A coalition of solar energy companies, unions, and nonprofit organizations has filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging its recent decision to cancel a $7 billion grant program that was originally created to promote renewable energy in underserved communities. The lawsuit represents the latest legal battle over clean energy policy and federal climate initiatives following the administration’s reversal of several Biden-era environmental programs.
Filed in federal court in Rhode Island, the suit targets the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its current administrator, Lee Zeldin, who announced in August that the agency would rescind the Solar for All grant program. The program, funded through President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, was designed to help low-income households transition to renewable power sources by funding solar projects in states, territories, tribal lands, and non-profit organizations across the country.
According to court filings, the plaintiffs — a broad group of solar advocacy organizations, local installers, unions, and individuals — claim the EPA acted unlawfully and without proper authority when it canceled the program. They argue that the decision not only violated administrative law but also jeopardized years of work toward expanding equitable access to clean energy.
The lawsuit contends that the agency’s abrupt reversal has caused “irreparable harm” to communities that were expecting to benefit from renewable energy investments and job creation. Plaintiffs assert that the administration’s action undermines both environmental progress and economic opportunities for working families.
Who’s Behind the Lawsuit
While none of the plaintiffs were direct recipients of the grants, they argue they had a vested interest in the program’s continuation. The coalition includes:
- Rhode Island AFL-CIO, representing workers who stood to gain from solar construction jobs.
- Rhode Island Center for Justice, which advocates for low-income residents’ access to environmental benefits.
- Solar United Neighbors, a national nonprofit helping communities adopt solar energy.
- Energy Independent Solutions, a Pittsburgh-based solar installation company.
- Black Sun Light Sustainability, a clean energy organization based in Indiana.
- Sunpath Solar and 2KB Energy Services, both located in Georgia.
- Anh Nguyen, an Atlanta homeowner who had applied for solar installation assistance through Georgia’s Solar for All program.
The plaintiffs’ attorneys argue that the decision to cancel the grants was politically motivated and rushed, with no clear legal justification. They are seeking to have the grants reinstated and for the court to rule that the EPA’s action violated federal law.
Background on the $7 Billion Program
The Solar for All program was a cornerstone of the Biden administration’s environmental justice agenda, established under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund — a $27 billion initiative designed to accelerate clean energy investments nationwide. The $7 billion segment of the fund was specifically allocated to expand solar energy access for lower-income households, reduce electricity bills, and support clean energy jobs.
In April 2024, the EPA announced grant recipients that included 60 organizations — ranging from state governments to tribal authorities and nonprofit coalitions. These grants were expected to fund community solar projects, improve grid resilience, and stimulate local economic growth.
However, following the 2025 change in administration, many of the Biden-era climate programs came under review. By August, Zeldin announced that the EPA lacked the legal authority to continue the Solar for All initiative, effectively halting disbursements.
The administration defended its decision by arguing that the program’s funding structure and allocation process were inconsistent with existing statutory limits on agency spending. Critics, however, view the move as part of a broader rollback of climate-focused programs, signaling a shift back toward fossil-fuel-friendly policies.
Legal and Political Implications
Legal experts say the case could test the limits of executive power and administrative discretion when it comes to modifying or canceling previously approved federal programs. The plaintiffs allege that the EPA violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by failing to provide sufficient notice, opportunity for public comment, or a reasoned explanation for the cancellation.
If successful, the lawsuit could reinstate funding for dozens of halted projects and set an important precedent for how future administrations handle the reversal of environmental grants. Conversely, if the court sides with the EPA, it could reinforce the executive branch’s authority to swiftly roll back climate-related initiatives without congressional approval.
The lawsuit also underscores the growing tension between federal climate objectives and shifting political priorities. Renewable energy advocates argue that abruptly canceling programs like Solar for All sends a damaging signal to clean energy investors, nonprofits, and local governments who rely on policy consistency to plan long-term projects.
The EPA has declined to comment on the ongoing litigation, citing its policy of not discussing active cases.
Broader Impact on the Clean Energy Sector
Industry observers warn that the program’s cancellation could have ripple effects across the renewable energy landscape. The $7 billion in grants represented a significant portion of federal clean energy investment, and its loss could slow momentum in communities that were poised to adopt solar power for the first time.
Beyond environmental consequences, the rollback could also affect employment in the clean energy sector, which has been one of the fastest-growing job markets in the U.S. “This isn’t just about solar panels — it’s about jobs, energy affordability, and economic fairness,” said one industry advocate.
As the legal battle unfolds, stakeholders across the renewable energy sector are watching closely. The case could determine not only the future of Solar for All but also the broader direction of U.S. clean energy policy under the current administration.
Stay ahead of the latest developments in environmental and energy law by exploring legal career opportunities on LawCrossing — the nation’s largest legal job board. Whether you’re passionate about renewable energy policy or environmental litigation, LawCrossing connects you with firms and organizations shaping the future of sustainability and law.
