Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
DLA Piper Attorney Killer Pleads Guilty
DLA Piper Attorney Killer Pleads Guilty
Lawyer Indicted for Witness Tampering in Anti-Muslim Hate Crime
Lawyer Indicted for Witness Tampering in Anti-Muslim Hate Crime
The 14 FIFA Individuals Who Have Been Indicted
The 14 FIFA Individuals Who Have Been Indicted
Working Part-Time Isn’t Always Career Suicide for Attorneys and Professionals
Working Part-Time Isn’t Always Career Suicide for Attorneys and Prof...
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

U.S. is Assured Their $5 Billion S&P Suit Will be Proven Not Retaliation View Count: 598

doj

Summary: Despite Standard & Poor’s Claim that the Justice Department singled them out in their $5 Billion Suit out of retaliation, the U.S. is confident their documents will demonstrate to the court  otherwise.

The United States confidently denies that its $5 million suit against Standard & Poor is retaliation, claiming that nothing in the documents S&P sought will expose such a connection. S&P claims that they were singled out, and not their competition, Moody and Fitch, for charges that they inflated ratings before 2008 financial crisis to secure greater fees from issuers, and they alone were targeted because they downgraded the United State’s “triple-A” credit rating on Aug. 5, 2011.

The Justice Department is “confident” that U.S. District Judge David Carter’s review will “not support the defendants’ allegations of retaliation in any way,” as Reuters reported.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




S & P meanwhile claims in its recent court filings that government lawyers had “an intense interest in and engagement regarding S&P’s downgrade of the United States,” and further claims that they have access to internal Justice documents that demonstrate “that the two topics were often linked.”

Harold McGraw, chairman for S&P’s larger institution, McGraw Hill, claims that former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told him three days after the downgrade that they had made a “huge” math error, and that they would be held “accountable.” S&P would have to demonstrate that more of this would be found in the Justice’s documents.

The documents are not public, though we might get a peek in the September hearing. The hearing is scheduled to take place Sept. 9, in the case of U.S. v. McGraw-Hill Cos et al, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 13-00779.

S&P meanwhile claims in their case that their opinion of the U.S. credit rating is protected under the First Amendment, and are represented by Floyd Abrams, a First Amendment Specialist.

U.S. is Assured Their $5 Billion S&P Suit Will be Proven Not Retaliation by

Tagged: , , ,

Daniel June Posted by on August 26, 2014. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Ethics and Compliance Paralegal
USA-NY-New York City
The Opportunity We help our client partners build on firm foundations, which is why so many major organizations seek our advice and support in creating or reinventing codes of conduct. LRN’s ...


Apply now

Related Posts: