Legal News

Supreme Courts Declines to Review ‘Personhood’ Ballot Measure
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the application by anti-abortion group Personhood Oklahoma to review the decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which struck down the ballot initiative termed as “personhood amendment.” The group wanted the measure to be put to vote in Oklahoma to define an embryo as a human being from the moment it was conceived, at the stage of a fertilized egg.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court had struck down the initiative holding that the proposed amendment to the state’s constitution was “clearly unconstitutional” as the issue had already been decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

While the Center for Reproductive Rights, the ACLU and local abortion rights groups had sued in March to block the proposed initiative, and got a ruling in their favor, Personhood Oklahoma challenged the state court’s decision and appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The appellants had argued that the decision of Oklahoma Supreme Court to block the initiative from being put to ballot deprived supporters of the measure of their rights to free speech and of their rights to participate in the democratic process.

  
What
Where


However, the U.S. Supreme Court, refused to hear the case without adding any comment.

Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights said in a statement welcoming the rejection order, “Pure and simple, these tactics are an affront to our nation’s Constitution and a bald-faced attempt to foreclose women’s access to a full range of reproductive healthcare.”

However, similar initiatives have been placed on ballot in Colorado and Mississippi, though in both states, such amendment measures have been defeated.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is Personhood Oklahoma v. Barber et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-145.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney/Litigation - Reno, NV

USA-NV-Reno

The Reno, NV office of Blanchard, Krasner & French seeks associate attorney with a minimum of 5+ yea...

Apply now

Attorney / Transactional - Reno, NV

USA-NV-Reno

The Reno, NV office of Blanchard, Krasner & French seeks associate attorney with a minimum of 5+ yea...

Apply now

Business Manager for Top Law Schools- Remote Position

USA-UT-Ephraim

We are looking for a dynamic, committed, hard-working recent law school graduate who wants to gain b...

Apply now

Business Manager for Top Law Schools - Remote Position

USA-NV-Las Vegas

We are looking for a dynamic, committed, hard-working recent law graduate who wants to gain broad-ba...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Corporate/Transactional Attorney

USA-IA-Des Moines

Des Moines office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate/transactional attorne...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney / Counsel

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate attorney with 5+ y...

Apply Now

Housing Finance Associate Attorney

USA-MN-Minneapolis

Minneapolis office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a housing finance associate at...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top