Law Students

Law Student Sues over Cell Phone Seizure in Rajat Gupta Case
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

A second-year law student, Benula Bensam, entering her third year at the Benjamin Cardozo School of Law has filed a lawsuit against U.S. Marshals Service and Preet Varrara, Manhattan’s to federal prosecutor, for seizing her phone illegally. The matter was made public on Monday though the lawsuit had been filed on July 10. A judge has not yet been assigned to the matter. The law student accuses Preet Varrara of instigating involvement of the U.S. Marshals leading to the illegal seizure of her cell phone.

According to court rules, members of the public are not allowed to bring cell phones into the U.S. District Court in Manhattan and need to leave their electronic devices with the security when entering the building.

The event happened after Benula Bensam, the law student, started writing letters to Judge Rakoff in the high-profile Goldman Sachs insider case of Rajat Gupta. Bensam claims she was attending the Gupta trial as a law student “to understand the process of litigation,” but to understand things better she began writing letters to the judge.


When the fact of the law student trying to communicate with the judge in the high-profile matter came to notice of the marshals, according to the complaint of Bensam, the marshals told court security to seize her cell-phone and keep it overnight. The lawsuit mentioned that Bensam’s phone had been returned the next day, but there was a probability that it had been turned on and searched.

Undeterred by the event of having her cell phone seized overnight on June 4, the law student tried on June 6to deliver a fourth letter to judge Rakoff. On that day, the judge called her before the bench and asked her to refrain from communicating with him, because it might seem as if she were trying to influence the outcome of the case.

However, Bensam maintains that the U.S. Marshal’s Service illegally seized her phone, and “The U.S. Marshals are to be held responsible for actions taken by court security officers for their role in the seizure of my phone.” The lawsuit accused concerned officers of “unreasonable search and seizure.” It also claimed “It is not a crime for a disinterested party to write letters to a judge on the subject of a trial.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!



Paralegal / Legal Assistant

USA-NY-Staten Island


Apply now


USA-WA-Walla Walla

When the COVID crisis hit our state, we continued serving clients in our community. We are...

Apply now

Associate Attorney


A/V Rated Downtown Orlando Law firm of Fisher Rushmer, P.A. is seeking an associate with 2 - 6 years...

Apply now

Legal Extern / Litigation Law Clerk


Old Towne Associates, P.C. (Alexandria, VA) Legal Extern Openings - Class of 2021 and 2022 ...

Apply now




Search Now

Mergers and Acquisitions Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Mergers and Acquisitions Associa...

Apply Now

Senior Wealth Management Group Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of our client seeks Senior Wealth Management Group Associate Attorney with 9 years ...

Apply Now

Bankruptcy Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Bankruptcy Associate Attorney ...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top