Billable Hours Deepen Lawyer Burnout

The billable hour remains the biggest obstacle to real time off. Most industries judge workers by results or creativity. In contrast, lawyers still face heavy pressure to meet yearly hour targets.

This creates a clear conflict. Time off lowers recorded hours, so many attorneys feel they must “earn” their vacations by working late before and after a trip. The extra work cancels out any chance to recover, increasing lawyer burnout.

Some describe vacation as “paying a bill.” Each day away requires more hours later. In law, rest often carries a financial and professional penalty.

Court Schedules and Client Needs Limit Breaks

Legal work runs on strict deadlines. Hearings, filings, depositions, and client emergencies appear with little notice. Many lawyers cannot delay or delegate key tasks.

Because of this, attorneys postpone vacations, cut trips short, or travel with laptops. Many feel they must be prepared for a sudden crisis. This lack of control makes real downtime rare and increases the stress that leads to lawyer burnout.

Law Firm Culture Rewards Constant Availability

Even when firms claim to support balance, many still reward nonstop work. Attorneys feel pressure to stay reachable, answer messages quickly, and avoid taking long breaks.

In many firms:

• A full week off looks risky
• Slow responses during vacation appear unprofessional
• High billers receive more praise than well-balanced attorneys
• Lawyers feel guilty when others cover their work

This culture discourages rest. Young lawyers, especially those seeking partnership, fear that taking time off will damage their reputation. This pressure fuels ongoing lawyer burnout.

Technology Turns Vacations Into “Working Time Off”

Today’s tools make constant access unavoidable. Phones, laptops, and remote platforms keep attorneys connected in every time zone. Instead of supporting balance, this nonstop access erases boundaries.

Many lawyers check email throughout their trips. Some edit briefs from hotel rooms or join virtual meetings while away. These “pseudo-vacations” offer new scenery but no real mental rest. The lack of separation fuels lawyer burnout and prevents the recovery attorneys urgently need.

How Failing to Disconnect Fuels Lawyer Burnout

Research shows that uninterrupted rest reduces stress and improves productivity. For lawyers, who report higher rates of anxiety and depression, real breaks matter.

When attorneys cannot disconnect, lawyer burnout increases. Burnout harms firms through reduced performance, poor morale, and higher turnover. A profession that values endurance over rest risks weakening its workforce.

Strategies Firms Can Use to Prevent Lawyer Burnout Through Better Time Off

Experts offer several steps to encourage real rest:

1. Offer Billable-Hour Credit for Vacation

Some firms now provide limited credit hours toward annual goals so that vacation does not create penalties.

2. Improve Delegation and Workflow

Coverage teams and structured planning reduce crises when someone is away.

3. Normalize Taking Time Off

Leaders should take vacations themselves and encourage associates to do the same.

4. Set Clear Boundaries

Policies should limit non-urgent communication with lawyers on approved leave.

5. Strengthen Mental-Health Support

Real wellness requires systems that support actual rest, not slogans.

A Critical Moment for the Legal Field to Address Lawyer Burnout

The industry now recognizes that meaningful vacation time is essential. Yet lawyers still face more barriers to rest than most professionals. To prevent lawyer burnout, firms must reform the billable-hour model and reshape cultural expectations.

Real vacations should not be rare. They should be a normal part of sustaining professional excellence and personal well-being.

Looking for a firm where balance, culture, and real time off are more than just talking points?
Explore thousands of law firm opportunities at LawCrossing, where you can compare work environments, billing expectations, and career paths to find the job that supports your well-being. Start your search today at LawCrossing.com and take control of your legal career.

The post Lawyer Burnout: Causes and Real Solutions first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Learn more from this report: Law Firm Culture: How to Identify, Compare, and Thrive in the Right Environment

What Defines a Law Firm’s Culture
Law firm culture encompasses far more than office perks or social events—it reflects the firm’s values, management style, diversity and inclusion practices, work-life balance, compensation philosophy, and even its approach to mentoring and professional development. The tone of a workplace is shaped by factors such as leadership behavior, partnership dynamics, and how the firm treats associates at every stage of their career.

For instance, large national or “BigLaw” firms often emphasize high performance, long hours, and billable hour targets ranging from 1,900 to 2,400 annually. In contrast, smaller boutique firms may offer more flexibility, hands-on client exposure, and closer working relationships with partners—though often with fewer resources or lower compensation.

Variations Across Markets and Practices
Culture also differs depending on location and practice area. A New York corporate firm might prioritize prestige, profit, and intensity, while a California-based technology practice may emphasize collaboration, innovation, and flexibility. Likewise, litigation practices may reward individual advocacy and courtroom performance, while transactional teams often value teamwork and client service coordination.

Warning Signs of a Troubled Culture
Before joining a firm, candidates should look for red flags such as high turnover, vague advancement criteria, a lack of mentorship, inconsistent feedback, or limited diversity initiatives. A firm overly dependent on a few powerful rainmakers may also indicate instability or limited growth opportunities for others.

Evaluating the Fit
The article encourages job seekers to ask targeted questions during interviews—such as how feedback is given, what successful associates have in common, and how partners engage with junior lawyers. Candidates should also consult external resources like Vault, Chambers & Partners, and Glassdoor to get unfiltered insights.

Thriving Once You’re There
Even after joining, thriving within a law firm requires both adaptability and authenticity. Building relationships, seeking mentorship, understanding informal norms, and contributing to the firm’s mission can accelerate career success.

Final Takeaway
Law firm culture is not an afterthought—it’s a core factor in your professional fulfillment. By understanding what drives a firm’s environment and aligning it with your personal values, you can find a setting where you not only succeed but truly thrive.

Learn more from this report: Law Firm Culture: How to Identify, Compare, and Thrive in the Right Environment

The post Understanding Law Firm Culture—Your Key to Thriving in the Right Environment first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

The era of flexible remote work that defined much of the legal industry post-pandemic appears to be waning. Across the U.S. and the U.K., several major law firms are reinforcing in-office mandates, signaling a decisive shift toward traditional workplace expectations. Firms including Cooley LLP, Goodwin Procter LLP, and Dechert LLP have recently announced stricter attendance requirements that will take effect in early 2025, marking another step away from the remote and hybrid models that became standard during the height of COVID-19.

A Return to In-Person Collaboration

Goodwin Procter, one of the most prominent global law firms, informed its attorneys that starting January 5, 2025, they will be required to work four days per week in the office — specifically from Monday through Thursday. The change comes after years of operating under a more lenient three-day hybrid schedule. In an internal memo, firm leaders explained that the updated policy reflects Goodwin’s belief in the importance of building strong, face-to-face professional relationships.

“Delivering on our ambitious strategy takes the kind of strong relationships that benefit from close and frequent in-person connection and collaboration,” the memo stated. The firm emphasized that while hybrid work remains valued, more time in the office would strengthen mentorship opportunities, team cohesion, and client engagement.

Cooley Tightens Its Policy

Similarly, Cooley LLP, a firm long recognized for its progressive and flexible work culture, announced that it will enforce a four-day in-office policy for its U.S. and European lawyers beginning January 1, 2025. The move is significant given that Cooley had previously allowed attorneys to work fully remotely in 2022. While the firm did not disclose exactly when that policy ended, its new direction reflects a growing sentiment among managing partners that physical proximity is essential for sustaining productivity and innovation in legal practice.

Recruiters and consultants note that Cooley’s updated policy aligns with a broader trend in the legal sector: the pendulum is swinging back toward in-person work as firms look to reestablish a sense of community and accountability that many partners feel was lost in remote settings.

Dechert Implements Tiered Office Requirements

At Dechert LLP, the firm is taking a more nuanced approach. Its new hybrid policy, effective February 2, 2025, will vary by seniority. Associates in their second year and business services professionals will be required to work in the office four days per week, while third-year associates and counsel will be required to attend three days. Partners, who were already expected to maintain a four-day in-office presence, will continue with their existing schedule.

Dechert’s leadership stated that the adjustment was made to “encourage collaboration and professional development” while still maintaining a level of flexibility for more senior lawyers. The policy reflects a growing belief among firm leaders that consistent face-to-face time helps younger associates gain mentorship and develop essential professional skills more effectively than remote work allows.

Why Firms Are Reconsidering Remote Work

According to legal industry recruiters and analysts, the trend toward stricter in-office policies is driven by several factors. Many managing partners believe that returning to the office fosters better collaboration, strengthens firm culture, and improves training for junior associates.

There is also a practical dimension. With firms paying millions annually for premium office space in major cities like New York, London, and Washington, D.C., leadership teams are under pressure to justify the expense. A visible, active workplace helps maintain client confidence and reinforces the firm’s investment in collaboration and firm culture.

Not Everyone Is Following the Trend

While many firms are adopting stricter in-office requirements, others continue to champion flexibility as a key differentiator in recruitment and retention. Firms such as Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Husch Blackwell LLP, and Fennemore Craig P.C. are maintaining or even expanding their remote-work options. For these firms, flexibility remains a competitive advantage in attracting high-performing attorneys who prioritize work-life balance.

Quinn Emanuel, for instance, has continued to allow lawyers significant discretion in where they work, emphasizing results over physical presence. Meanwhile, Husch Blackwell and Fennemore Craig have integrated remote work into their long-term business models, using it as a tool to appeal to geographically diverse and specialized talent pools.

Still, recruiters observe that the number of firms maintaining fully remote or highly flexible arrangements is shrinking, especially in major legal hubs. Many firms that once offered open-ended remote options are now quietly revising their policies to include stronger in-person expectations.

Balancing Employee Preferences and Firm Needs

The shift has not been universally welcomed. Some attorneys, particularly those who relocated during the pandemic or adjusted to home-based work routines, have expressed frustration with the new mandates. For them, increased office attendance can add commuting time, childcare complications, and reduced flexibility.

However, firm leadership argues that the benefits of in-office collaboration outweigh these concerns. They maintain that consistent, in-person interaction fosters mentorship, facilitates spontaneous problem-solving, and nurtures a stronger sense of belonging — all of which are vital to client service and career development.

A New Normal for the Legal Industry

As law firms navigate post-pandemic realities, many are attempting to strike a balance between flexibility and structure. The reemergence of traditional office mandates represents more than just a cultural shift — it’s an acknowledgment that the apprenticeship nature of legal work still thrives best in person.

While some flexibility will remain, the days of fully remote law practice appear to be fading fast. For young associates and firm leaders alike, 2025 may mark the beginning of a new era — one that blends lessons learned from the pandemic with a renewed appreciation for the traditional law office dynamic.

For lawyers exploring firms that balance flexibility with opportunity, visit LawCrossing.com — your top resource for the latest legal job openings and firm insights.

The post Law Firms Reinforce Office Mandates as Remote Work Declines first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Learn more from this report: Law Firm Culture Index 2026

Major Findings at a Glance

• Smaller, boutique firms demonstrate the strongest results in work-life balance: firms with 2–14 attorneys averaged a 7.8/10 score, significantly higher than large (100–499 attorneys) or BigLaw firms (500+ attorneys) which scored on average 6.8 and 6.2 respectively.
• Regional trends reveal that West Coast markets—such as San Francisco, Los Angeles and Seattle—lead in culture and satisfaction metrics. Conversely, traditional strongholds like New York and Washington, D.C. show more mixed performance.
• Practice-area results highlight that intellectual property and employment law practices deliver the highest satisfaction and balance scores (8.1/10 and 7.9/10 respectively), while corporate/M&A practices, though highly remunerative, scored lower on satisfaction (7.0/10) and exhibited more variation.
• The correlation between compensation and satisfaction proved weak (R² = 0.23), indicating that higher pay does not necessarily translate into a stronger culture or better attorney experience.
• Industry trends over the past five years reflect positive momentum: work-life balance improved by approximately 15% across firm sizes, about 78% of firms now offer remote/hybrid work, and diversity & inclusion initiatives increased by roughly 42%.

Top-Rated Firms
The Index’s top-performing firms are led by boutique and mid-sized practices rather than traditional BigLaw behemoths. One such leader achieved an industry-leading culture score of 9.2/10.

What This Means for Attorneys & Firms
For attorneys exploring opportunities, the Index serves as a critical tool:

• Target firms that align with your values and preferred work-life balance, not just the brand name or compensation.
• During interviews, probe about remote work options, mentorship programs, clear advancement tracks and cultural feedback mechanisms.
• View total compensation in a broader context: flexibility, culture and career development matter significantly to long-term satisfaction.

For law-firm leadership and management:

• Conduct regular anonymous culture surveys and feedback loops—top firms do so every quarter to track sentiment and address concerns proactively.
• Invest in leadership development for senior attorneys and promote transparent, merit-based advancement paths.
• Design flexible work policies and wellness programs that support attorney integration of professional and personal life.

Learn more from this report: Law Firm Culture Index 2026

The post A New Benchmark in Legal Workplace Insight first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

In a legal industry increasingly defined by multi-tiered partnership models, Ropes & Gray LLP stands out as a rare exception. While many elite law firms have adopted the two-tier structure—distinguishing between equity and non-equity partners—Ropes & Gray has chosen to preserve its traditional one-tier partnership system, in which every partner holds an equity stake.

This decision underscores the firm’s commitment to equality among its partners and highlights a fundamental debate about what it truly means to be a “partner” in modern Big Law.

A Different Kind of Partnership

According to a recent report, Ropes & Gray’s approach bucks the prevailing industry trend. In today’s market, most Am Law 100 firms have created non-equity partner tracks to recognize senior lawyers’ contributions without extending full ownership rights. These positions often serve as stepping stones between senior counsel roles and full partnership, offering higher prestige and pay without the financial risk or buy-in that comes with equity status.

By contrast, Ropes & Gray’s one-tier structure treats all partners as full equity stakeholders—sharing in both the profits and liabilities of the firm. Every partner participates in firm governance, strategy, and performance outcomes, reinforcing a collective sense of responsibility.

Legal management consultant Janet Stanton, explained that this makes Ropes & Gray an “outlier” in a profession where flexibility and layered compensation systems have become the norm. “The one-tier model,” she said, “requires a high level of trust and cultural cohesion that few firms can sustain in today’s competitive environment.”

Why the Two-Tier Model Took Over

The two-tier system emerged in the 1990s as firms grew larger and more corporate in structure. With increased client demands and complex global operations, many firms found it necessary to create a middle tier between senior associates and full equity partners.

The non-equity tier allows firms to:

• Recognize achievement without immediately granting ownership.
• Retain top talent by offering status and better pay while limiting profit-sharing dilution.
• Adjust to market pressures with flexible compensation systems.
• Provide an exit path for senior lawyers who no longer want the financial exposure of equity partnership.

For law firms, this model offers practical benefits. It helps manage profit margins, maintain financial stability, and attract lawyers who value leadership recognition without the burden of capital contributions or management duties.

However, critics argue that the model creates a hierarchy within the partnership ranks, diluting the meaning of the title “partner.” In some firms, non-equity partners have limited voting rights or influence, and their compensation may depend heavily on billable hours rather than firm profits.

Ropes & Gray’s Philosophy: Shared Ownership, Shared Accountability

Ropes & Gray’s leadership believes that maintaining a single partnership tier promotes a stronger, more unified culture. By ensuring that all partners have “skin in the game,” the firm fosters collective accountability and mutual investment in long-term success.

The firm’s model is also attractive to potential recruits seeking a more transparent and meritocratic environment. In Ropes & Gray’s system, making partner means full equity participation—not a provisional or half-measure title. That clarity can be a powerful incentive for ambitious lawyers seeking genuine ownership.

Why Other Firms Won’t Likely Follow

Despite Ropes & Gray’s success, experts caution that few firms are likely to emulate its structure. The two-tier model remains entrenched across the Am Law 200, largely due to its financial flexibility. It allows firms to reward more partners without sacrificing profits per equity partner—a key metric in the competitive lateral-recruiting market.

Additionally, as firms continue to expand globally and diversify their practices, the one-tier model becomes harder to sustain. Differences in markets, billing rates, and client bases make a uniform equity structure less practical.

Stanton emphasized that Ropes & Gray’s model “reflects a specific culture, not a universal solution.” Most large firms simply don’t have the cohesion or consistent profitability required to make full equity partnership viable for all senior attorneys.

Implications for Lawyers and the Industry

For attorneys navigating partnership tracks, Ropes & Gray’s approach is a reminder to look beyond titles and examine what partnership really means at their firm.

• At two-tier firms, non-equity partnership may still be an important milestone, but it’s often more akin to a senior management role than true ownership.
• At one-tier firms like Ropes & Gray, partnership represents both prestige and risk—a genuine investment in the firm’s future.

For law firms, the debate highlights a deeper question: should “partner” signify ownership or status? In a market driven by metrics like profits per partner and lateral movement, that distinction can profoundly affect culture, retention, and long-term strategy.

The Bottom Line

Ropes & Gray’s commitment to a one-tier partnership model sets it apart in an industry where non-equity structures have become the rule rather than the exception. Its approach underscores a belief in equality, shared purpose, and firmwide accountability—values that many firms espouse but few fully implement.

While this structure may not be replicable for every law firm, it offers an intriguing blueprint for those seeking to preserve the traditional meaning of partnership amid an era of corporate pragmatism.

Ropes & Gray may stand alone today, but its model invites an important conversation about the future of partnership in Big Law—and what truly defines a firm’s unity and strength.

Interested in joining a firm that values true partnership and professional growth? Explore thousands of legal opportunities on LawCrossing—the largest legal job site dedicated to connecting talented lawyers with top-tier firms.

The post Ropes and Gray Represents the Exception — Not the Norm — in Non-Equity Partner Models first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

As young lawyers step into the legal profession, they often find themselves caught between ambition, pressure, and uncertainty. The transition from law school to practice is rarely seamless, and it takes years of experience to understand what truly matters in this demanding field. Over time, certain lessons stand out—lessons about discipline, professionalism, ethics, and self-awareness.

Looking back, one piece of advice from my first boss has stayed with me: “Don’t make your client’s problem your own.” This simple yet powerful statement holds an essential truth about the practice of law—while we advocate passionately for our clients, we must also maintain emotional and professional boundaries to protect our judgment, health, and career longevity.

Below are some thoughts and insights—shaped by experience and observation—that every young lawyer can benefit from as they build their legal careers.

Start Your Day Early and Plan Ahead

Being one of the first people in the office offers more advantages than just extra time. Early mornings provide a calm space to organize your tasks, gather your thoughts, and prepare for the unexpected challenges that often arise in legal practice.

Make it a habit to review your calendar daily and weekly. Double-check deadlines, filing dates, and client meetings. Responsibility for managing your schedule ultimately rests on you. Missing a filing or forgetting a meeting is not something you can easily delegate—or excuse.

Effective time management and preparation are the foundation of trust in this profession. When your colleagues and clients see you as reliable and composed, they’ll be more inclined to trust you with greater responsibilities.

Sharpen Your Writing and Communication Skills

Strong legal writing is one of the most valuable assets you can cultivate. It reflects how clearly you think, how well you reason, and how persuasively you advocate.

If you can afford it, invest in a premium writing tool such as Grammarly or Wordtune. These programs can help polish your work and catch errors that slip past the human eye. However, no software can replace clear, concise thought. Use active voice. Favor strong nouns and verbs. Avoid unnecessary modifiers.

Beyond writing, develop your public speaking and communication abilities. Join a Toastmasters club, take an improv class, or volunteer to present at firm meetings. The ability to express ideas clearly—both in writing and aloud—will set you apart as a confident professional.

Treat Your Firm Like a Client

This is one of the most overlooked but valuable lessons for junior lawyers: your firm is your first client. Treat partners, supervisors, and colleagues with the same respect, responsiveness, and attention you would give to paying clients.

When you make a mistake, acknowledge it immediately. Take ownership and present a plan to fix it. Every lawyer, regardless of experience, makes errors—but integrity and accountability define your professional reputation. Hiding mistakes or shifting blame will always do more harm than good.

Build Genuine Relationships

Law is a relationship-driven profession. Success depends not only on your legal skills but also on your ability to connect with others. Take the time to know your colleagues, mentors, and staff. Have lunch with them, attend firm gatherings, and show interest in their experiences.

If you’re working remotely, remember that virtual communication can never fully replace in-person interaction—especially early in your career. Presence matters. Face time leads to mentorship, trust, and opportunities that emails and video calls can’t provide.

Outside of work, nurture your personal relationships too. Friends, family, and mentors form your support network—the “village” that sustains you when work becomes overwhelming.

Guard Your Integrity

Your license to practice law is your most valuable professional asset. Never compromise your ethics or values for convenience, money, or approval. The legal field is small, and reputations travel fast.

Avoid cutting corners or rationalizing questionable behavior. If a situation feels ethically gray, it probably is. Seek guidance, but ultimately, protect your integrity above all else. Remember that you alone are responsible for your career decisions and the consequences that follow.

And as you advance in your career, remember one timeless rule: never burn bridges. The legal community is interconnected, and today’s colleague—or even adversary—might be tomorrow’s ally.

Give Back and Mentor Others

The legal profession thrives on mentorship and service. As you gain experience, pay it forward. Offer guidance to law students, interns, and junior associates. Engage in pro bono work. Share lessons from your own mistakes and successes.

Giving back enriches not only those you help but also your own sense of purpose and satisfaction in a demanding career.

Mind the Details—and Your Wellbeing

Small actions often carry the biggest impact. Practice good professional etiquette at all times. Show respect to support staff and treat everyone—from paralegals to partners—with professionalism.

At firm events, know your limits—especially if alcohol is involved. Carry yourself as the professional you are striving to become. And take care of your physical and mental health. Invest in a good desk chair, mattress, and pair of shoes. The long hours of practice will take a toll—so start protecting yourself now.

Find Balance Beyond the Law

When your career ends—or when you reflect on your life decades from now—you won’t wish you had billed more hours. You’ll wish you had read more books, spent more time with loved ones, and pursued experiences outside of work.

Schedule time to disconnect from social media and constant news cycles. Try new things: learn about investments, take a creative writing class, travel, or simply enjoy quiet moments.

Law is a demanding career, but it should not consume your entire identity. Stay curious and open to growth—both as a lawyer and as a person.

For more career insights, legal industry updates, and exclusive job opportunities, visit LawCrossing — the leading job board dedicated to helping legal professionals find the best opportunities to grow their careers.

The post What I’ve Learned: Reflections and Advice for Young Lawyers first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Learn more from this guide: Law Firm Culture: How to Identify, Compare, and Thrive in the Right Environment

What Defines Law Firm Culture

Law firm culture isn’t about free lunches or office perks—it’s about alignment between an attorney’s goals and the firm’s values. The article highlights several key areas that define a firm’s culture:

• Leadership and Communication: Transparency and accessibility of partners often signal a supportive environment.
• Workload and Flexibility: While large firms typically demand higher billable hours and longer paths to partnership, smaller and boutique firms may provide more balanced workloads and faster advancement.
• Mentorship and Development: Firms that invest in structured mentoring programs show stronger retention and growth among associates.
• Diversity and Inclusion: A firm’s true commitment to DEI initiatives often reflects the inclusiveness of its culture.

Finding the Right Fit

BCG emphasizes the importance of self-awareness when evaluating firm culture. Attorneys should reflect on their values, preferred work style, and long-term career goals before interviewing. During interviews, asking questions like “How does the firm support associate development?” or “What is the typical career progression here?” can reveal cultural priorities beyond surface-level benefits.

Geographic and practice-area differences also play a role. For instance, New York firms may emphasize prestige and intensity, while West Coast firms are often known for innovation and flexibility. Boutique firms, meanwhile, tend to foster close collaboration and hands-on experience earlier in an attorney’s career.

Thriving Within Your Firm

Once inside a firm, thriving requires adaptability and initiative. Attorneys should seek multiple mentors, build relationships across teams, and understand how success is measured within their environment. Cultural awareness can help navigate challenges and identify opportunities for growth. However, if values consistently clash, the article advises reassessing whether the current firm aligns with long-term goals.

The Takeaway

In today’s fast-moving legal market, cultural alignment is as crucial as compensation or prestige. Attorneys who take the time to evaluate and choose the right firm culture position themselves for greater satisfaction and sustained success.

Learn more from this guide: Law Firm Culture: How to Identify, Compare, and Thrive in the Right Environment

The post The Critical Role of Law-Firm Culture: How to Identify, Compare and Thrive first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Preparing for parental leave is an exciting milestone, but for many professionals—especially attorneys navigating demanding billable hours, client expectations, and partnership tracks—it can also feel daunting. How do you step away to focus on your family without losing career momentum or diminishing your professional reputation?

The reality is that with thoughtful preparation and clear communication, parental leave doesn’t have to stall your trajectory. By strategically planning your exit, managing your coverage, and setting yourself up for a smooth re-entry, you can protect both your personal time and your professional ambitions.

Below are key strategies to help you plan your parental leave with confidence and return stronger than ever.

1. Know Your Firm’s Policy and Build Your Timeline Early

Start by reviewing your firm or company’s parental leave policies in detail. Understand how much paid and unpaid leave you’re entitled to, whether benefits are the same for primary and secondary caregivers, and whether you’re required to use accrued PTO or short-term disability coverage.

Many firms have recently expanded their parental leave policies, but the fine print still matters—particularly around performance reviews, bonuses, and return-to-work commitments. Once you understand your options, map out a realistic timeline.

Ask yourself:

• When should I formally announce my leave to my supervisor or managing partner?
• How much notice will my team and clients need to prepare for my absence?
• What’s my ideal return date, and do I plan to return full-time or on a phased schedule?

Establishing this timeline early ensures smoother coordination with colleagues and reduces last-minute stress.

2. Create a Clear Coverage and Transition Plan

The hallmark of a successful parental leave plan is a seamless transition. One of the greatest career pitfalls occurs when a professional’s absence disrupts workflow or client service. Avoid that by identifying who will cover your major matters well in advance.

Develop a written transition document that outlines:

• Ongoing cases, deals, or client matters and their current status
• Key contacts, deadlines, and next steps for each project
• The colleague or associate responsible for handling each matter during your leave
• Clear instructions for where to find critical documents, files, and correspondence

Once this plan is complete, review it with your supervisor and colleagues. Then, if appropriate, communicate the plan directly to clients—emphasizing that you’ve taken steps to ensure uninterrupted service. This proactive approach shows accountability and professionalism, reinforcing your reliability even while you’re away.

3. Manage Communication Expectations

One of the most challenging aspects of parental leave—especially in the legal industry—is deciding how “connected” you’ll remain during your time off. While some parents prefer a complete digital break, others feel more comfortable staying loosely informed.

The key is to set boundaries and communicate them clearly. Before you leave, decide:

• Will you check your email occasionally, or delegate full responsibility?
• Who can reach you in case of emergencies, and through what channels?
• How should your out-of-office message frame your availability?

If you choose to stay in touch, make sure it’s minimal and purposeful. Set specific windows (for example, one check-in per week) to avoid slipping into regular work mode. Boundaries are essential not only for your well-being but also to help colleagues respect your time away.

4. Plan Your Return Strategically

Returning to work after parental leave can be as big an adjustment as preparing to leave. To make the transition easier, plan for your re-entry before your departure.

• Schedule a “return conversation” with your manager before you leave, confirming how your workload, billing expectations, and client assignments will be handled when you come back.
• Discuss a ramp-up period if needed. Some firms offer flexible re-entry schedules for the first few weeks, allowing you to rebuild momentum at a sustainable pace.
• Update yourself in advance. A week or two before your return, review major firm updates, client developments, and team changes so you re-enter with context and confidence.

Returning with a plan demonstrates your long-term commitment and helps reestablish your professional presence quickly.

5. Safeguard Your Career Momentum

It’s easy to worry that taking parental leave might slow your progress toward partnership, leadership, or promotion. But your career doesn’t have to lose momentum while you’re away.

To protect your trajectory:

• Keep your professional network active. If possible, maintain light connections with mentors, peers, or professional organizations through brief check-ins or occasional virtual events.
• Document your achievements before you leave—summarize completed cases, wins, or contributions. This ensures nothing is overlooked in performance evaluations while you’re away.
• Re-establish your goals when you return. Meet with your supervisor to align on upcoming opportunities and reassert your ambitions.

Firms value consistency and foresight. Showing that you’ve thought through your leave and return signals the same qualities clients and leadership value most.

6. Prioritize Your Well-Being and Family

Finally, remember why you’re taking parental leave in the first place—to be fully present with your new family. Don’t let guilt or fear of career impact diminish that experience.

• Give yourself permission to disconnect.
• Allow time for adjustment—both emotionally and logistically.
• Reach out to other parents in your firm or network for advice and support.

When you prioritize balance, you’ll return to work not only refreshed but also better equipped to manage your responsibilities with clarity and confidence.

The Bottom Line

Parental leave isn’t a professional setback—it’s an opportunity to show leadership, foresight, and empathy in action. By planning your leave like any other major project—strategically, transparently, and thoughtfully—you can ensure that your career continues to thrive while you embrace one of life’s most meaningful transitions.

Looking for a law firm that values flexibility and supports working parents?
Explore opportunities on LawCrossing—the nation’s #1 job board for legal professionals seeking workplaces that champion work-life balance and long-term career success.

The post How to Plan Your Parental Leave Without Derailing Your Legal Career first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

In the competitive world of BigLaw, not every difficult task is a learning opportunity. According to recent discussions among legal professionals, some law firms appear to be using punishing workloads and undesirable assignments as subtle—or sometimes blatant—disciplinary tactics. What is being described as “punishment by assignment” has emerged as a concerning trend, shedding light on how internal politics, pressure, and performance expectations can turn daily work into a tool of coercion.

When “Challenging Work” Crosses the Line

Most attorneys understand that demanding assignments are part of a lawyer’s growth. Complex cases, high-stakes filings, and intricate discovery work all contribute to professional development. However, in some firms, associates report being deliberately saddled with monotonous, low-visibility, or excessively stressful work as an informal form of discipline.

These projects often involve unreasonable deadlines, long hours, and little to no partner supervision. Rather than providing mentorship or skill-building, such assignments can feel like a message: you’re not performing, you’re not favored, or it might be time to leave.

As one industry insider noted, some firms use “grueling assignments” not to train, but to discourage—pushing attorneys toward burnout or voluntary resignation without the need for formal termination. In effect, these assignments become a quiet exit strategy for management.

Why Firms Use “Punishment Assignments”

The motivations behind these tactics vary, but they often tie back to firm economics and internal hierarchy.

1. Attrition Management:
When a firm wants to reduce headcount without publicly firing associates, overwhelming them with unmanageable or undesirable work can be an indirect way to encourage departures. This practice allows leadership to maintain a façade of stability while reducing staff organically.

2. Cultural Control:
Sometimes, punishment assignments serve as warnings. When an associate challenges leadership, questions firm culture, or fails to meet unwritten behavioral expectations, they may find themselves suddenly burdened with less appealing work. It sends a message to others: compliance and conformity are rewarded, dissent is not.

3. Billable Economics:
Associates who are perceived as less efficient, less trusted, or “not partner material” may be relegated to high-volume, low-value tasks simply to keep their billable hours afloat. Meanwhile, coveted assignments go to those with stronger political alignment or mentorship ties.

Whatever the motivation, the result is the same: morale drops, turnover rises, and the culture becomes one of quiet fear rather than collaboration.

The Human Cost of Coercive Workloads

While partners may view these assignments as harmless pressure, the consequences for associates can be severe. Constant exposure to stress, overwork, and lack of recognition takes both a mental and physical toll.

Associates caught in these cycles often experience:

• Burnout from extended hours and unpredictable workloads.
• Isolation when they are excluded from meaningful client-facing opportunities.
• Erosion of confidence due to constant negative feedback or limited visibility.
• Career stagnation, as punitive assignments offer little in terms of learning or advancement.

Some attorneys quietly seek transfers within the firm, while others leave the profession entirely. Ironically, these environments can end up driving out some of the most hardworking and ethical lawyers—those unwilling to compromise integrity for firm politics.

What Associates Can Do to Protect Themselves

Facing a punitive work cycle can be daunting, but there are ways associates can respond strategically without immediate confrontation.

1. Keep Records:
Maintain a detailed log of assignments, feedback, and communications. Clear documentation helps reveal patterns of unfair workload distribution and may be crucial if HR intervention becomes necessary.

2. Build Relationships:
Seek out mentors and allies within the firm who can advocate for you. A supportive senior attorney can provide visibility, context, and protection from biased decision-making.

3. Communicate Professionally:
When possible, clarify expectations with supervisors. Ask about goals, deadlines, and success criteria in writing. Transparency can help reduce ambiguity and demonstrate professionalism.

4. Focus on Skill Development:
Even in challenging circumstances, look for aspects of the assignment that enhance your expertise or strengthen your resume.

5. Reevaluate Fit:
If the culture consistently rewards compliance over contribution, it may be time to explore new opportunities. There are firms that value growth, collaboration, and transparency—and you deserve to be in one.

The Broader Reflection: Firm Culture Under Scrutiny

The rise of “punishment assignments” signals a deeper cultural challenge in the legal industry. Associates are expected to perform under intense conditions, but when stress becomes a deliberate management tactic, it crosses into ethical gray areas.

Law firms often market themselves as champions of professional development, diversity, and work-life balance. Yet, when punitive workloads are used to manage behavior or encourage attrition, it exposes a disconnect between branding and reality.

Experts argue that firms should instead invest in constructive performance management—offering mentorship, feedback, and improvement plans rather than quiet punishment. Firms that rely on coercion risk reputational harm, diminished retention, and the loss of top-tier talent to more supportive environments.

A Call for Transparency and Accountability

Ultimately, law firms that promote transparency and fairness are more likely to thrive in today’s competitive market. Associates who feel respected and supported are more productive, loyal, and engaged.

As the conversation around workplace culture in BigLaw continues, it’s becoming clear that punishing employees through workload manipulation isn’t just counterproductive—it’s unsustainable. The next generation of lawyers is demanding something different: respect, communication, and a culture that values development over intimidation.

If you’re an attorney experiencing career stagnation, toxic firm dynamics, or unfair workloads, take control of your path. Visit LawCrossing.com to explore thousands of verified legal job openings directly from employers that prioritize growth, fairness, and long-term success.

The post When “Tough” Work Is a Wake-Up Call: Some Firms Use Harsh Assignments as Pressure Tactics first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Foley Hoag LLP has made a strategic leadership move, bringing on Jessica Maroney Shillito, formerly of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, as the firm’s new Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). The appointment reflects Foley Hoag’s continued investment in promoting inclusivity and addressing the evolving expectations around workplace equity in the legal sector.

Shillito joins Foley Hoag at a crucial time when law firms across the U.S. are recalibrating their DEI strategies amid mounting external and internal pressures. The legal industry’s commitment to diversity initiatives has been under a microscope, following political and social debates challenging corporate DEI programs. In response, many firms are reinforcing leadership roles in this area to reaffirm their dedication to inclusion and equitable representation.

A Proven DEI Leader

At Paul Weiss, Shillito served as part of the firm’s DEI team, working under Chief Inclusion Officer Danyale Price, a veteran leader who has helped shape the firm’s award-winning inclusion programs for nearly two decades. During her tenure, Shillito contributed to firmwide initiatives that supported attorney engagement, inclusive leadership development, and community partnerships aimed at improving representation within the legal profession.

Now stepping into a top leadership role at Foley Hoag, Shillito will lead a four-person DEI team and co-chair the firm’s diversity committee. Her responsibilities will include implementing firmwide strategies to advance equity, promoting cultural competency, and ensuring accountability at every level of the organization.

In a statement shared by Foley Hoag, Shillito said she is “deeply honored to join a firm that recognizes the importance of inclusion not just as a value, but as a professional standard that enhances both client service and firm culture.” She emphasized the importance of “building a workplace where authenticity, respect, and opportunity are central to success.”

Foley Hoag’s Ongoing DEI Commitment

Foley Hoag’s decision to expand its DEI leadership underscores the firm’s long-standing commitment to inclusive excellence. Over the past decade, Foley Hoag has received recognition for its initiatives to support underrepresented attorneys, including mentorship programs, inclusive recruiting practices, and firmwide education around cultural awareness and bias reduction.

The firm’s Managing Partners have also publicly reaffirmed their belief that fostering diversity is essential to innovation and client service. “We see inclusion as both a moral and strategic imperative,” one partner said in a recent internal memo. “Jessica’s leadership will help us deepen that commitment and build stronger frameworks for accountability.”

In recent years, Foley Hoag has joined a number of other firms in establishing measurable DEI goals—ranging from increasing diverse representation in partnership ranks to improving retention rates among minority attorneys. Shillito’s appointment aligns with these broader objectives, as the firm seeks to turn DEI principles into sustainable practice.

Navigating the Changing Landscape of DEI in Law

Shillito’s move comes amid a shifting environment for DEI programs nationwide. Following recent legal and political challenges to corporate diversity initiatives, many law firms have faced questions about how best to pursue inclusion while ensuring compliance with new legal frameworks.

Despite the uncertainty, industry experts say that law firms remain steadfast in their belief that diverse teams deliver better client outcomes, innovation, and workplace morale. “DEI isn’t just a moral choice—it’s a business necessity,” said one legal analyst familiar with the matter. “Firms that invest in genuine inclusion will continue to attract top talent and maintain credibility with modern clients.”

By hiring a leader from Paul Weiss—a firm known for its high-profile social justice initiatives and strong DEI reputation—Foley Hoag signals that it intends to remain proactive and resilient in this evolving landscape.

The Broader Implications for Legal Recruiting

Foley Hoag’s recruitment of Shillito also reflects a broader trend in the legal industry: a growing demand for professionals with DEI expertise who can navigate both the operational and cultural challenges within firms. As diversity metrics increasingly factor into client evaluations, law firms are seeking leaders who can balance compliance, advocacy, and measurable impact.

According to legal industry observers, more firms are now hiring directors and chiefs of diversity who bring strategic management experience and data-driven insight—skills that align DEI goals with firm profitability and long-term growth.

Shillito’s cross-firm transition demonstrates that such expertise is highly valued—and transferable across leading firms. It also suggests that the next generation of DEI leadership in law will be expected to combine compassion with strategy, and advocacy with measurable outcomes.

Looking Ahead

With this new appointment, Foley Hoag appears poised to enhance its national reputation as a progressive, inclusive law firm that invests in its people. The firm’s commitment to empowering diverse talent, promoting equity, and creating authentic inclusion positions it well for the next phase of industry evolution.

Shillito’s arrival marks not just a personnel change, but a reaffirmation of Foley Hoag’s belief that inclusion is integral to legal excellence. As the DEI landscape continues to evolve, the firm’s leadership move may well serve as a blueprint for others navigating similar challenges.

Explore Legal Career Opportunities

If you’re inspired by Foley Hoag’s leadership in diversity and want to be part of a forward-thinking law firm, explore thousands of exclusive, direct-from-employer legal jobs at LawCrossing.com. Whether you’re a DEI professional, an attorney, or an aspiring law firm leader, LawCrossing connects you with the most comprehensive database of legal opportunities in the U.S.—many you won’t find anywhere else.

Stay informed. Stay connected. Build your future with LawCrossing.

The post Foley Hoag Recruits DEI Leader from Paul Weiss Amid Industry Scrutiny first appeared on JDJournal Blog.