Breaking News

Lawyers for R. Allen Stanford Request Withdrawal from Case
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The attorneys for R. Allen Stanford, Ali Fazel and Robert Scardino, from Scardino & Fazel LLP, were issued payment from public money because all of Stanford’s assets were frozen. The attorneys submitted their request to be removed to United States District Judge David Hittner 12 days prior to the scheduled start of the trial. They said that budget constraints and a denial from the court of a motion to consider postponing the start date of the trial caused them to improperly represent Stanford.

R. Allen Stanford, who is scheduled to stand trial beginning on January 23 for reportedly creating a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, has seen his lawyers request that a federal judge from Texas allow them to remove themselves from working the case. The lawyers claim that some restrictions imposed by the court are keeping the lawyers from effectively performing their job.

  
What
Where


“Simply stated, the rulings of this court, the budget matters made public by this court and matters still under seal have placed counsel in an untenable position,” the request said.

The two lawyers said that they withdrew because of ethical obligations to provide their client with the best legal counsel possible, which they were not doing because of the limitations, which made them violate Stanford’s due process rights.

Budget restraints were placed on the defense team, which is being publicly funded, by Judge Hittner, which has prevented them from using experts that they claim are very important to the case. The withdrawal request claims that the court permitted the defense team to bring on a consultant for the jury back in May. Then, not long after the defense team used its money when working with the consultant, the approval from the court was pulled, claiming that the approval was a mistake.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




If the attorneys were not permitted to withdraw from the case, they asked that there be a delay in the trial for at least 90 days.

Time problems were also cited by the defense team in the withdrawal request because Stanford suffered an injury to his brain while in prison, which took time away from trial preparation.



On January 3, companies providing the defense with expert services and document management quit the case because they claim they had yet to be paid. Those vendors began working with the defense team again after their payment was approved by the court. The defense team claims that things were delayed because of all the confusing issues and the late payment.

Stanford is the ex-chairman of the Stanford Financial Group Co. He has been charged with 14 counts of wire fraud, mail fraud, obstruction and conspiracy charges. He allegedly misappropriated billions of money in funds from investors. This includes $1.6 billion he reportedly put into his personal accounts. Stanford issued a plea of not guilty back in June of 2009.

During this time, the defense team was trying to finish the process of discovery while they were also planning for a competency hearing as a result of the Stanford brain injury. The attorneys also said that there was little help from their client because they claimed incompetence and was spending nine months in a medical center. On December 22 Stanford was ruled that he could stand trial because he was competent.

Information researched from Texas Lawyer; an ALM Publication and News Daily.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Mid-level Construction Associate Attorney

USA-DC-Washington

Washington, D.C. office of our client seeks mid-level construction associate attorney with 3-4 years...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation (General and/or Family Law) Attorney

USA-IL-Salem

Hunter Law Firm, P.C., presently a 3-attorney general practice firm located in Salem, Mari...

Apply now

Senior Associate- New York, NY

USA-NY-New York City

Small, collegial firm, with focus on ERISA and union side labor law, has opportunity with growth pot...

Apply now

Vice President and General Counsel

USA-NY-Long Island City

VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL CLASS CODE: SC103 SALARY RANGE: $119,387.00 - $220,397.00 ...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-MA-Springfield

Commercial real estate paralegal. Prepare documents for commercial real estate transactions.  G...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top