Legal News

Judge has Mixed Feelings about SAC Settlement in $602 Million Insider Trading Settlement
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Judge Victor Marrero is not at all happy about the sorts of deals the S.E.C. has been working out with such folks as the hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors, and is trusting his gut and awaiting some guidance on how to handle the types of deals the S.E.C. is approving. SAC Capital Advisors are charged in two civil matters, a $602 million case and a $14 million one, and many of their former employees have been charged regarding insider trading. The sorts of agreements the SAC are seeking are that they “neither admit nor deny guilt” but instead pay a $602 million fine, the sort of thing that Marrero’s fellow judge, Jed. S. Rakoff calls “chump change.”

Indeed, Marrero is waiting for Rakoff’s ruling; Rakoff is rejecting a $285 million settlement against Citigroup in a fraud cause initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Marrero is unhappy about the deals the S.E.C. has been striking, especially regarding the “neither admit nor deny” that give too much leeway to places like SAC. It seems such legislation could act like a “get out of jail free card” letting them commit crimes or engage in spurious activity, but never have to admit it.


“Perhaps we live in a different era,” Judge Marrero wrote, as Dealbook reported. “In this age when the notion labeled ‘too big to fail’ (or jail, as the case may be) has gained currency throughout commercial markets, some cynics read the concept as code words meant as encouragement by an accommodating public — a free pass to evade or ignore the rules, a wink and a nod as cover for grand fraud, a license to deceive unsuspecting customers.”

“Perhaps, too, in these modern times,” he also said, “new financial, industrial and legal patterns have merged that call for enhanced regulatory and, as appropriate, judicial oversight to counter these sinister attitudes.”

His mixed feelings and uncertainty can be read through his statements on the case, such as when he said:

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

“The court must avoid undue meddling and second-guessing, and must accord government agency law enforcement and financial determinations such as those now before it the proper level of deference they are due. At the same time, the court cannot conceive that Congress intended the judiciary’s function in passing upon these settlements as illusory, as a predetermined rubber stamp for any settlement put before it.”

His concern shows a conviction that the SAC Capitol Advisors and others are using such “neither admit nor deny” language in cases to avoid real guilt and responsibility.



Attorney-Litigation-Workers' Compensation-Remote

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Attorney-Los Angeles (remote other than Court appearances or necessary depoistions): EPS, a growi...

Apply now

Trial Attorney

USA-CA-Long Beach


Apply now

Senior Law Clerk

USA-CA-Los Angeles

C2 ALAKSA Los Angeles, CA   The Law Clerk III shall provide legal research a...

Apply now



Salary $40,000 - $50,000 a year Job Type Full-time Number of hires for this role 1 ...

Apply now




Search Now

Liability Defense Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Ft. Lauderdale office of our client seeks liability defense attorney with 3+ years of insurance defe...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Associate Attorney


Murrieta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks senior family law associate attor...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top