The motion also mentions that Otillar and other partners were “fraudulently induced” into signing a Citibank loan program that financed the capital contributions of partners joining Dewey. So far, Otillar seems to be the only former partner of Dewey who has been sued by Citibank for defaulting on loans.
Ottilar argues that Citibank had a fiduciary duty to warn him about the actual financial situation of Dewey & LeBoeuf, which the bank was fully aware of. He said that the loan program for financing partner contributions at Dewey was designed by Citibank and the Dewey management to shift a pre-existing debt owed by Dewey to individual partners. According to Otillar’s claims, Citibank was fully aware of the precarious finances of the law firm when it structured the arrangement, and the bank should have notified him and other incoming partners of the huge risks involved in the arrangement.
Otillar claims that by not apprising him of the financial situation of Dewey while financing him for making his partner contribution, Citibank knowingly misled “me, my wife and countless other unsuspecting lateral hires and their spouses.”
While it is extremely rare for a bank to sue a former partner of a collapsed law firm individually over a capital loan – the money partners borrow to finance their investments in a law firm – it is not known why Citi singled out Otillar.
In his motion, Otillar argued that the fact the bank issued letters of credit to some of Dewey’s management team to secure management’s compensation in the event of the firm’s collapse, shows that the bank was fully aware of the troubles of Dewey at the time when it “induced” Otillar to sign for a capital loan.
Commenting on the issue, Otillar’s lawyer, Helen Davis said, “If Citibank knew that Dewey was going under and solicited Otillar’s loan in order to pay down the Dewey exposure, Citibank could be liable for aiding and abetting a fraud.”
