Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
Charter Merges with Time Warner Cable
Charter Merges with Time Warner Cable
Criminal Charges for ConAgra Foods
Criminal Charges for ConAgra Foods
American Apparel Hit with Another Lawsuit from Former CEO
American Apparel Hit with Another Lawsuit from Former CEO
Uber Made Legal in the Philippines
Uber Made Legal in the Philippines
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

US Justice Department Says Sales Bans for Infringing Key Patents Should be Last Resort View Count: 37

A joint policy statement issued by the Department of Justice and the US Patent and Trademark Office was made on Tuesday clarifying that both organizations were against granting sales bans at the drop of a hat for infringing key or essential patents.

Key patents that ensure the interoperability of electronic devices across makes, models, and platforms, and those usually referred to as “standard essential patents” should be treated differently than patents whose use were more specific. Sales bans for infringing standard patents should be a rare and last option, and should not be granted as a routine practice.

The Federal Trade Commission had recently argued that infringement of “standard essential patents” should attract monetary damages, but not bans, unless the circumstances of a specific case showed a ban unavoidable.

Of recent, allegations over infringing each other’s “standard essential patents” along with other patents have precipitated the global smartphone wars, where almost all technology companies who have stakes in smartphones are battling each other in courts across the globe. Ultimately, the costs of such legal battles are passed on to the consumer.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The joint statement made on Tuesday called upon the U.S. International Trade Commission to consider public interest above other business interests when deciding to put a ban on sales of imported goods for infringing essential patents.

The statement observed, “The USITC, may conclude, after applying its public interest factors, that exclusion orders (sales injunctions) are inappropriate.” However, the opinion is not binding upon judges or panel members of the USITC, who are free to make their own objective judgments of cases before them.

Currently, the USITC is considering allegations made by Samsung that Apple had infringed several of its patents, including some essential patents.

US Justice Department Says Sales Bans for Infringing Key Patents Should be Last Resort by

Tagged: , , , , ,

Posted by on January 9, 2013. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Ethics and Compliance Paralegal
USA-NY-New York City
The Opportunity We help our client partners build on firm foundations, which is why so many major organizations seek our advice and support in creating or reinventing codes of conduct. LRN’s ...


Apply now

Related Posts: