Legal News

Driving Diplomat Kills Zimbabwe Man, Charged in US with Vandalizing a Government Vehicle
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Citizens around the world should live in fear of foreign diplomats, as those with diplomatic immunity are incredibly difficult to prosecute. In 2008, Andrew Pastirik, an American government employee on assignment in Zimbabwe, allegedly hit and killed a pedestrian, Alois Pedzisai Matyoramhinga, while driving his government-issued SUV through the country’s capital  But because of the peculiarities of diplomatic law, Pastirik is, five years later, only being charged with malicious mischief for causing more than a thousand dollars in damage to the government car.

The trial is shrouded in secrecy, but the Associated Press reports that the incident’s occurrence is not in question; while driving on a dark road, Pastirik has confirmed that he hit and killed Matyoramhinga. What is in question is whether or not Pastirik was intoxicated at the time, or if he had only swerved to avoid oncoming traffic. Pastirik reported the car accident to a security officer at the U.S. embassy in Harare, and the prosecution claims that Pastirik admitted to hitting pedestrians with his car while on an earlier assignment in Afghanistan.


While visiting diplomats are immune to the laws of the nation in which they are working, they can be prosecuted for crimes committed abroad by their own government. Pastirik was protected from prosecution in Zimbabwe, but the United States determined that the incident was worth prosecuting, either on its own or as the result of outside pressure. There are currently no laws that allow the U.S. government to prosecute vehicular manslaughter committed abroad.

In order to prosecute Pastirik, U.S. government attorneys have settled on charging him with vandalizing the government car, which racked up $1,000 in damages from the incident, including Matyorhaminga’s bodily fluids. The defense, however, is demanding that the pedestrian’s death not be included in evidence, as it would lead a jury to consider the case as punishment for the manslaughter, rather than for the vandalism.

In reporting on the case, the Associated Press has found that the reasons for trying the case now, five years after incident, are unknown, and the pretrial hearings were held behind closed doors for national security reasons. They report that part of the delay in prosecuting the case was researching the possibility of bringing Pastirik up on more serious charges.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a mid-level litigation attorney with experience taking/defending dep...

Apply Now

Trust and Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Boutique trust and estate firm is seeking an attorney with 7+ years of experience. Candidate should ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a support attorney with some experience/familiarity with a litigatio...

Apply Now



Wheeling office of our client seeks attorney preferably with 1-3 years of WV litigation experience. ...

Apply Now


Associate Attorney


An Associate Attorney is sought for a growing real estate, trusts and estate planning firm in Prince...

Apply now

Associate - Mid-Level - GL Group


Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Westchester office to fill General Liability position. ...

Apply now

Mortgage Compliance Analyst


Job Description: Rubicon Mortgage Advisors LLC, a locally-owned, boutique mortgage lender is seeki...

Apply now

Litigation Legal Assistant

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Qualifications: Candidate should have 2+ years of previous experience supporting multiple atto...

Apply now


To Top