Drinker Biddle & Reath Attorney Overbilled Client
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Drinker Biddle & Reath

Summary: A former staff attorney for Drinker Biddle & Reath over-billed his time by almost 419 hours, resulting in a two-year suspension.

Hart Perkel was given a two-year suspension from practicing law after confessing to over-billing his time of document review with Drinker Biddle & Reath. His suspension is retroactive to June 2014 when he was first placed on temporary suspension.


Perkel was working as a staff attorney at Drinker Biddle from November 2011 to November 2012 during which he was reviewing documents for litigation on behalf of the firm’s client Maxus Energy Corp. He was being paid $40 an hour while the firm billed clients $245 an hour. Perkel over-billed by 418.5 hours, or a total of $102,500. He has been paying back the firm by $100 each month.

The discrepancy in his hours surfaced when the firm compared their e-discovery system to their time accounting system and Perkel’s hours didn’t match up. The firm has internal controls such as two reporting programs to help monitor all billing. Two of Drinker Biddle’s attorneys confronted Perkel, who admitted to the over-billing. He was then terminated. Perkel agreed to pay the firm back the $12,250 in unearned wages. The firm refunded the entire bill charged to the client.

Perkel self-reported his misconduct to the disciplinary board. This and other factors such as his cooperation with the board, expressed remorse, no record of prior discipline, and being young and inexperienced affected their decision for a two year sentence. Perkel was prepared to present evidence that is ADD, depression, and other conditions affected his actions if the case went to trial.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The three-member panel disciplinary board of board members Lawrence M Kelly, Brian J Cali, and P Brennan Hart recommended the two-year suspension. The Supreme Court granted that recommendation. Perkel was represented by Andrew Chirls of Fineman Krekstein & Harris.




Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-CA-Menlo Park

Menlo Park office of sophisticated boutique firm is seeking a corporate attorney with experience in ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Computer Science Patent Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level patent attorney with 3-5 years of intellectual pr...

Apply Now


Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH


Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Executive Assistant / Office Administrator


If you have administrative support experience in the legal industry, or even paralegal expertise,...

Apply now

Associate - Mid-Level - GL Group


Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Westchester office to fill General Liability position. ...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal


We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now


To Top