Law Students

Former Students’ Lawsuit against Cooley Law School Dismissed
Download PDF

On Friday, a Michigan court dismissed a lawsuit brought by former students of Cooley Law School accusing the law school of misrepresenting graduate job placement statistics. The lawsuit, which sought $250 million in damages, was dismissed as the court did not accept the arguments of the plaintiffs that purchasing a legal degree come under the protection of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act.

In fact, Judge Gordon Quist held that the job numbers in question were “literally true” and it was immaterial whether they differentiated between recent grads in legal jobs vs. non-legal jobs. The court also added that the plaintiffs had “unreasonably relied upon the representations” in making their decisions to join the law school.

Though on the earlier June 5 hearing on Cooley Law’s motion to dismiss the suit, the judge did not agree with many of the contentions of Cooley Law School, the case principally rested upon the question of whether the students merited the protection of the MCPA or not. When Cooley lawyers had argued that the lawsuits should in fact be aimed at the ABA and the NALP, the judge had dismissed such contentions and said, “Regarding the ABA and NALP standards, they’re a floor and not a ceiling.”


However, even in the last hearing the judge had given sufficient indication of his thoughts to Jesse Strauss who represented the students. He had said, “I don’t see that it’s a consumer issue … The fraud count – I think you’ve got an uphill battle.” Quist had further told the lawyer for the plaintiffs, “Even in your own statement you say they wanted to, in essence, get jobs in the legal profession and become high-skilled and high paid lawyers in some law firms … To me, that’s a business reason as distinguished from a consumer protection reason.”

The judge ultimately found that the decision to join a law school is in the nature of a business and commercial investment and not a consumer purchase for personal use. Hence, the former students did not merit protection of the MCPA and the case was dismissed.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!





Search Now

Junior Commercial Litigation Attorney with products liability experience


Phoenix office of our client seeks junior commercial litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experienc...

Apply Now

Employment Defense Attorney with 5+ years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks employment defense attorney with 5+ years of litigation exper...

Apply Now

IP Patent Attorney with 2-5 years of computer engineering experience


Milwaukee office of our client seeks intellectual property patent attorney with 2-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now


Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

Fast-paced, mid-sized law firm, located in San Francisco, is searching for a litigation attorney wit...

Apply now

Legal Assistant - Litigation


Our office is looking for a person who does litigation cases. Please call our office at 956-428-2102...

Apply now


USA-NY-New York City

The Flomenhaft Law Firm, PLLC is a Manhattan based plaintiff’s personal injury trial law firm ...

Apply now

Commercial Real Estate Associate


Searching for an experienced commercial real estate associate. Ideally, this candidate has gained th...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top