Legal News

President Trump Dramatically Shrinks Two Monuments in Utah
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Bears Ears

Summary: President Donald Trump announced his changes to the sizes of two national monuments in Utah during his visit over the weekend.

The Trump Administration began its review of national land months ago with everyone anticipating and predicting which national monuments would get the cut. First on the docket were two large monuments in the state of Utah – Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante.


Environmental and Native American groups are not happy about President Donald Trump’s decision to get rid of a large portion of land from each monument. They do not feel that the president has the power to do so even though the Antiquities Act of 1906 allows a president to create national monuments without the support of Congress. The lawsuits filed against the Trump administration on Monday argue that Congress must authorize any changes to federal land. A federal lands law from the 70s indicates that Congress has the power to reduce or nullify a national monument. Attorney general for the Navajo Nation, Ethel Branch, said, “There is nothing in the Antiquities Act that authorizes a president to modify a national monument once it’s been designated.” However, previous presidents have made small changes to monument boundaries without issue.

The administration and leaders in Utah in support of the changes say that the state will now have control over the land and what happens to it instead of the government. Some land will likely be protected while others may be allowed to be developed on.

Patagonia, an outdoor clothing and gear retailer, plastered a statement on its website read: “The President Stole Your Land. In an illegal move, the president just reduced the size of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase Escalante National Monuments. This is the largest elimination of protected land in American history.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The argument over the Antiquities Act, signed into federal law by Teddy Roosevelt, was supposed to stop the pilfering of ancient Indian artifacts from public land. However, the law states that the sites should be protected using the smallest amount of land possible. As Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said, “The Antiquities Act was never intended to prevent, it was intended to protect.”

Bears Ears was 1.3 million acres in size, something that a lot of locals had an issue with. San Juan County Commission Chair Bruce Adams said Trump “listened to the local people, even though they weren’t millions of voters, only 15,000 people in our community. He understands what rural communities are about.” The change in classification of the land will allow for others things to be done with the land, such as cattle grazing or mining.

Utah is roughly two-thirds of federally owned land with seven large monuments. The administration is reviewing 25 other large monuments, some of which are in Oregon and Nevada. The reason for the review is a suffering National Park Service department. The service is currently facing a $12 billion maintenance backlog, meaning that there are buildings, roads, and bridges crumbling throughout the protected lands that cannot be repaired or replaced because of a lack of money.

When former President Obama designated the Bears Ears National Monument, already federal land, he placed the responsibility of maintaining on the Park Service when other agencies such as the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, were successfully managing the land. The land could now be open to more uses like hunting, fishing, camping, and outdoor recreation.

Do you think some of the national monuments are too large in size or should they be larger to further protect the lands? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.

To learn more about issues over the designation of land, read these articles:



Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Attorney with 8 years of civil litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Westside law firm of our client is seeking an attorney with 8 years of civil litigation experience, ...

Apply Now

Senior Attorney with litigation experience

USA-NY-New York City

New York City non profit is seeking a senior litigation counsel to manage litigation strategy as wel...

Apply Now

IP Technical Advisor with 1-3 years of software experience


Alexandria office of our client seeks IP technical advisor with 1-3 years of experience in IP applic...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 3-5 years of employment discrimination experience


Melville office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience. The candidate ...

Apply Now


Public Law Associate Attorney (General Municipal Law, Real Estate, Transactions)

USA-CA-San Rafael

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP is seeking a skilled and motivated associate attorney with 1 to 3 ye...

Apply now

Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT


Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington


Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top