Legal News

8th U.S Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects Government’s Bid to Keep Food Stamp Data Secret
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has rejected arguments of the U.S. Department of Agriculture that the public has no right to know which retailer is earning how much of taxpayer’s money under the food stamp program. The DOA had argued that a provision in federal law that allows the application information of retailers to be kept secret also applies in keeping secret how much the government pays out to which retailer. The 8th Circuit did not buy the argument.

Chief Judge William Jay Riley opinionated, “Because the retailer spending information is not ‘submit[ted]’ by ‘an applicant retail food store or wholesale food concern…’ the information is not exempt from disclosure. The department, not any retailer, generates the information, and the underlying data is ‘obtained’ from third-party payment processors, not from individual retailers.”

  
What
Where


The matter came before the 8th Circuit on an appeal filed by South Dakota’s Argus Leader newspaper after the government refused to act on a Freedom of Information Act request and disclose how much the food stamp program paid to individual retailers on an annual basis from 2005 to 2010. When the newspaper went to court, a district court sided with the federal government and held the food stamp statute prevents the disclosure of such information to the public.

Pointing out that “Congress has clearly indicated its intent to involve the public in counteracting fraud perpetrated by retailers participating in this program,” the opinion mentioned, “Between 2007 and 2011, spending ‘more than doubled . . . from about $30 billion to $72 billion,'” and that according to statistics “over fifteen percent of the population” were receiving food stamp benefits from 2012 financial year. The opinion also noted that according to the USDA itself, trading for food stamps was found to be a significant problem with more than 10% of retailers engaging in such fraud. The case has been sent back to the district court.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!






 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Litigator with 5-10 years of general insurance defense experience

USA-FL-West Palm Beach

Boutique litigation firm is looking for an experienced litigator with 5-10 years of general insuranc...

Apply Now

Transactional Real Estate Attorney with 4-10 years of experience

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office is seeking a transactional real estate attorney with 4-10 years of experience.

Apply Now

Real Estate/Business Transaction Attorney with 8+ years of experience

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office is seeking a real estate & business transaction attorney with 8+ years of experience....

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 2-5 years of insurance coverage experience

USA-MD-Towson

Towson office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 2-5 years of business, insurance coverage...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Contract Attorney

USA-CA-Beverly Hills

We are looking for a civil business litigator with 3+ years of experience who is capable of attendin...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

As an in-house legal counsel at Wix’s legal department, you will play a significant role in de...

Apply now

Experienced Insurance Defense Attorney Needed

USA-NY-Bohemia

Defense Negligence firm with offices in Nassau County and main office in Suffolk County seeks a full...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-MO-Kansas City

Successful, expanding KC personal injury law firm seeks an attorney with 5+ years personal injury li...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top