Legal News

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Case Against Contraceptive Provision of Affordable Care Act
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The Supreme Court Justices had trouble with the question of a private company skirting around a federal law simply by citing religious beliefs of the company shareholders, according to the Huffington Post.

A provision of the Affordable Care Act is being challenged by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp.

  
What
Where


Hobby Lobby Stores is a Christian-owned crafts supply chain. Conestoga Wood Specialties is owned by Mennonite Christians. Both companies are challenging the provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires all non-profit businesses to include contraceptives approved by the FDA in health insurance plans.

The attorneys for Hobby Lobby argue that the law violates their constitutional right to religious freedom when forced to cover all birth control or they will be fined. The owners of the company are against emergency contraception and intrauterine devices, believing that they are forms of abortion.

The mandate in the law has exceptions in place for religious schools, hospitals and churches. For-profit businesses are required to carry all forms of preventive care. This includes intrauterine devices, birth control and emergency contraception. They must be provided to employees at no cost.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The attorney for Hobby Lobby is former Solicitor General Paul D. Clement. The female justices asked the most questions during oral arguments on Tuesday.

“There are quite a number of medical treatments that could be religiously objected to,” Justice Elena Kagan stated. “Everything would be piecemeal, nothing would be uniform.”



Kagan went on to suggest that companies would be able to challenge other federal laws. She mentioned family leave requirements, minimum wage and child labor laws as examples because of their religious beliefs.

Justice Anthony Kennedy is expected to be the swing vote in the case. He questioned both sides immensely on Tuesday.

“How would we consider the rights of employees?” Kennedy asked. “The employees may not believe … in the religious beliefs of the employer.”

The attorney for the Obama Administration, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr., said the state and federal laws “don’t consider these particular forms of contraception to be abortion.”

In a brief, Verrilli argued, “Allowing a corporation, through either shareholder vote or board resolution, to take on and assert the religious beliefs of its shareholders in order to avoid having to comply with a generally-applicable law with a secular purpose is fundamentally at odds with the entire concept of incorporation.”



 

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Junior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-Westlake Village

Los Angeles office is seeking a junior land use associate with 1-6 years of experience. Candidate mu...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

AV-rated, Chicago Loop defense firm of trial lawyers seeks associate attorneys to join our busy liti...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney (5+ years)

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

The Fort Lauderdale office of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck seeks an experienced litigation associate wi...

Apply now

Director of Originations, Litigation Finance Investments

USA-TX-Dallas

Location is flexible nationwide -- NOT only Dallas. Job Summary Rapidly growing litigatio...

Apply now

Market Research Consulting Analyst for Litigation Projects

USA-MA-Waltham

Applied Marketing Science, Inc. (AMS) is a market research and consulting firm located in Waltham, M...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top