Legal News

Court Applies Dodd-Frank ‘Retroactively’ to Protect Whistleblowers
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In addressing what he termed as a ‘novel question’ U.S. District Judge J. Paul Oetkent in Manhattan held on Monday that the Dodd-Frank reforms of Sarbanes-Oxley Act should apply retroactively to cases predating Dodd-Frank. The judge held that such retroactive application was “a clarification of Congress’s intent” concerning whistleblowers. The Dodd-Frank amendments of 2010 included a series of reforms to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act meant to protect employees of subsidiaries of big companies from reprisals by their employers.

The instant case involved that of one Phillip Leshinsky who had previously worked for the non-public Caseta unit of Telvent GIT, a Spanish technology company. Leshinsky had sued over his July 2008 termination which he holds to be wrongful. At the time Telvent employed about 6,100 people and had over 30 units. Last year, the company was bought by a French company Schneider Electric SA.

Leshinsky claims that his job was terminated in retaliation to his objections to the use of fraudulent information in connection with Caseta’s bid for a Metropolitan Transportation Authority contract in the New York City. Telvent has denied the fact that Leshinsky was fired for being a whistleblower and refuted the existence of the alleged scheme to defraud the MTA according to court papers.

  
What
Where


However, the court found that in allowing the Dodd-Frank reforms, the Congress had stated that its intentions included the protection of whistleblowers who tried to thwart financial fraud within “large, complexly structured” companies. The judge mentioned in his decision, “In light of the fact that corporate malfeasance can — and often does — occur within subsidiaries of a public company, and that such malfeasance was precisely what precipitated the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, it is certainly reasonable to infer that, in enacting whistleblower protections, Congress intended to protect the employees of a corporation’s subsidiaries in addition to employees of the parent itself.”



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Mid-Level to Senior Litigation Associate - New York, NY

USA-NY-New York City

Job Title:  Mid-Level to Senior Litigation Associate Role:  Associate in Employment Lit...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CO-Littleton

An established and longstanding Littleton law firm is seeking an associate attorney to join our...

Apply now

Manager, Education Civil Rights Alliance

USA-CA-Oakland

National Center for Youth Law  The National Center for Youth Law (NCYL) works to amplify you...

Apply now

Senior Director, Education

USA-CA-Oakland

Education Team  NCYL\'s Education team engages in education justice work in partnership with...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Commercial Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MA-Boston

Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a commercial litigation associate a...

Apply Now

Foreclosure Attorney

USA-GA-Atlanta

Atlanta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks foreclosure attorney with experien...

Apply Now

Foreclosure Attorney

USA-TN-Memphis

Memphis office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks foreclosure attorney with experien...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top