Legal News

Arizona Immigration Law Targeting Day Laborers Blocked by Appeals Court
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, in a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found a controversial portion of the Arizona immigration law that targeted day laborers to be unconstitutional, and upheld a February 2012 decision of a district judge to block the law.

While the U.S. Supreme Court has already struck down most of the Arizona immigration law launched in 2010 by Governor Jan Brewer last year, parts of the law continued to exist and confuse people. The matter in the Supreme Court had primarily been fought over the jurisdiction of federal government to control immigration, and to what extent an individual state may impose its own rules.

The section concerned in the instant case made it a crime if a motorist stopped to hire a day laborer and traffic was blocked. The section also prohibited any day laborer from entering a car that is obstructing traffic.

  
What
Where


The Ninth Circuit held the law exceeded the scope of state authority in restricting commercial free speech rights.

Attorneys for the state argued that the state’s sole intention was to promote traffic safety, but the Ninth Circuit did not buy the argument and observed the law was “motivated by a desire to eliminate the livelihoods of undocumented immigrants.” The opinion added, “Laws that limit commercial speech must not be more extensive than necessary to serve a substantial government interest.”

Governor Jan Brewer’s spokesman, Matthew Benson, said the governor is discussing the possibility of appeal and that “this is an important tool to give law enforcement.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Pablo Alvarado, director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, and whose group was co-counsel in the matter, told the media, “It is fundamentally wrong to criminalize work, to criminalize people who are looking for work to feed their loved ones.”





 

RELEVANT JOBS

REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATE

USA-WA-Tacoma

Role Overview Gordon Thomas Honeywell seeks a real estate transactional attorney with three to fi...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal

USA-CT-New London

Job details No matching job preferences Salary $20 - $23 an hour Job Type Full-t...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CT-Greenwich

Job Summary: Smith Legacy Law seeks an Associate who will work alongside the legal team in advisi...

Apply now

Air Enforcement Coordinator & Adjudication Officer

USA-VA-Richmond

The Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Environmental Enhancement seeks a highly qualif...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Associate Attorney with 3+ years of litigation experience

USA-GA-Atlanta

Atlanta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney with 3+ year...

Apply Now

Family Law Associate Attorney

USA-TN-Knoxville

Knoxville office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a family law associate attorney ...

Apply Now

Associate Attorney

USA-WI-Wisconsin Rapids

Wisconsin Rapids office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney wit...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top