman Oaks Patch.


The lawsuit claims that Mattel spied on MGA Entertainment at toy shows.

The battle comes from the federal court fight with Mattel over which company owns the line of popular dolls called Bratz.

To read more about Bratz dolls, click here.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“We are grateful for this correct decision,” said Isaac Larian, Chief Executive Officer of MGA Entertainment. “Large, publicly traded companies are not above the law. Mattel, for years, has blatantly stolen trade secrets from MGA Entertainment and other toy companies. MGAE looks forward to justice finally being served, and to having a second jury find against Mattel on these issues. Today’s ruling is the first step in the courts sending a strong message to Mattel and other big companies that it is not OK to steal competitors’ IP and compete unfairly.”

The lawsuit was filed with the Los Angeles Superior Court in January, just one month after U.S. District Judge David O. Carter turned down a request for a new trial by MGA. The company wanted a new trial on its trade-secrets fight with Mattel.

To read more stories about Mattel, click here.

Mattel was issued a verdict against it in April of 2011 by jurors. The jurors based their decision on evidence presented at trial that showed the company took part in corporate espionage. The attorneys for MGA also argued that Mattel bullied stores into keeping Bratz dolls off of their shelves.

MGA was awarded $85 million and then Carter ruled that Mattel should pay an added $85 million in punitive damages. The first award was for compensatory damages.

The jury’s verdict was overturned by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals because Carter improperly ruled that MGA’s counterclaim was “compulsory” to the original complaint filed by Mattel. The reason for this is that the jury back in 2011 should not have been thinking about claims made by both companies at the same time.

To read more about MGA Entertainment, click here.

Carter’s order that Mattel pay attorneys’ and other fees of $137.8 million was upheld by the appellate court.

Will MGA Entertainment ever win this lawsuit? Use our poll to share your thoughts.

Who will win this lawsuit?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...



Associate Attorney


Job description Immigration Associate Attorney About Us: Leading Houston immigration law firm s...

Apply now


USA-KS-Overland Park

Overland Park law firm is looking for an experienced litigation paralegal. Candidates must be mature...

Apply now

Criminal Defense Attorney


SKILLED AND COMPASSIONATE DEFENSE ATTORNEY NEEDED We will keep it simple. We need a skilled defen...

Apply now

Office Assistant / Paralegal

USA-NY-New York City

About the job A boutique NYC downtown law firm is looking for a full-time Mandarin Chinese speaki...

Apply now




Search Now

International Trust and Estates Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an international trust and e...

Apply Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a Real Estate Attorney with ...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now


To Top