Are you ready to take your legal career beyond borders? In today’s interconnected world, holding an international law degree is more than a qualification—it’s your passport to a wide array of global legal opportunities. As explored in a recent LawCrossing feature, this credential opens doors across continents, cultures, and sectors.

Why International Law Degrees Are More Relevant Than Ever

Globalization, international trade disputes, cross-border governance—all underscore the surge in demand for legal professionals versed in international law. Whether you’re pursuing an LL.M., J.S.D., or a J.D. with international specialization, this education equips you to navigate complex, transnational legal challenges. Leading institutions like Harvard Law School and the London School of Economics embed real-world applications into their curricula, ensuring graduates are well-prepared for today’s legal landscape.

9 Dynamic Career Paths for International Law Graduates

Your international law degree can launch you into varied and impactful roles. Here are nine promising paths:

1. Mediator — Guide disputing parties toward resolution across legal and cultural divides.
2. Judge or Academic — Lead with legal scholarship, courtroom adjudication, or as a mentor in academia.
3. Policy Analyst or Advisor — Shape international policy with rigorous research and strategic insights.
4. Corporate Counsel — Navigate compliance, contracts, and governance in a global corporate context.
5. Environmental & Climate Law Specialist — Champion sustainability through international treaties and legal frameworks.
6. International Trade Lawyer — Manage trade agreements, sanctions, and cross-border commercial disputes.
7. NGO or International Organization Expert — Serve globally through agencies like the UN, ICRC, or ICC.
8. Think Tank Researcher or Scholar — Contribute to academic and policy-making discourse on international law.
9. Diplomat or Foreign Service Legal Advisor — Represent national interests on global legal issues.

Expert Strategies to Launch Your International Legal Career

• Use Specialized Global Job Boards — Look beyond traditional platforms. Explore roles through niche portals such as the United Nations Careers site or International Labour Organization listings.
• Boost Your Language Skills — Mastering languages like French, Spanish, or Mandarin can give you a major edge in multilingual legal environments.
• Network Intentionally — Build a robust network through LinkedIn, conferences, and membership in professional bodies like the International Law Association or American Society of International Law.
• Engage with Ongoing Learning — Enhance your expertise with online courses from platforms such as Coursera, edX, or FutureLearn.
• Stay Informed via Publications — Keep abreast of trends through journals like the Journal of International Law and outlets like the Stanford Law Review.

Key Insights to Shape Your Future

• Expand Your Horizons — From mediation and academia to corporate counsel and public policy, the international law field spans diverse, dynamic roles.
• Prioritize Advanced Study — Advanced degrees like the LL.M. or J.S.D. help you specialize and stand out in a competitive landscape.
• Master Foundational Skills — Multilingualism, cross-cultural communication, and strong analytical abilities are the pillars of success.
• Adopt a Strategic Approach — Combine targeted education, real-world experience, and proactive networking to navigate the global job market.
• Embrace Future-Focused Fields — Stay ahead by delving into emerging areas like environmental law, digital diplomacy, and trade reform.

Ready to take your legal career global? Don’t just dream about working across borders—start building the path today. Explore international job boards, strengthen your skill set, and leverage networking opportunities that connect you with global legal leaders.

📩 Stay ahead with JDJournal—your trusted source for career insights, strategies, and opportunities that shape the next generation of international lawyers.

The post Your Pathway to a Global Legal Career with an International Law Degree first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Aspiring legal professionals: one small but powerful adjustment to your cover letter can significantly elevate your application in today’s competitive job market. Always address your cover letter to a specific person—it showcases professionalism, effort, and respect, and helps distinguish you from other candidates.

The Impact of a Personalized Greeting

When you address your cover letter to a real individual, you’re signaling that you’ve done your homework and that you’re serious about the role. This simple act communicates attention to detail, thoughtfulness, and genuine interest—qualities highly valued by law firms. Unlike impersonal salutations, a personalized greeting adds a human touch, making your application feel directed and meaningful.

Finding the Right Recipient

If a job posting doesn’t list a contact name, don’t settle for “To Whom It May Concern” or “Dear Hiring Manager.” Instead:

• Call the firm directly, politely asking who handles hiring for the relevant department. Many front desk or administrative staff can share this information.
• Check the firm’s website under sections like “Careers,” “Our People,” or “Team.” Titles such as Recruiting Coordinator, Managing Partner, or Practice Group Leader are good targets.
• Leverage LinkedIn, searching for roles like “Legal Recruiter,” “Hiring Partner,” or “Recruiting Manager” at the firm.
• Use alumni networks—a shared law school affiliation may help you identify or confirm the right person.

Why It Matters—Especially in Smaller Firms

Smaller and mid-sized firms often lack large HR departments. Hiring decisions are typically in the hands of one or two partners. Addressing your cover letter to a named partner—ideally the one listed first in the firm’s name—can make your application feel personal and targeted.

When Generic Instructions Apply

In some cases, large firms may direct you to send applications to “recruiting@firm.com” or submit via an online portal. Even then, still include a personal salutation within your cover letter. Ignoring this can suggest you’re not fully committed to the opportunity.

Additional Best Practices for Legal Cover Letters

To further strengthen your cover letter:

• Tailor each letter to the firm—mention why you’re interested in their work, culture, or recent achievements.
• Use active, precise language. Avoid vague, generic statements—demonstrate how you align with the firm’s needs.
• Avoid repeating your resume. Instead, offer context, tangible examples, and highlight transferable skills.
• Keep it professional and polished. Stick to one page, proofread carefully, and follow formal formatting.

Why This Matters for You

Law firms increasingly prioritize applicants who demonstrate care, initiative, and legal acumen. Addressing your cover letter to a specific person isn’t just courteous—it’s a strategic move that sets the stage for a more meaningful connection and a stronger impression.

By combining a personalized salutation with tailored content, polished expression, and precision, you enhance your application’s clarity, character, and competitiveness.

Remember: Your cover letter is more than an introduction—it’s your first legal writing sample for the firm. Treat it as such, and you’ll stand out for all the right reasons.

The post Personalized Cover Letters: The Small Step That Delivers Big Results first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Graduating from law school marks a pivotal moment—your “Beyond the Courtroom” journey begins now. Securing your ideal legal role requires more than impressive grades; it demands a strategic, proactive approach. Recently featured by LawCrossing, proven methods are emerging that preparation can shape the trajectory of your legal career.

1. Highlight Real-World Legal Experience
Don’t just list coursework—showcase your internships, part-time positions, volunteer service, and any hands-on projects that demonstrate your legal capabilities. Emphasize responsibilities you handled, outcomes you delivered, and, when possible, quantify your impact to make your resume stand out.

2. Deepen Your Skill Set During Law School
While strong grades are essential, cultivating additional competencies gives you a competitive edge. Many legal leaders are seeking proficiency in tools like e-discovery platforms, digital document management systems, legal research databases, and even cybersecurity fundamentals. Seek workshops, seminars, or online training to keep pace with technological demands.

3. Cultivate Strategic Networks
Networking remains one of the most powerful catalysts for career growth. Build relationships with classmates, professors, alumni, and practicing lawyers through conferences, virtual events, and professional associations. Alumni networks and informational interviews often lead to referrals and job leads

4. Leverage Your Law School Career Services
Your school’s career center is your ally. From helping craft standout resumes to alerting you about seasonal hiring cycles—particularly in January, April, July, and October—they offer invaluable insights. Make it a habit to update your application materials quarterly, monitor job boards daily during peak periods, and set up email alerts to stay ahead.

5. Embrace Persistence and Positivity
The job hunt can feel grueling—but resilience goes a long way. Regularly engage with career counselors, seek updated recommendation letters, and always follow up after interviews. Maintain a positive mindset and persistent effort throughout the search process.

6. Consider Alternative Legal Paths
Not all law graduates pursue traditional firm roles. Many are now exploring careers in legal tech—startups like Harvey, Legora, and Eudia are attracting law grads with innovative, AI-driven work, flexible environments, and stock options, despite sometimes offering lower starting salaries. These roles offer meaningful, forward-looking career paths beyond “Big Law.”

Your Path Forward

Embarking on the post-law-school journey? Here’s how to make every step count:

• Document impactful hands-on experience in descriptions that quantify success.
• Upskill beyond academics—master digital tools transforming legal workflows.
• Network with intention—build connections that open doors.
• Use career services smartly, especially during targeted hiring seasons.
• Stay resilient—follow through, update materials, and maintain momentum.
• Explore unconventional routes—startups and legal-tech sectors may offer faster, more innovative opportunities.

JDJournal is here to help you navigate—and thrive in—the evolving legal landscape. Whether your ambition leads you into courtrooms, startups, or beyond, these strategies can help ensure you’re not just prepared—but empowered—to land your dream job.

The post Proven Strategies to Land Your Dream Job After Law School first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

New Proposal Aims to Equip Attorneys with Tools for a Changing Legal Landscape

Wisconsin lawyers may soon be able to earn continuing legal education (CLE) credits for courses on “cultural competency” and “bias reduction,” a move that is being debated as a response to the state’s evolving demographic trends. The proposal, which has already sparked strong opinions, is set for public hearing before the Wisconsin Supreme Court this Wednesday. If approved, the change would allow lawyers to claim up to six of their required 30 CLE credits from training sessions on these important topics.

The Push for Cultural Competency and Bias Reduction

The proposal, introduced by the State Bar of Wisconsin, is positioned as a way to help attorneys navigate a diverse and increasingly complex society. Proponents of the initiative argue that by offering CLE credits for courses focused on cultural awareness and reducing bias, lawyers can enhance their ability to serve clients from a wide variety of backgrounds, thereby fostering better relationships and outcomes within the legal system.

The proposal comes at a time when the legal profession, like many others, is grappling with how to address diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) concerns. As the state’s population becomes more diverse, advocates believe that such programs can help lawyers keep pace with societal shifts and provide more effective representation.

Growing Debate Over Diversity Training in the Legal Profession

Despite the proposal’s support among many legal professionals, it has faced opposition from conservative groups. Notably, the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) has expressed concerns about the effectiveness and quality of DEI-related education. The group argues that equity and inclusion courses have not demonstrated measurable success and have raised questions about the integrity of such programs. WILL has previously challenged similar initiatives, asserting that they may lead to racial discrimination.

This ongoing debate mirrors national trends, particularly following the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in 2023 that prohibited the consideration of race in college admissions. Since that ruling, several states have reevaluated their diversity-related programs. For instance, the Florida Supreme Court recently halted funding for diversity initiatives within the legal community and removed “bias elimination” from the list of eligible CLE topics.

A Shift in the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Composition

This latest development in Wisconsin comes after a notable shift in the state’s judicial landscape. The Wisconsin Supreme Court, which previously held a Republican majority, now operates with a Democrat-majority bench. In 2023, the Court rejected a similar proposal for CLE credits on diversity courses, with Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley vocalizing her opposition by labeling terms such as “diversity” and “equity” as divisive political tools. However, with the Court’s makeup now changed, the outcome of this new petition is uncertain.

Voluntary Credits and National Context

One key aspect of the current proposal is that the new CLE credits would be voluntary, rather than mandatory. This distinction has been emphasized by the State Bar of Wisconsin, which has worked to reassure those who may feel uncomfortable with the idea of mandatory diversity training. Under the proposed framework, attorneys would have the option to choose whether they wish to participate in cultural competency and bias reduction courses.

For context, several other states, including California, New York, Minnesota, and New Jersey, already mandate that lawyers complete CLE credits related to diversity and inclusion, or the elimination of bias. This growing trend reflects the broader movement within the legal profession to address issues of fairness and representation.

Looking Ahead: The Future of CLE Credits in Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision could set a precedent for other states grappling with similar issues. If the proposal is approved, it could pave the way for further integration of diversity and inclusion principles into the legal profession’s ongoing education. However, opposition from groups like WILL suggests that this issue will continue to be a source of contention.

With a shifting political landscape and an evolving public discourse on diversity, it remains to be seen how Wisconsin lawyers will respond to the possibility of earning CLE credits for cultural competency and bias reduction training.

The post Wisconsin Lawyers Could Soon Earn CLE Credits for Cultural Competency and Bias Reduction Training first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Legal technology provider Litera has announced a collaboration with Microsoft to develop an integration with Microsoft Copilot, aimed at enhancing workflows for lawyers. This partnership aims to boost efficiency and accuracy in legal tasks.

Uncover exclusive insights and strategic approaches through the State of the Lateral Law Firm Legal Market 2024—an in-depth report delving into the intricate patterns and current trends within the lateral law firm market.

Advancing Legal Technology Integration

Adam Ryan, head of product at Litera, foresees widespread adoption of Copilot among lawyers by the end of 2024. He emphasized the value of being a Microsoft partner, enabling Litera to create a cohesive user experience. Ryan stated, “We’re excited to innovate side-by-side with Microsoft and bring together Microsoft Copilot and Litera’s robust suite of legal technology.”

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Leveraging AI Expertise

Litera, known for its AI products like Kira AI, brings its expertise in legal workflows and user behavior to the collaboration. Meagan Smith, Microsoft regional director for the legal industry, highlighted the significance of this partnership. She stated, “We are collaborating with Litera to better understand how the legal community will leverage groundbreaking AI technology like Microsoft Copilot.” The aim is to provide seamless integrations and improved workflows for legal practitioners.

Make informed decisions in real-time. Subscribe to JDJournal and be in the know with the latest legal updates.

Toward Enhanced Legal Practice

The collaboration between Litera and Microsoft holds promise for the legal practice community, offering better integration and smoother workflows. As legal technology continues to evolve, such partnerships pave the way for enhanced efficiency and productivity in legal tasks.

The post Collaboration for Streamlined Workflows: Litera and Microsoft Join Forces first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Three U.S. law firms, Freedman Normand Friedland, Gilbert Litigators and Counselors, and Berger Montague, involved in an antitrust lawsuit against 17 elite U.S. universities, are requesting $94.7 million in legal fees for their work on the case. The lawsuit, filed in 2022, accused universities like Brown, Columbia, Yale, and others of unfairly favoring wealthy students in admissions, allegedly driving up tuition costs.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Settlements Reached and Fee Request

These firms have secured settlements totaling $284 million with 10 of the defendant universities. The settlements are subject to approval by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly in Chicago. Columbia and Duke agreed to pay $24 million each, while Northwestern and Vanderbilt agreed to pay $43.5 million and $55 million, respectively.

Uncover exclusive insights and strategic approaches through the State of the Lateral Law Firm Legal Market 2024—an in-depth report delving into the intricate patterns and current trends within the lateral law firm market.

Continuing Legal Proceedings

Despite settlements with some universities, the lawsuit is ongoing against the remaining seven schools. The settling universities have denied wrongdoing, aiming to focus on academic pursuits. The lawsuit represents a proposed class of 200,000 current and former students seeking damages.

Want to stay ahead of the competition? Here’s what you need to do.

Legal Fees and Hours Invested

The attorneys involved claim to have dedicated over 91,310 hours to the case. They argue that the $284 million settlements achieved thus far are exceptional. Hourly rates for attorneys range up to $1,495, with service awards of $20,000 requested for eight named plaintiffs.

Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.

Conclusion

The outcome of this fee request and the ongoing legal proceedings will shape the landscape of college admissions and financial aid policies in the U.S. The case is Henry v. Brown University, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

The post Lawyers Seek $94 Million in Fees for College Aid Case first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Washington’s Groundbreaking Decision

On a recent Friday, the Supreme Court of Washington sanctioned “in concept” two innovative licensing methods specifically designed for graduates of law schools. The first method introduces an apprenticeship program, where graduates will work under the guidance of seasoned attorneys for a duration of six months. Following this period, they are required to present a portfolio of their work for evaluation. The second method offers law students the opportunity to accumulate 12 credits through skills-based courses and complete 500 hours of practical legal work prior to graduation. Successful completion and portfolio submission to the Washington State Bar will result in licensure.

A Growing Trend Across the States

This move by Washington follows in the footsteps of Oregon, which, in November, adopted a similar apprenticeship pathway for its law school graduates. This trend is not new; Wisconsin and New Hampshire have long offered alternatives to the bar exam for licensing law graduates. Moreover, the highest courts in California, Minnesota, and Utah are currently deliberating on proposals to license attorneys without the bar exam. Nevada and South Dakota are also in the process of developing similar proposals.

Addressing Legal Deserts and Fairness

Anthony Varona, Dean of the Seattle University School of Law, and a member of the Washington Bar Licensure Task Force, emphasized that these new licensure options are aimed at protecting the public. They seek to mitigate the issue of “legal deserts” in Washington and address concerns of fairness and bias associated with the conventional licensing process. The task force presented its recommendations to the court in October, following a period of public consultation. While the exact timeline for the implementation of these new pathways has not been disclosed, the Washington State Bar Association has been directed to form a committee to explore viable implementation strategies.

The Challenge of Traditional Bar Exams

The task force highlighted research indicating that the traditional bar exam disproportionately prevents historically marginalized groups from entering the legal profession and imposes a financial strain on graduates. In line with the emerging trend, Oregon’s new licensing program requires law graduates to complete 675 hours of supervised work and submit a portfolio of legal work for assessment, an alternative to the conventional bar exam.

The State Bar of California is also exploring a similar initiative, proposing a program where law school graduates would undertake between 700 to 1,000 hours of supervised legal practice. Participants would then submit a work portfolio for evaluation by the state bar, with successful candidates earning their license. This proposal is awaiting the green light from the state’s supreme court.

These developments signal a significant shift in the licensing of legal professionals, aiming to create more equitable and accessible pathways to the profession while ensuring the public’s protection through competent legal representation.

The post Innovative Licensing Pathways for Lawyers in Washington State first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

In a recent development, a committee within the California State Bar is advocating for state lawmakers to explore regulations concerning the use of AI legal products by non-lawyers. The recommendations, expected to be considered by the California Bar’s board of trustees this week, emerge from the Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct. The focus is primarily on applying generative AI by California lawyers, emphasizing issues such as disclosure practices and ethical billing.

Addressing the Promise and Perils of Generative AI

Generative AI has evolved to provide increasingly sophisticated legal tools, potentially enhancing access to justice by offering free or low-cost legal advice to individuals who cannot afford legal representation. However, the Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct raises a critical concern: the possibility of harm if self-represented individuals rely on generative AI outputs that provide inaccurate information.

Seeking Clarity through Legislation

The committee is urging the board of trustees to collaborate with California’s legislature and supreme court to examine whether the unauthorized practice of law requires a more explicit definition. Additionally, they are considering whether legal generative AI products should be subject to licensing or regulation.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Balancing Innovation with Responsibility

While the recommendations include non-binding best practices for lawyers using generative AI, they fall short of establishing strict ethics rules. Described as an “interim step,” these guidelines offer initial guidance on the evolving technology while further rules and regulations are considered.

The suggested “practical guidelines” encourage attorneys to disclose AI in their representation to clients and propose refraining from charging hourly fees for time saved by utilizing generative AI. However, costs associated with generative AI can still be billed “in compliance with applicable law.”

Tackling Ethical Considerations and Confidentiality

The guidance also addresses the potential threats of AI to confidential information and emphasizes the importance of human oversight in checking the technology’s outputs. The committee recommends developing a one-hour minimum continuing legal education course to enhance attorneys’ understanding of generative AI further.

The Larger Context: Unauthorized Practice of Law

The unauthorized practice of law, particularly non-lawyers providing legal advice, has been a contentious issue in California. Recent legislative actions, such as Governor Gavin Newsom’s bill limiting corporate ownership of law firms, highlight the ongoing debate surrounding the boundaries of legal practice.

Make informed decisions in real time. Subscribe to JDJournal and be in the know with the latest legal updates.

This issue extends beyond California, with states nationwide considering adjustments to restrictions on who can practice law. Utah, for instance, permits entities that wouldn’t traditionally practice law to register for a regulatory sandbox operating with state oversight.

Looking Ahead: Ethical Principles and Industry Response

The Florida Bar is actively working on ethical principles for generative AI, addressing critical questions such as obtaining client consent, technology supervision, and associated fees. Similarly, New York and New Jersey task forces are examining generative AI guidelines.

A recent case, Mata v. Avianca, served as a wake-up call for the legal community when two lawyers used generative AI for a court filing without verifying its accuracy, resulting in citations to non-existent cases—a phenomenon known as hallucination. This incident underscores the importance of responsible AI use within the legal profession and the need for comprehensive guidelines to navigate this evolving landscape.

Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

The post California State Bar Committee Urges Regulation on AI Legal Tools first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX, has come forward with allegations that lawyers from Sullivan & Cromwell played a pivotal role in his downfall during the cryptocurrency exchange’s collapse while simultaneously downplaying their involvement with the company.

Sullivan & Cromwell’s Entry into FTX Affairs

In the summer of 2021, Sullivan & Cromwell entered the picture when FTX’s U.S. arm enlisted the services of their law firm partner, Ryne Miller, as the company’s general counsel, as The New York Times reported. Subsequently, Sullivan & Cromwell became involved in 20 legal matters about FTX and an associated hedge fund.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

The “Rock Solid” Declaration

A mere four days before FTX filed for bankruptcy, Andrew Dietderich, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell, told another attorney that FTX was “rock solid,” according to The New York Times.

The CEO Shuffle Allegation

Bankman-Fried alleges that Dietderich orchestrated his removal as FTX’s chief executive, subsequently appointing a corporate turnaround specialist, John Jay Ray III, to the position. Ray then actively pursued Sullivan & Cromwell’s involvement in managing FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings.

Skyrocketing Legal Fees

According to The New York Times, Sullivan & Cromwell has accumulated over $100 million in legal fees for bankruptcy proceedings. The presiding judge, however, found no tangible evidence of actual conflicts and allowed the firm to continue its work.

Stay up-to-date without the overwhelming noise. Subscribe to JDJournal for a curated selection of the most relevant legal news.

U.S. Government’s Accusations Against Bankman-Fried

The U.S. government has accused Bankman-Fried of promoting FTX Trading as a secure platform for cryptocurrency asset trading while diverting investor funds to his privately held hedge fund.

Bankman-Fried’s Defense Strategy

At his upcoming federal fraud trial, Bankman-Fried is expected to deflect some of the blame for FTX’s bankruptcy toward Sullivan & Cromwell and another advisory firm. He may employ an “advice-of-counsel” defense, contending that many of FTX’s actions received approval from its legal advisors.

Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

The post Allegations Surface: FTX Founder Accuses Sullivan & Cromwell of Manipulation first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

Introduction
Robert Kindler, former top M&A banker at Morgan Stanley, has returned to the legal profession after a hiatus of over two decades. In his new role as the Global Chair of Mergers and Acquisitions at Paul Weiss, Kindler shares his insights on the evolving landscape of deal-making and the shifting prominence of lawyers in this arena.

Lawyers Take the Lead: The New Face of Deal-Making

In a recent interview, Robert Kindler emphasized the changing dynamics of deal-making. While reflecting on his earlier stint as a lawyer 23 years ago, he noted that primarily bankers received the initial calls for deals. However, the current landscape has shifted dramatically, with lawyers taking the lead.

Navigating Complex Challenges: Lawyers in the Biden Era

Kindler acknowledges that lawyers today face multifaceted challenges, including environmental, social, and governance issues and stringent regulatory hurdles under President Joe Biden’s administration. He points out that these factors have led to the postponement or cancellation of numerous deals due to the assessment of time and risk involved.

A Respected Figure in Mega-Deals

Robert Kindler’s reputation in the world of mergers and acquisitions is well-established. He has left his mark on some of the most significant deals of the past quarter-century, including Dow Chemical Co.’s $130 billion merger with DuPont Co., AT&T Inc.’s $85.4 billion acquisition of Time Warner Inc., and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.’s $74 billion purchase of Celgene Corp.

Simplify your legal research. Subscribe to JDJournal and stay informed with just a click.

A Strategic Career Move: Returning to Big Law

At 69, Kindler decided to return to Big Law for several reasons. Morgan Stanley’s CEO, James Gorman, announced his departure, signaling a bank deal-making slowdown. Additionally, Kindler recognized that lawyers tend to enjoy more extended careers than bankers, making it an attractive prospect for his future in the field.

The Changing Face of Activism

Kindler’s role at Paul Weiss will involve advising on activist attacks, a realm he’s been involved in since the 1980s. He highlights the evolving nature of activism, with institutional investors playing a more significant role in recent years. Deal-makers now must carefully consider shareholder reactions and even structure deals to avoid shareholder votes, as the involvement of arbitrageurs and short-term investors can influence the outcome.

Building on Success: Paul Weiss’s Ambitions

Paul Weiss, with Robert Kindler on board, aims to expand its portfolio of large-deal work. Recent successes include facilitating World Wrestling Entertainment’s merger with Ultimate Fighting Championship, resulting in a new public company with an enterprise value of $21.4 billion. The firm also advised Apollo Funds in its $8.1 billion acquisition of Univar Solutions and Merck & Co.’s $10.8 billion acquisition of Prometheus Biosciences.

Don’t waste time scrolling through job postings. BCG Attorney Search has the best legal jobs in your area.

A Pioneering Move: Kindler’s Transition to Paul Weiss

Kindler’s move to Paul Weiss came about when Scott Barshay, the firm’s corporate department chair, and Kindler’s protégé, approached him about a new role. Barshay, known for his unconventional shift from Cravath to Paul Weiss in 2016, had previously worked with Kindler at Cravath during the late 1990s. In his new position, Kindler expects to bring in new clients and support existing Paul Weiss customers in their deals, governance issues, and activism matters.

In conclusion, Robert Kindler’s return to the legal profession at Paul Weiss reflects the shifting landscape of deal-making, where lawyers play an increasingly pivotal role in navigating the complexities of modern transactions. His wealth of experience and reputation in the industry make him a valuable addition to the firm’s ambitious goals in the world of mergers and acquisitions.

Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

The post Robert Kindler Returns to Law, Sees Lawyers as Deal-Makers first appeared on JDJournal Blog.