Breaking News

Investigation Discovers Disney and Universal Studio Employees Arrested for Child Sex Crimes
Download PDF


Robert Kingsolver used to work at Walt Disney World. Now, his life is over after being arrested in a child sex sting, according to CNN. Kingsolver talked with CNN, saying, “My life is ruined. My family’s life is ruined. My kids’ life is ruined. I’ve devastated my parents because of bad judgment.”

Kingsolver is just one of 35 employees from Disney who have been arrested since 2006 and accused of sex crimes involving children. These crimes include possession of child pornography and trying to meet a child for sex.


CNN conducted a six-month long investigation of police and court records to find this information. The investigation also unearthed five employees of Universal Studios and two SeaWorld employees who have been arrested for such crimes.

Out of all these cases, 32 have been convicted and the rest are pending. Two of the cases occurred on Disney property involving possession of child pornography. None of the cases involved any teenagers or children visiting the theme parks.

Kingsolver used to work as a service manager at the Magic Kingdom. He would oversee repairs to rides. He has entered a non guilty plea to charges of soliciting a child for sexual acts and traveling to meet a minor for unlawful sexual activity.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Kingsolver said he thought he was meeting a 14-year-old girl for sex at a house. The meeting was created by detectives from the Lake County Sheriff’s Office. Kingsolver told CNN that he wanted to protect the girl and that he was going to call police when he arrived. He said his family still supports him.

“They love me,” Kingsolver said. “My kids know me, and they know how much I care for kids. They know that their dad is not somebody that will go out and hurt a young child. They know their dad is somebody that would go out and protect a young child at any cost.”

Disney spokeswoman Jacque Wahler wrote a statement to CNN that said, “Providing a safe environment for children and families is a responsibility we take very seriously. We have extensive measures in place, including pre-employment and ongoing criminal background checks and computer monitoring and firewalls. The numbers reported by CNN represent one one-hundredth of one percent of the 300,000 people we have employed during this time period. We continue to work closely with law enforcement and organizations like the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children as we constantly strengthen our efforts.”

Tom Schroder, a spokesman for Universal Studios said the following in a statement:

“We have zero tolerance for this kind of activity. We deal with situations such as this immediately and permanently.” The company requires that “all our team members undergo thorough background checks as part of the hiring process.”

Nick Gollattscheck is a spokesman from SeaWorld. He said, “The safety of our team members and employees is our top priority. The company has policies and procedures in place and we need to take appropriate action as needed.”

The sheriff for Polk County, Grady Judd, feels that businesses that cater to children should have more leeway to use polygraph tests when screening and hiring employees.

“Anyone that works around children, whether it’s a church, in the nursery, or whether it’s Disney or any of our other theme parks, we should be able to give a polygraph examination to them,” Judd said.

Congress does not allow companies to administer polygraph tests when it comes to hiring employees. But, U.S. Rep. Dennis Ross (R-Florida), has come up with a proposal that would provide an exemption to the Polygraph Act of 1988.

“We owe it to ourselves, we owe it to our children, we owe it to our future to make sure we don’t let the next predator find a victim,” Ross said. “You know I can’t put the label on any particular employer because there’s just too many of them — period. And it doesn’t matter so much the industry but it’s the act that it’s happening. And I understand the propensity is probably greater where there are more opportunities to be around children and that’s something that I find that we have to offer them the tools necessary so that we can prevent it.”

Chat logs have been released by police officers in the Kingsolver case that show he knew he was talking with a 14-year-old girl.

He wrote the following in the chat logs: “I work for Disney so I love to see dads having fun with their daughters. I believe in treating a lady like a princess. I treat ladies with respect because that is how I hope my daughter gets treated.”

Kingsolver told CNN in his interview that “I’m not the monster that people are saying I am, and that the news, CNN and everyone else is saying that I am. I’m an honest guy that I thought was trying to help and I thought I was trying to do the right thing. Did I do it in the right manner? No, obviously not.”

Kingsolver has a daughter, a son and two stepchildren. He is separated from his wife. He told CNN the following about his former job:

“It was like going to a fun — some place you really enjoyed,” he said. “The best part about that job was just seeing families. Some family you knew had saved up literally for a decade to come there and spend a few days. Just to see them having fun and to see the, you know, look on the children’s faces when they get to see, you know, Prince Charming or one of the princesses or you know, riding Barnstormer or anything, or any of the rides or just walking around and maybe running into Mickey. It was just, that was the best part, just seeing kids glow and seeing their heroes. I just enjoyed that so much.”

When asked by CNN why he had a sexual chat with a 14-year-old girl, he said:

“I was trying to get someone safe. I honestly thought someone was in danger and if I had to tell him anything, if I had to tell him the moon was made out of cheese, I would have told him that. I have no intention and had no intention of doing anything with anyone, any minor.”

After his arrest, booking and release, he returned to work the next day. Kingsolver said he was placed on unpaid leave by Disney upon his return.


  1. Irie Keith Garcia

    July 18, 2014 at 2:01 am

    To be responsible is to be careful. Everyone has the responsibility to secure safe and avoid from any accidents.Yet, I found a safety service that helps you keep safe. Whenever you have an emergency, you just have to press the panic button to be connected to your safety network and be directly routed to the nearest 911.

  2. Doug Williams PolygraphCom

    July 18, 2014 at 4:47 pm

    The protection provided to some people by the EMPLOYEE POLYGRAPH PROTECTION ACT should not be amended to allow others to be “tested”, but it should be extended to protect everyone from this insidious Orwellian instrument of torture! Shame on anyone who administers these “tests”, shame on Dennis Ross for trying to force more people to submit to polygraph “testing”, and shame on the government for continuing to allow this state sponsored sadism!

    I am the only licensed polygraph expert who has ever told the truth about the polygraph, and the truth is, the polygraph is not a “lie detector”. I have been telling the truth about the scam called lie detection for almost forty years now in hopes of destroying the dangerous myth of “lie detection”. Carl Sagan said, “If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be destroyed by the truth.” I was instrumental in destroying a large part of the polygraph industry by getting most polygraph testing outlawed in the private sector. In 1988, with the passage of the EPPA, administering polygraph tests actually became a federal crime! Even the U.S. Supreme Court refused to admit polygraph results into evidence, and ironically it was the U.S. Justice Department who argued that the polygraph results were not reliable and should not be admitted into evidence! I was a member of the Office of Technology Assessment, (an investigative arm of the U.S. Congress), studying the validity and reliability of the polygraph – our report basically said it was worthless as a “lie detector”. I also testified in the U.S. Congress in support of the EPPA. But, there were exclusions written into the law that allowed the government – local state and federal – to continue to use the polygraph. They attempt to justify these exclusions on the grounds that the government needs this tool to protect national security and the law enforcement officials need it to protect the integrity of the criminal justice system. I have proved the polygraph is not a “lie detector” – the Congress, the Justice Department, the OTA, and all those with any scientific credibility agree with me – so there is no justification for the government to continue to use it on the pretext that it protects our national security or the integrity of the criminal justice system.

    It is FOOLISH and DANGEROUS to use the polygraph as “lie detector” – the theory of “lie detection” is nothing but junk science. It is based on a faulty scientific premise. The polygraph operators have the audacity to say that there is such a thing as a “reaction indicative of deception”, when I can prove that “lying reaction” is simply a nervous reaction commonly referred to as the fight or flight syndrome. In fact, the polygraph is nothing but a psychological billy club that is used to coerce a person into making admissions or confessions. It is FOOLISH and DANGEROUS for government agencies to rely on the polygraph to “test” applicants, or to conduct any type of investigations relating to national security. It is FOOLISH and DANGEROUS for the criminal justice system to rely on an instrument that has been thoroughly discredited to determine whether or not a person is truthful or deceptive, or to use it to guide their investigations in any way – especially when the results cannot even be used as evidence in a court of law! And it is FOOLISH and DANGEROUS for anyone to believe they will pass their polygraph “test” if they just tell the truth! When you factor in all the damage done to people who are falsely branded as liars by these con men and their unconscionable conduct, this fraud of “lie detection” perpetrated by the polygraph industry should be banned completely!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

5 − 1 =


Most Popular


To Top