Legal News

New Report Released Detailing Illegal Actions of NSA Program
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

A report from a watchdog group has concluded that the National Security Agency’s program that collected phone call records is illegal, aided slightly in counterterrorism efforts and should be stopped, according to The New York Times.

The report is supposed to be released today and is 238 pages in length. It was conducted by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which was made independent by Congress in 2007.


President Obama’s administration has claimed that the phone call collection program has been useful and lawful. At the same time, the administration has said that the program does cause potential abuse.

The New York Times gained access to the report prior to its release. The report states that the program “lacks a viable legal foundation under Section 215, implicates constitutional concerns under the First and Fourth Amendments, raises serious threats to privacy and civil liberties as a policy matter, and has shown only limited value. As a result, the board recommends that the government end the program.”

The board consists of five members, with two of them dissenting from the idea that the program is actually illegal. The panel did come to unanimous decisions regarding 10 other recommendations made by the report. These recommendations include deleting phone records that are raw after three years, which would be down from five years, and securing access to searches.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The board said that the program violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act as well.

“It may have been a laudable goal for the executive branch to bring this program under the supervision” of the court, according to the report. “Ultimately, however, that effort represents an unsustainable attempt to shoehorn a pre-existing surveillance program into the text of a statute with which it is not compatible.”

The program is also criticized for multiple uses of the program to collect data. The panel found “no instance in which the program directly contributed to the discovery of a previously unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist attack.”



Associate Attorney


I am looking for an Associate Attorney to work in my general practice law firm. The practice...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Seeking a qualified Transactional Attorney with experience in litigation, covenant enforcement and c...

Apply now

Consumer Defense Litigation Attorney


SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL seeks an experienced attorney to join its commercial litigation /...

Apply now

Bankruptcy and Restructuring Partner / Associate


Buckley King is seeking both a partner and a mid-level associate to represent both creditors and deb...

Apply now




Search Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Pittsburgh office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks associate attorney with 3+ year...

Apply Now

Junior Antitrust Associate Attorney


Washington, D.C. office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks junior antitrust associat...

Apply Now

Civil Litigation (Insurance Defense) Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of our client seeks civil litigation (insurance defense) associate attorney with ex...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top