Legal News

Sacramento Appeals Court Rules No Constitutional Right to Grow Marijuana
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

While upholding Live Oak’s citywide ban on medical marijuana cultivation, the 3rd District Court of Appeals in Sacramento observed there is no “unfettered right to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes,” even though medical marijuana might be legal in the state.

The appeals court also observed that legalization of medical marijuana in the state does not “pre-empt a city’s police power to prohibit the cultivation of all marijuana within the city.”

  
What
Where


Live Oak’s City Council approved an ordinance for citywide ban on cultivation of medical marijuana in 2011, but James Maral, in his individual capacity and as trustee of the Live Oak Patients, Caregivers and Supporters Association sued to block the ordinance.

Maral and others argued that existent state law pre-empted the city ordinance.

In the initial round, Sutter County Superior Court Judge Perry Parker ruled in favor of the city. The matter moved in appeal and this week the 3rd District Court of Appeals upheld Parker’s judgment.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The appeals court also said that there was no conflict between the act of a local government in controlling marijuana cultivation and the Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act approved in 1996, or the 2003 Medical Marijuana Program.

Neither statute, the court observed, “expressly or impliedly pre-empted a zoning provision that prohibited a medical marijuana dispensary anywhere within the city limits.”



While the court admitted that until now no other municipality has banned the cultivation of medical marijuana, “the choices other cities may have made with respect to medical marijuana are irrelevant to our analysis of pre-emption in this particular case.”

In clarifying the court’s interpretation on the legal right to cultivate medical marijuana, the appeals court observed, “there is no right – and certainly no constitutional right – to cultivate medical marijuana.”



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Law Clerk

USA-DC-Washington

C2 ALASKA, LLC Washington, DC   The Law Clerk II Journeyman- Division of Enforcem...

Apply now

Director of Administration

USA-VA-Arlington

Director of Administration (Communications/Litigation/Transactional Law Firm) Fletcher, Heald...

Apply now

Legal Executive Assistant

USA-VA-Arlington

Legal Executive Assistant (Communications/Copyright/Litigation)   Fletcher, Heald & Hi...

Apply now

Department Chairperson, Law Center

USA-FL-Miami

Miami Dade College, Wolfson Campus is now accepting applications for the Department Chairperson...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Attorney

USA-FL-Jacksonville

Jacksonville office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an attorney with 4-20 years o...

Apply Now

General Liability Associate Attorney

USA-GA-Atlanta

Atlanta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks general liability associate attorn...

Apply Now

Wealth Planning Senior Associate/Of Counsel

USA-NV-Reno

Reno office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks wealth planning senior associate/of c...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top