Legal News

Federal Court Removes Ban on Protests Organized on Supreme Court Plaza
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell declared a 1949 legislation banning demonstrations on the marble plaza in front of the Supreme Court as “unreasonable,” “substantially overbroad,” and unconstitutional. In a 68-page opinion, Howell observed that it was not “consistent with the First Amendment for the government to so broadly prohibit expression in virtually any form in front of a courthouse, even the Supreme Court.”

The 1949 law that Howell declared unconstitutional had laid down, “It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement.”

However, the instant case concerned only demonstrations on the Supreme Court Plaza and did not concern demonstrations in the Supreme Court Building.

  
What
Where


The lawsuit was originally filed in response to the arrest of Harold Hodge of southern Maryland from the Supreme Court Plaza, who was standing there and holding a sign stating “The U.S. Gov. Allows Police to Illegally Murder And Brutalize African Americans and Hispanic People.”

Charges against Hodge were dismissed after he agreed to stay away from the Supreme Court Building and grounds for six months. Later, with the help of the Rutherford Institute, Hodge challenged the law.

In her ruling, Howell noted that there was already a D.C. law that permits police to prevent obstruction of entrances to buildings during protests or demonstrations.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Until now, protesters could populate only the sidewalks along First Street following a 1983 ruling by the Supreme Court which held the 1949 law did not extend to the sidewalks.

A spokeswoman for the Supreme Court said court officials were evaluating the opinion.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney - Civil Litigation

USA-OH-Columbus

Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe Co., L.P.A., an established small law firm in Columbus, Ohio, is seeking a fu...

Apply now

Family Law Attorney

USA-WI-Milwaukee

Karp & Iancu, S.C. is looking to hire a family law attorney ASAP. Join one of the fastest growi...

Apply now

Assistant General Counsel, OGC

USA-DC-Washington

  Works efficiently and collaboratively with in-house business and technology personnel, pri...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant with Real Estate Title/Closing Experience

USA-FL-Lakeland

Seeking a candidate with the following qualifications: Paralegal or legal assistant with two o...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-San Antonio

San Antonio office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 5+ years of insurance and 3rd party ...

Apply Now

Construction Litigation Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks mid-level construction litigation...

Apply Now

Senior Transactional Counsel

USA-CA-Long Beach

Long Beach office of our client seeks senior counsel with 10+ years of experience. The candidate wil...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top