Legal News

Supreme Court to Take on Abercrombie Religious Battle
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: Abercrombie’s religious battle will now head to the United States Supreme Court as employees continue to fight the store’s tough dress codes. 

The United States Supreme Court has entered into a case involving the dress code at Abercrombie & Fitch, according to The Huffington Post.


Employees of the retail chain claim that they are not allowed to wear anything religious while at work.

The Supreme Court announced on Thursday that it is going to hear an appeal filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regarding whether or not Abercrombie is allowed to disqualify people from obtaining a job because they want to wear a headscarf.

Abercrombie was sued in 2008 by the EEOC on the behalf of Samantha Elauf. Elauf is a Muslim who was rejected from a job with the company at its Abercrombie Kids store in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She was denied the job due to her headscarf, which the company said violated its rigid dress policy.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Elauf was 17 when she was denied the job and wore the headscarf during her job interview.

Elauf was issued a ruling in her favor by a lower court, which said the company was liable for religious discrimination. The decision was reversed by an appeals court, saying that Elauf had to explicitly ask for a religious accommodation.

This is not the first time the company has been accused of religious discrimination either. Multiple employees spoke with The Huffington Post last year about their problems. One Christian teen was forced to remove her cross. A Hindu employee was told to cut a religious string from her wrist. Muslin employees were forced to remove their headscarfs too.

The company agreed to make changes to the dress code in 2013 as part of a settlement in two religious discrimination cases, in which the company said the following in a statement last year:

“We are happy to have settled these cases and to have put these very old matters behind us.”

Image credit:


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Patent Agent with 1 year of chemistry experience

USA-CA-Palo Alto

Palo Alto office of our client seeks entry-level patent agent with 1 year of experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Senior Leasing Real Estate Associate Attorney


Phoenix office of an AmLaw firm seeks Senior Leasing Real Estate Associate Attorney with 23 years of...

Apply Now

Senior Tax Controversy Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Jose

San Jose office of an AmLaw firm seeks Senior Tax Controversy Associate Attorney with 10+ years of e...

Apply Now


Legal Secretary / Assistant


Small boutique litigation firm seeks a legal assistant with a minimum of two (2) years legal secreta...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Boutique law firm in Downtown Los Angeles looking to hire a family law attorney with substantial fam...

Apply now

Associate Director, Legal & Compliance

USA-CA-Manhattan Beach

POSITION SUMMARY The Legal and Compliance role is responsible for contract processing and managemen...

Apply now

Managing Attorney - New York City

USA-NY-New York City

The Managing Attorney will be joining a group of exceptional public interest attorneys to directly i...

Apply now


To Top