Legal News

Federal Court Removes Ban on Protests Organized on Supreme Court Plaza
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell declared a 1949 legislation banning demonstrations on the marble plaza in front of the Supreme Court as “unreasonable,” “substantially overbroad,” and unconstitutional. In a 68-page opinion, Howell observed that it was not “consistent with the First Amendment for the government to so broadly prohibit expression in virtually any form in front of a courthouse, even the Supreme Court.”

The 1949 law that Howell declared unconstitutional had laid down, “It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement.”

However, the instant case concerned only demonstrations on the Supreme Court Plaza and did not concern demonstrations in the Supreme Court Building.

  
What
Where


The lawsuit was originally filed in response to the arrest of Harold Hodge of southern Maryland from the Supreme Court Plaza, who was standing there and holding a sign stating “The U.S. Gov. Allows Police to Illegally Murder And Brutalize African Americans and Hispanic People.”

Charges against Hodge were dismissed after he agreed to stay away from the Supreme Court Building and grounds for six months. Later, with the help of the Rutherford Institute, Hodge challenged the law.

In her ruling, Howell noted that there was already a D.C. law that permits police to prevent obstruction of entrances to buildings during protests or demonstrations.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Until now, protesters could populate only the sidewalks along First Street following a 1983 ruling by the Supreme Court which held the 1949 law did not extend to the sidewalks.

A spokeswoman for the Supreme Court said court officials were evaluating the opinion.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Estate Planning and Trust Administration Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

Woodland Hills office of our client seeks estate planning and trust administration associate attorne...

Apply Now

Trademark Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Portland office of our client seeks trademark attorney with 5+ years of copyright experience. The ca...

Apply Now

Health Care Regulatory Attorney with 2+ Years Experience

USA-TX-Houston

Houston office of our client seeks mid-level healthcare attorney with 2+ years of regulatory, reimbu...

Apply Now

Junior Litigator/Associate Attorney

USA-DC-Washington

Washington, D.C. office of our client seeks junior litigator/associate attorney with 2-4 years of tr...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate (Mid-Level) - Medical Malpractice - Garden City, NY

USA-NY-Garden City

Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Garden City office to fill Medical Malpractice / Health...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-NV-Las Vegas

Prestigious Personal Injury Law Firm seeks an outstanding Attorney. Must be a Nevada licensed Att...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-TX-Beaumont

ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY CDA is seeking Associate Attorney to join the firm\'s Beaum...

Apply now

Legal Assistant- Bilingual

USA-NV-Las Vegas

Prestigious personal injury firm seeks superstar BILINGUAL legal assistant! Candidate MUST have...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top