Legal News

Driving Diplomat Kills Zimbabwe Man, Charged in US with Vandalizing a Government Vehicle
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Citizens around the world should live in fear of foreign diplomats, as those with diplomatic immunity are incredibly difficult to prosecute. In 2008, Andrew Pastirik, an American government employee on assignment in Zimbabwe, allegedly hit and killed a pedestrian, Alois Pedzisai Matyoramhinga, while driving his government-issued SUV through the country’s capital  But because of the peculiarities of diplomatic law, Pastirik is, five years later, only being charged with malicious mischief for causing more than a thousand dollars in damage to the government car.

The trial is shrouded in secrecy, but the Associated Press reports that the incident’s occurrence is not in question; while driving on a dark road, Pastirik has confirmed that he hit and killed Matyoramhinga. What is in question is whether or not Pastirik was intoxicated at the time, or if he had only swerved to avoid oncoming traffic. Pastirik reported the car accident to a security officer at the U.S. embassy in Harare, and the prosecution claims that Pastirik admitted to hitting pedestrians with his car while on an earlier assignment in Afghanistan.


While visiting diplomats are immune to the laws of the nation in which they are working, they can be prosecuted for crimes committed abroad by their own government. Pastirik was protected from prosecution in Zimbabwe, but the United States determined that the incident was worth prosecuting, either on its own or as the result of outside pressure. There are currently no laws that allow the U.S. government to prosecute vehicular manslaughter committed abroad.

In order to prosecute Pastirik, U.S. government attorneys have settled on charging him with vandalizing the government car, which racked up $1,000 in damages from the incident, including Matyorhaminga’s bodily fluids. The defense, however, is demanding that the pedestrian’s death not be included in evidence, as it would lead a jury to consider the case as punishment for the manslaughter, rather than for the vandalism.

In reporting on the case, the Associated Press has found that the reasons for trying the case now, five years after incident, are unknown, and the pretrial hearings were held behind closed doors for national security reasons. They report that part of the delay in prosecuting the case was researching the possibility of bringing Pastirik up on more serious charges.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!





Jay Goodman and Associates Law Firm, PC is seeking one full-time and one part-time attorney to repre...

Apply now

Legal Assistant


Legal Assistant/Paralegal The law office of Kevin L. Ferrier located in Tyler, Texas is in need of ...

Apply now

Transactional Attorney


Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, LLP is seeking a full-time Transactional Attorney....

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant


Description Small boutique law firm in Hyde Park with well established local government law pract...

Apply now




Search Now

Business and Transactional Associate Attorney


Middletown office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks business and transactional asso...

Apply Now

Business and Transactional Associate Attorney


Hartford office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks business and transactional associ...

Apply Now

Business and Transactional Associate Attorney

USA-CT-East Haven

East Haven office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks business and transactional asso...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top