Legal News

Letter to Rand Paul from Eric Holder Regarding Drone Strikes in U.S. Disclosed
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

United States Attorney General Eric Holder said in a letter that was disclosed on Tuesday that the Obama Administration believes it is allowed to kill an American on U.S. soil in an “extraordinary circumstance” but has “no intention of doing so.”

The letter was sent to Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who asked if the Justice Department believed Obama has legal authority to order targeted strikes against an American citizen in the United States.

  
What
Where


“The US Attorney General’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening,” Paul said. “It is an affront the constitutional due process rights of all Americans.”

Holder wrote the following, according to Mother Jones:

“As members of this administration have previously indicated, the US government has not carried out drone strikes in the United States and has no intention of doing so. As a policy matter moreover, we reject the use of military force where well-established law enforcement authorities in this country provide the best means for incapacitating a terrorist threat. We have a long history of using the criminal justice system to incapacitate individuals located in our country who pose a threat to the United States and its interests abroad. Hundreds of individuals have been arrested and convicted of terrorism-related offenses in our federal courts.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




“The question you have posed is therefore entirely hypothetical, unlikely to occur, and one we hope no president will ever have to confront. It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States.”

“For example, the president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military to use such force if necessary to protect the homeland in the circumstances like a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered on December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001,” Holder continued.



The letter concluded with the following: “Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the president of the scope of his authority.”



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Trust and Estate Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Hagen O’Connell & Hval LLP is seeking to hire an experienced Estate / Trust litigation attorne...

Apply now

Trust and Estate Litigation Attorney

USA-WA-Seattle

Hagen O’Connell & Hval LLP is seeking to hire an experienced Estate / Trust litigation attorne...

Apply now

Personal Injury Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Job details Salary $60,000 - $80,000 a year Job Type Full-time Number of hires for th...

Apply now

Legal Assistant Paralegal

USA-IL-Evanston

We are seeking a legal assistant or paralegal that is interested in finding a longstanding, professi...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Liability Defense Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Ft. Lauderdale office of our client seeks liability defense attorney with 3+ years of insurance defe...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Murrieta

Murrieta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks senior family law associate attor...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top