Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has issued criminal subpoenas to Roblox Corporation, marking a significant escalation in state-level scrutiny of the online gaming giant’s child safety practices. The subpoenas, announced Monday, are part of an investigation into allegations that Roblox has failed to adequately protect children from predators and harmful interactions on its platform.

In a video message posted on X (formerly Twitter), Uthmeier said his office is determined to hold the company accountable for what he described as systemic safety failures. “Roblox has created an environment where predators can easily access and exploit our children,” Uthmeier stated. “They enabled our kids to be abused, and they must answer for it.”

The Florida Attorney General’s Office confirmed that the subpoenas were issued under criminal authority, signaling the possibility of a broader probe into whether the company violated state or federal laws related to child exploitation, privacy, or online safety standards. Uthmeier emphasized that the state’s investigation will focus on uncovering potential evidence of criminal activity involving minors on the platform and determining whether Roblox profited from unsafe conditions.

Roblox Under Growing Scrutiny

Roblox, which boasts more than 200 million monthly active users—many of them children and teenagers—has been under mounting scrutiny over the past few years for safety issues. The platform allows users to create and play games designed by other users, but it has also faced criticism for enabling inappropriate content and interactions.

In October 2024, short-seller Hindenburg Research released a report accusing Roblox of failing to protect children from predatory behavior and inappropriate content. The report alleged that, despite the company’s claims of having extensive safety systems, predators and exploitative behavior still thrive within the platform’s vast network of user-generated content.

While Roblox rejected Hindenburg’s claims as misleading, the controversy intensified public debate over whether online gaming platforms are doing enough to safeguard minors. The Florida investigation now places additional legal and political pressure on the company to demonstrate that it has effective protections in place.

Roblox’s Defense and Safety Initiatives

In response to the subpoenas and ongoing criticism, Roblox issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to user safety. The company emphasized that its safety systems include a combination of automated monitoring tools, AI-driven content filters, and human moderators who review user interactions around the clock.

The company has also been developing an age-estimation system that uses facial analysis and machine learning to verify users’ ages, aiming to better control access to certain chat and content features. Roblox has described this initiative as part of a larger effort to make the platform “the safest metaverse for kids and teens.”

Despite these assurances, critics argue that Roblox’s safety measures remain insufficient. Online safety experts have long warned that the platform’s open-world structure and user-generated content system create opportunities for predators to contact and groom children, often through private messages, group chats, or custom-designed games.

Broader Legal and Global Challenges

The Florida subpoenas are not the first legal challenge Roblox has faced concerning child safety. Earlier this year, the Attorney General of Louisiana filed a similar complaint against the company, citing failures in moderating interactions and preventing child exploitation.

Internationally, Roblox has also encountered growing resistance. Iraq recently announced a nationwide ban on the platform, citing concerns that it could expose children to sexual predators and extortion schemes. Other nations have reportedly begun reviewing Roblox’s policies following similar safety concerns.

In the United States, class action lawsuits have also been filed in California and other states, alleging that Roblox’s negligence has allowed predators to engage in abusive behavior on the platform. Several of these cases are still pending, and some have called for greater federal oversight of online platforms catering to minors.

Potential Legal and Policy Implications

The Florida Attorney General’s investigation could have far-reaching implications not only for Roblox but also for the broader online gaming industry. If prosecutors find evidence of criminal conduct or gross negligence, Roblox could face substantial fines, stricter operating restrictions, or mandated reforms to its moderation and safety systems.

Moreover, this case could prompt renewed legislative attention to child protection laws in digital spaces. Lawmakers across several states have proposed new regulations that would require platforms like Roblox to verify users’ ages, restrict chat features for minors, and provide transparency in how they moderate harmful content.

For now, the company remains under intense public and regulatory scrutiny. The subpoenas mark a new phase in the growing conflict between tech innovation and child protection — an issue that continues to challenge both regulators and the digital entertainment industry.

As Uthmeier concluded in his public statement, “Florida will not stand by while tech companies profit off our children’s vulnerability. We will use every tool available to ensure their safety and hold those accountable who fail to protect them.”

Whether this investigation leads to criminal charges, tighter regulations, or a broader reckoning for online gaming safety, it underscores a critical reality: the digital playground is no longer beyond the reach of the law.

Looking to make a difference in the legal field? Explore top legal career opportunities at LawCrossing.com — the most comprehensive legal job site for attorneys, paralegals, and law students nationwide.

The post Florida Attorney General Launches Investigation into Roblox Over Child Safety Concerns first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

In a major legal development shaking the artificial intelligence industry, a group of AI users has filed a class action lawsuit against Microsoft, accusing the tech giant of engaging in anti-competitive behavior through its multibillion-dollar partnership with OpenAI. The lawsuit, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims Microsoft’s exclusive agreements and investments in OpenAI have unfairly restricted market access and inflated prices for generative AI services.

Background: A Powerful Alliance Under Scrutiny

Microsoft’s partnership with OpenAI has been one of the most influential alliances in the AI era. Since 2019, Microsoft has invested over $13 billion in OpenAI, securing a significant stake in the company and exclusive access to its cutting-edge language models — including ChatGPT and GPT-4 — through Microsoft’s Azure cloud infrastructure.

The plaintiffs allege that this partnership granted Microsoft undue control over AI computing resources and pricing structures. According to the complaint, Microsoft and OpenAI entered into a cloud exclusivity deal that forced OpenAI to rely solely on Microsoft Azure for computational power. This, the plaintiffs claim, artificially inflated costs for users, restricted competitors’ access to essential AI tools, and undermined the overall quality of AI services available to the public.

Plaintiffs’ Core Allegations

The lawsuit, titled Samuel Bryant et al. v. Microsoft Corp. (Case No. 3:25-cv-08733), contends that Microsoft leveraged its investment to monopolize the AI ecosystem, using OpenAI’s resources to promote its own suite of products — such as Copilot and Bing Chat — while simultaneously limiting access for rival developers and researchers.

The complaint further asserts that Microsoft’s exclusive control over OpenAI’s compute capacity distorted the AI market, allowing Microsoft to charge higher fees and reduce service options for consumers and developers alike. Users claim they have faced higher subscription prices and limited alternatives since ChatGPT’s public launch in late 2022.

Even though OpenAI reportedly began purchasing cloud computing services from Google Cloud earlier this year — suggesting some loosening of Microsoft’s grip — the plaintiffs argue that Microsoft still retains structural control and could reinstate restrictive terms at any time.

What the Lawsuit Seeks

The plaintiffs are asking the court to award monetary damages to AI users who were allegedly overcharged since the debut of ChatGPT. The lawsuit also seeks injunctive relief to prevent Microsoft from re-establishing exclusive or restrictive arrangements with OpenAI or any similar entities in the future.

At the heart of the case is a broader concern about competition and innovation. The lawsuit argues that Microsoft’s dominance threatens to create a “bottleneck” in the generative AI space — a situation where only a few major players control access to the tools and infrastructure that power AI development globally.

Microsoft’s Response

In response to the lawsuit, a Microsoft spokesperson stated that the company is reviewing the complaint but emphasized that its partnership with OpenAI has been pro-competitive rather than anti-competitive. Microsoft insists that its collaboration has accelerated innovation, expanded access to generative AI tools, and empowered developers and businesses worldwide.

The company highlighted its efforts to integrate OpenAI technology into widely used products like Microsoft 365, Azure AI Studio, and GitHub Copilot, which it claims have democratized access to AI and enhanced productivity for millions of users.

OpenAI’s Position

OpenAI, which is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, declined to comment publicly on the ongoing litigation. The company has faced its own series of challenges in recent months, including regulatory scrutiny over its partnership structure, safety practices, and corporate governance following leadership changes in late 2024.

While OpenAI maintains that it operates independently of Microsoft, critics argue that Microsoft’s deep financial involvement — coupled with its Azure exclusivity deal — effectively gives the tech giant controlling influence over one of the world’s leading AI firms.

The Broader Implications for the AI Industry

This lawsuit could have far-reaching consequences for the rapidly evolving AI sector. Regulators in both the United States and European Union have already expressed concerns over potential market concentration in AI infrastructure, where a handful of companies — notably Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and NVIDIA — dominate the resources needed to train and deploy large-scale models.

If the plaintiffs prevail, it could reshape how cloud providers and AI developers structure their partnerships. It might also influence future antitrust enforcement in emerging technology markets, echoing earlier cases against major tech companies for monopolistic practices in search, mobile, and digital advertising.

Legal experts note that this case mirrors concerns voiced by lawmakers and competition authorities that Big Tech’s influence in AI could replicate the monopolistic patterns seen in earlier digital markets. The central question will be whether Microsoft’s partnership with OpenAI represents innovation through collaboration — or market domination through control.

What’s Next

As the case proceeds, it is expected to draw intense scrutiny from the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and international regulatory bodies monitoring AI competition. The outcome could serve as a precedent for defining the legal boundaries of AI partnerships and investments in the years ahead.

For now, Microsoft’s relationship with OpenAI remains a cornerstone of the company’s AI strategy — and a lightning rod for critics concerned about fairness, transparency, and consumer rights in the age of artificial intelligence.

Explore Legal Opportunities in Emerging Tech Law

As artificial intelligence and antitrust enforcement continue to collide, legal professionals specializing in technology, intellectual property, and competition law are in higher demand than ever. Explore exclusive AI-related and antitrust legal positions on LawCrossing.com — the most comprehensive legal job board in the U.S. Stay ahead of the curve, discover new in-house and law firm opportunities, and take your career to the next level in the fast-changing world of tech law.

The post AI Users Launch Antitrust Class Action Against Microsoft Over OpenAI Deal first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

In a landmark legal move, New York City has filed a sweeping lawsuit against several of the world’s largest social media companies, including Meta Platforms (parent of Facebook and Instagram), Alphabet (Google and YouTube), Snap Inc. (Snapchat), and ByteDance (TikTok). The city accuses these corporations of deliberately designing their platforms to hook children into addictive patterns of use, worsening a youth mental health crisis that’s straining public systems and endangering lives.

Allegations of Manipulative Design

The 327-page complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, paints a detailed picture of how these companies allegedly exploit psychological vulnerabilities in young users. The city argues that platforms are intentionally structured with algorithms, engagement triggers, and content delivery systems engineered to maximize screen time and dependency—often at the expense of children’s well-being.

According to the filing, over 77% of New York City high school students—and 82% of female students—spend at least three hours daily on screens outside schoolwork. Officials say this compulsive use correlates with alarming rates of anxiety, depression, sleep deprivation, and behavioral issues among minors. The lawsuit contends that these problems collectively constitute a public nuisance, placing an undue burden on the city’s education, mental health, and social service systems.

Public Safety and Real-World Harm

The city’s lawsuit goes beyond mental health, connecting digital behavior to dangerous real-world consequences. One stark example cited is the rise in “subway surfing,” a social media–fueled trend where young people ride on top of or cling to the sides of moving trains for online attention.

Officials report that at least 16 people have died since 2023 due to subway surfing, including two girls aged 12 and 13 earlier this month. The complaint argues that such risky stunts have been glamorized and spread through viral content on social platforms—evidence, the city says, of how algorithms amplify harmful behaviors to drive engagement.

The Broader Legal Landscape

New York City’s action adds significant weight to a growing national wave of litigation targeting major social media firms for their alleged role in youth addiction and declining mental health. More than 2,000 similar cases have been filed by school districts, states, and local governments across the United States.

Many of these lawsuits are being consolidated in federal court in Oakland, California, where judges are considering whether the companies can be held legally liable for the impact of their design choices. By joining this consolidated effort, New York City hopes to strengthen its position and align with other jurisdictions pressing for accountability.

The city previously filed a similar claim under Mayor Eric Adams in state court but has since withdrawn from that action to participate in the broader federal case, signaling a more coordinated strategy in confronting tech giants on a national scale.

The Tech Industry Pushes Back

The companies named in the lawsuit have largely denied wrongdoing, asserting that their platforms already include robust parental controls, age restrictions, and content moderation tools.

Alphabet, which owns YouTube, issued an early response disputing the lawsuit’s premise. The company argues that YouTube functions primarily as a streaming platform, not as a social media network encouraging peer-to-peer communication or addiction. Representatives from Meta, Snap, and ByteDance have not yet issued formal comments regarding the New York City filing.

The City’s Demands

In its complaint, New York City is seeking financial damages and injunctive relief to cover the costs of managing what it calls the “public health fallout” of youth social media addiction. This includes expenses associated with school counseling, public education campaigns, and youth behavioral health services.

The city also demands systemic reforms—including changes to platform algorithms, data practices, and the way content is recommended or displayed to minors. These measures, if granted, could force sweeping changes in how social media companies operate nationwide.

Potential Impact on Future Litigation

Legal experts note that this lawsuit could become a bellwether case, potentially shaping future regulations on digital design and youth safety. If the court sides with New York City, the precedent could open the door for other municipalities and school systems to seek similar remedies.

The case also mirrors broader policy efforts to curb digital harm among minors. Lawmakers in several states—including California, Utah, and New York—have introduced or passed child online safety laws requiring parental consent for social media use, limiting screen time, or restricting algorithmic targeting of minors.

A Public Health Framing

New York City officials have emphasized that the issue is not just about technology—it’s about public health. The lawsuit frames social media addiction as an epidemic comparable to other youth crises the city has faced, such as vaping or opioid misuse.

“With this filing, we are taking a stand for our children,” one city representative said. “For too long, these companies have profited from kids’ attention spans while the public pays the price—in mental health crises, in lost classroom time, and in preventable tragedies.”

Looking Ahead

The outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, but the implications could be far-reaching. If successful, New York City’s legal challenge could reshape the social media industry, forcing greater transparency and accountability in how companies design and promote their products to minors.

As concerns about digital addiction and mental health continue to dominate public discourse, the case represents one of the most aggressive efforts yet by a major U.S. city to demand systemic change from Big Tech.

Stay informed with the latest developments in major tech and legal battles—from class action suits to regulatory shifts—by following JDJournal.

For attorneys interested in joining cutting-edge litigation or exploring new opportunities in media and technology law, visit LawCrossing. — the leading legal job board connecting lawyers with positions nationwide.

The post New York City Takes On Big Tech: Lawsuit Claims Social Media Platforms Are Addicting Children and Fueling Mental Health Crisis first appeared on JDJournal Blog.