2nd Circuit to Decide the Fate of Coudert Brothers’ Clawbacks
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Thursday, U.S. District judge Colleen McMahon said that the law firms affected by her decision in the Coudert Brothers’ case may appeal her earlier ruling. Her earlier controversial decision had allowed the estate of now defunct law firm Coudert Brothers to pursue the claw back of profits from legal matters that former lawyers of the firm took to rival firms at the time of the firm’s collapse. Major law firms, including Dechert and DLA Piper would be appealing her earlier decision.

This new turn of events regarding claw back claims can also affect the ongoing settlement talks between Dewey & LeBoeuf and its former partners, as well as affect the fate of the Dewey estate. The controversial decision in the Coudert Brothers’ case allowed the Coudert estate to pursue money earned from unfinished business of the firm to repay its creditors.

The judge said that she believed her original decision allowing the claw back suits to move forward was correct. However, she admitted “existing law does not give a clear-cut answer” to whether the unfinished legal business was an asset of a bankrupt law firm’s estate. Until now, this had been the line taken by the Dewey estate, but things are bound to change considering that the judge had certified the decision for appeal.


The firms affected by the earlier decision in the Coudert Brothers’ case would be asking the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to take up the case within the next 10 days. The judge also wrote that the appellate court should, in its turn, ask the New York Court of Appeals on how New York law treats the unfinished legal business of a dissolved law firm.

The earlier decision in the Coudert Brothers’ case had cast considerable shadow over the mobility of lawyers and rainmakers with ‘portable’ portfolios of clients. The judge acceded the fact and wrote “An interlocutory answer to whether an unfinished client matter should be treated as an ‘asset’ of a dissolved law partnership has the potential to affect a large number of cases – some of which are already pending in this Court.”

However, in a bizarre twist, while certifying the case for appeal, the judge also requested the 2nd Circuit to reverse part of her decision which had allowed former partners to subtract a sum for their “efforts, skill and diligence” from any profits they earned on unfinished business.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!



Senior Counsel


Senior Counsel    About Us The Buried Alive Project is a non-profit criminal just...

Apply now

Associate Aviation Attorney


Qualifications Private Pilot Certification (Required) Full Job Descr...

Apply now

Legal Assistant


Description      An AV-rated Civil Litigation Firm, specializing in real property,...

Apply now

Associate Attorney- Litigation


About the Job: Established AV-rated Missoula law firm is seeking an articulate and ambitious asso...

Apply now




Search Now

Junior to Mid-level Cybersecurity, Privacy and Technology Associate Attorney

USA-NY-Garden City

Garden City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a junior to mid-level cybersec...

Apply Now

Patent Prosecution Attorney


Milwaukee office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks patent prosecution attorney with...

Apply Now

Junior/Mid-level Trust and Estate Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks junior/mid-level trust and estat...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top